Monitor 50 VS Monitor 60(TB90)

[Home Theatre]

Are there major differences???? Sound quality?

[RuSsMaN]

A little more bass extension.

[rodneeb]

I preferred the 60s over the 50s when I demo'd them. The 60's sounded fuller to me, with more midrange to my ears.

[Ern Dog]

60's sound better to my ears than the 50's.

If you haven't done so already, audition the RTi series as well. It is a little more money, but the sound quality is double that of the monitor series.

[tommyboy]

the sound quality is double that of the monitor series.

So where is the specs to prove that. So the LSI is triple the sound quality;) :D

Home theatre, whenever you are looking between to speaker(one better than the other), always try to pick the better for a little more money. I had a choice between monitor 50s (200 a pair) or RTI8s (350 a pair, both prices circuit city accomodation). I chose the m50s to save money but everytime I play music or put in a movie, I wonder how much better it would sound with the rti8s. I want to kick myself in the ass now for not getting the 8s.:mad: For me, it was only $150 more:( :mad: :mad: :mad: :eek: :eek:. I still didn't get it, I'm a dumbass

So my advise to you is get at least the monitor 60 (or shoot up to the rti8s) cause I guarantee you will do the same thing I did.

For the price m50s sound good but... Theres better out there...

tommyboy

[Ern Dog]

So where is the specs to prove that. So the LSI is triple the sound quality;) :D


Now don't get your panties in a wad. Of course I don't have specs to prove it. Just my opinion.

[tommyboy]

Now don't get your panties in a wad. Of course I don't have specs to prove it. Just my opinion.

Ern Dog,

Now don't get your panties in a wad. it was just a joke which I explained with ;) and :D . If you read the rest of my post I pretty much proved your opinion.

tommyboy

[Ern Dog]

My bad, I over-reacted.