View Full Version : ADCOM GFA 555 vs 555 ii which is more desirable..in your prof. opinions?
RandyWilliamson
05-20-2009, 08:42 PM
GFA 555 vs 555 mk.ii which is more desirable? to match with my monitor 10s upgraded XO's RDO198s to follow.
Im leaning on adcom cuz im a basshead....thats right I said it.
But no seriously i love my monitor 10's and am excited...pleez help with your much valued experience....
Throw in your preffered pre-amp with this combo as well...tube even if this is a wise entry level opportunity to introduce myself to it.
Thanks again to all.
This is my first tru blue hi-fi system and I just want to make some wise choices avoiding financial pitfalls.
So I need all the help I can get.
Although OLDER and perhaps needing new caps, etc. The original Adcom GFA-555 is the best in that series.
Either unit has more than enough power for those 10s.
cnh
comfortablycurt
05-20-2009, 08:49 PM
http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?t=53981&highlight=adcom+555
Check out this thread, it describes all of the differences between them.
The consensus seems to be that the original 555 is better.
Randy,
Here's heiney9s discussion of what's a good Adcom pre-amp! I hope he doesn't mind but this is GREAT INFO!
The best pre amp Adcom made was the GFP-750. It was a Nelson Pass design based very closely on his $4000 Aleph P, which is considered among the best sounding SS pre-amps. The 750 is a dead neutral preamp in both passive and active mode. If you don't like dead neutral sounding components I'd steer clear of it.
I have one I'm borrowing from my brother...........it's dead neutral and when paired with my warm, open Aleph 30 amp it certainly sounds much different then what I'm used too. For me the jury is still out as to whether or not it has the correct synergy I'm looking for. That said, it's a fantastic sounding pre-amp.
The GFP-750 retailed for between $1250-1500 depending on when it was purchased. Typically mint units sell in the $800-950 range used with lesser units (many missing the remote) selling for $650-800. I believe you can still get the remote from Adcom, but if you find a unit w/o it I'd call Adcom to make sure.
The GFP-710 and GFP-715 are also among their better designs. Anything with a tuner in it is not the greatest and leaves a lot to be desired. The GFP-555 is also one people commonly see.......not the greatest unit either.
This would be my only recommendation for Adcom pre-amps
GFP-750
GFP-715
GFP-710.......in that order. Anything else short of free; I'd look else where.
Hope this helps
Linky to a review from Stereophile http://www.stereophile.com/solidpreamps/133/
H9
P.s. we were using the GFP-750 to run Ted's currently acquired (by my brother) BAT VK-120's since the Adcom is a true balanced pre and they sounded absolutely fantastic, dynamic, balanced, very open and detailed, not a hint of harshness. If it's good enough for those; it's good enough for anything
RandyWilliamson
05-20-2009, 08:54 PM
Comftorble Curt I saw that one but it wasnt very clear...and to be honest I was think the ii's might be more probable to have good caps functioning...vs...the older......altho I may not be too far from being able to replace the caps..but would rather not.
So I just want to hear for sure if the original is truly more desirable becuz that thread and the review posted there by H9 in my eyes shows a fair to good/healthy upgrade but you guys know better than me...i guess it would boil down to opinions so lets hear them.
thnks CNH and thanks for the order it gives me the opportunity to build around my budget...much appreciated.
RandyWilliamson
05-21-2009, 12:36 PM
anymore opinions out there?
engtaz
05-21-2009, 01:13 PM
I have heard that the 555II fixed somethings that were no done right on the 555 and that's about it.
i have heard that the 555ii fixed somethings that were no done right on the 555 and that's about it.
what?
Serendipity
05-21-2009, 01:30 PM
555, I believe it has more power.
comfortablycurt
05-21-2009, 11:56 PM
I have heard that the 555II fixed somethings that were no done right on the 555 and that's about it.
I've always heard the opposite.
The original 555 was a Nelson Pass design, and was very simple in it's design. That's part of what gave it the sound that it has. Nelson Pass wasn't involved with the re-engineering of the 555II though, and from what I've gathered, the Adcom engineers took it and tried to improve on it, but in doing so, they made it's design more complex, but not necessarily better.
