sub box??

[halvard]

what should i use to my 2x mm2104 subs??
messurments on the box?? i have heard all from 40liters to 90liters??

please help?

[MacLeod]

Dont know liters my man but the MM2104 requires .66 cubic feet gross internal volume.

As far as what to use to power it, youll want something puting out 300x2. I recommend a class D amp and it depends on how much you want to spend.

In the money-no-object category,
this Xtant 6.1 (http://www.cardomain.com/item/XTAXTANT61) is the best out there.

For a more budget choice this Phoenix Gold Xenon (http://www.cardomain.com/item/PHOX6001) would work. So would this Sony (http://www.cardomain.com/item/SONXMSD61X).

This Alpine (http://www.crutchfield.com/S-8FHnjWDSGee/cgi-bin/ProdView.asp?g=130&I=500MRDM501) would be my 2nd choice behind the Xtant and it goes for a good price.

[halvard]

i have the mtx thunder 421D amp to power the amps...
1.38 cu. pr. chamber. i think is recommended.. i dont know.. very confused.. but.. is it better to make the box to big or to small??

[Kim]

The enclosure recommendation will depend on the type of bass that you prefer. For a tight well controlled bass response I would suggest installing each sub into a sealed enclosure volume of 18.69 Liters or .66 cubic feet. You can go as large as 21.2 Liters or .75 cubic feet sealed for each sub. If you goal is a extended and warmer and more efficient bass response then install each sub into a ported box volume of 35.4 Liters of 1.25 cubic feet. Tune the enclosure using a 76.2 mm or 3 inch diameter port that is 254 mm or 10 inches in length. Line all of the interior walls of the enclosure with polyfill.

[halvard]

thanx... yes i was thinking about a closed/sealed box for that tight bass...

thanx for the info mate !!

[exalted512]

put some type of wire, something like chicken wire thats not too constructive on the inside of the port if you put poly fill in the box
-Cody

[neomagus00]

Originally posted by exalted512
...something like chicken wire thats not too constructive...
-Cody
constrictive :)

[exalted512]

actually i meant obstructive, but yea
-Cody