Who says HT needs to be >/=5.1

[gidrah]

http://members.tripod.com/~BassPig/

No center or surrounds, but I think this guy must have a sub around somewhere!:lol:

I like the pole dissecting the TV.

[gidrah]

Sorry about the spastic banner. I didn't do it and I can't stop it.

[burdette]

Did you notice the settings on the two equalizers?? That one makes me wonder if he has the woofers connected at all.

[LiquidSound]

I like the finish on that sturdy looking tv stand.

Seriously, nice system. But compared to his speakers, that's a timex..not a television.

[woodyjacobs]

Yeah, what is up with those e.q. settings? Nice old marantz tuner, though.

That guy has got to be single.

[faster100]

looks like a bunch of old junk to me :)

[mantis]

DTS and Dolby mean anything?

[TroyD]

We've already had the HT minimum requirement discussion. For a rehash, look here:

http://clubpolk.polkaudio.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=4758

Regardless, the cool factor on that rig is very high.

BDT

[gidrah]

Originally posted by mantis
DTS and Dolby mean anything?

Apparently not to everybody. That's why it's in the 2ch forum.

[infinitiqx4]

Originally posted by TroyD
Regardless, the cool factor on that rig is very high.

No doubt, this was very cool... before I was born.

[George Grand]

Those size E-V woofers, with those EQ settings? This guy is still in the "maturation" process. Guys basement is like one of those boom buggies.

Do not be fooled or in awe of those bass cabinets. Acoustic Research, KLH, and Advent, cleaned all these companies clocks back then, cause they could get just as much, BETTER DEFINED low end from much smaller boxes.

George Grand (of the Jersey Grand's)

[danger boy]

you would think they guy could at least afford a tv stand or some nice speaker griles. :p

[LiquidSound]

Or a bigger timex.