This detracted from the SQ from what I've heard. Out of all the reviews I've read, the consensus seems to be that most people prefer the original version.
ben62670
05-22-2009, 12:32 AM
I llike emu
RandyWilliamson
05-22-2009, 01:32 AM
Ben what is Emu?
engtaz
05-22-2009, 06:26 AM
I believe what I wrote was paraphrasing a comment buy Nelson Pass. I did not say which was better.
george daniel
05-22-2009, 06:39 AM
Ben what is Emu?
Emu is the name for a modded 555 adcom,,jk,,, get the 555 and make sure the caps are not leaking/ get Ben or someone ,yourself if you can weild a soldering iron,,and do the cap mod,, use the search function, as someone here just recently did it,,pretty simple..Good luck.
RandyWilliamson
05-22-2009, 02:39 PM
You speak of thiiissss:
http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?t=83106&highlight=adcom+555
565 mod applies to 555?....I can do it but I'd have to get around to it I guess..im just a lazy bastard sometimes...plus rigging my home theater and this is some work as is.
heiney9
05-22-2009, 02:52 PM
Comftorble Curt I saw that one but it wasnt very clear...and to be honest I was think the ii's might be more probable to have good caps functioning...vs...the older......altho I may not be too far from being able to replace the caps..but would rather not.
So I just want to hear for sure if the original is truly more desirable becuz that thread and the review posted there by H9 in my eyes shows a fair to good/healthy upgrade but you guys know better than me...i guess it would boil down to opinions so lets hear them.
thnks CNH and thanks for the order it gives me the opportunity to build around my budget...much appreciated.
Well there is really only a few years difference between the two models so caps and longevity will be about the same.
I like the older versions for a couple reasons
1) I like direct coupled amps......caps influence sound
2) The orignal is much simpler and closer to Nelson Pass's original design. The MKII is unecessarily complicated.
3) Not a huge fan of the Darlington output stage (again think simplicity).
Either would be fine but I'd replace the coupling caps right away if you get the MKII. That's where the weakness is in any amp that is capacitor coupled of that age.
Hope this helps
H9
heiney9
05-22-2009, 03:05 PM
I believe what I wrote was paraphrasing a comment buy Nelson Pass. I did not say which was better.
Here is the exact quote: from 2002
I designed the 555. I believe the Mk II added a couple
of what were considered improvements, and it seemed
to me that it included triple darlington outputs instead
of 2 follower. I might have the schematic around, but
all told it was a simple bipolar design with a current
sourced input diff pair followed by a common-emitter
gain device that was also current sourced. This drove
the followers.
It was typical of all the 5XXX amps that I did the first one
and then they improved it until it had too many parts,
and then I would design the next in the series
Americo Borza sent me an old 555 in the hopes that I
would update it, and it still sits here, a perfect candidate
since so many of them were built.
Personally, I would score a few of these and run them till
they die and then update them. If you wait long enough,
an update will be issued.
H9
P.s. I love the 2nd line in paragraph 2 :D. Also the highlighted part is sort of tongue in cheek (meaning it probably didn't improve anything)
GV#27
05-22-2009, 03:21 PM
Either would be fine but I'd replace the coupling caps right away if you get the MKII. That's where the weakness is in any amp that is capacitor coupled of that age.
Hope this helps
H9The MK2 is direct coupled.I believe they are using a servo instead of a coupling cap.
heiney9
05-22-2009, 03:32 PM
The MK2 is direct coupled.I believe they are using a servo instead of a coupling cap.
I think you're correct. I'm confusing it with the 545 MKII. I've had that model on the brain since I owned one for so long. They do use a servo for d/c offset in the 555 MKII. Sorry for the mis-information.
engtaz
05-22-2009, 08:01 PM
Thanks H9 That's the statement I read.
lakesailor
05-23-2009, 07:57 PM
I have had both in the past and really you cannot go wrong with either amp; both are great buys for the money they sell for these days. If I ever got another I would likely hunt for one of the later Mark II versions that had a removeable power cord.
As I recall Stereophile reviewed both (likely find online) I believe they felt that the Mark II was an "improoved" version of the original 555 for whatever that is worth. Either way you can do no wrong. Go funky and buy one of the all white albino versions...they were very cool.....
Poee7R
05-23-2009, 09:02 PM
Ive owned both.
If I were to buy another one, it would be the MKII. Smoother on top than the original, and better at dealing with tougher loads. Not to mention they have a better resale value, not much but still a bit.
Dave
RandyWilliamson
05-29-2009, 01:17 AM
I want to thank everyone who helped make my selection in my first entry level hi-fi stereo rig.....I am the proud owner of a GFA-555 picked up locally.....completely immaculate in it's original box....tested and played right in front of me.
Absolutely no hums...4 big ones later she went home with me....and I cannot complain...this was no ebay buy without me viewing the hardware!....
I have a GFA-710 on it's way w/remote.....315$ after shipping....
Tommorrow I will pick a cd player.
Still contemplating that marantz 5 cd carousel...or maybe the 400's with a dac.....or a bluray player that does it all.....
comfortablycurt
05-29-2009, 03:25 AM
Very nice, congrats on the new toys.
I take it you snagged the 710 that was just up on ebay? Congrats.
I'm likely going to be getting either a 710 or a 715 pretty soon. I'm getting a GFA-545 this weekend, so a pre-amp is next on the list.
I'm looking forward to hearing your thoughts on the new setup once you get it all together.:)
RandyWilliamson
05-29-2009, 03:46 PM
Oppo BDP-83 wins....just pulled the trigger...I think I'll be happy with 1 cd playing at a time if it doubles for a Blueray player!...if not either way a carousel will have to wait.
Hoping it can serve the level of dac the marantz does.....not that my ears are anywhere near experts yet.
If not, you can always pick up an external DAC down the road.
Tony M
06-02-2009, 01:59 AM
Does anybody have experience using the gfa555 with POLks' big SDA SRS's? The speakers with 8 mbs and 4 tws. in each.
He also has a ADCOM 5802 amp. My friend who just bought the charlotte sda's has both kinds of amps and wants to know.
He's going to join the club soon:D
He has 2 555mk2's and would love to bridge the power in each BUT he also has seen the warning not to use bridged amps:(. Is there any way he can get around it so he can have astronomical power for his new man toys?
heiney9
06-02-2009, 08:53 AM
Don't use bridged amps with SDA's..............well actually you can't because of the common ground issue.
The 555 is great with the big SDA's. The 5802 would be even better as it's a bit more refined than the 555 and has more reserves and is all around better amp. The 5802 is NOT common ground so you'll need to get some beefy speaker cable and tie the negative speaker terminals together to make it common ground and compatible with any SDA speaker.
heiney9
06-02-2009, 08:55 AM
Don't use bridged amps with SDA's..............well actually you can't because of the common ground issue.
The 555 is great with the big SDA's. The 5802 would be even better as it's a bit more refined than the 555 and has more reserves and is all around better amp. The 5802 is NOT common ground so you'll need to get some beefy speaker cable and tie the negative speaker terminals together to make it common ground and compatible with any SDA speaker.
H9
P.s. DO NOT attempt to tie the terminals together on bridged amps. It will not create a common ground and the amps will go POOF with authority as well as probably damaging drivers and crossover in the SDA's
lakesailor
06-02-2009, 11:29 AM
Does anybody have experience using the gfa555 with POLks' big SDA SRS's? The speakers with 8 mbs and 4 tws. in each.
He also has a ADCOM 5802 amp. My friend who just bought the charlotte sda's has both kinds of amps and wants to know.
He's going to join the club soon:D
He has 2 555mk2's and would love to bridge the power in each BUT he also has seen the warning not to use bridged amps:(. Is there any way he can get around it so he can have astronomical power for his new man toys?
I used a single GFA 555 Mark II with a pair of SDA-SRS and was very happy with the results at the time. The GFA 555 series is a great amp and can comfortably drive just about anything.
I still think they are a great buy used. Good luck.
george daniel
06-02-2009, 11:39 AM
If I had it to do over again with my 555's,I would opt for the cap mod that seems easy enough to do,IIRC,someone just recently posted theirs,and reported favorable results,,I think. Good luck.
RandyWilliamson
06-02-2009, 12:06 PM
I went with GFA-555 mark1 original series.
I found one locally...in impeccable shape...in it's original box.
I was incredibly lucky...guy I bought from was very cool we shot the chit for like 2-3 hours....he let it go for 400$...he was kind enuff to test setup it and crank it for me before I left on his own speakers.
I been running it now for about a week..my 710 pre-amp hasn't gotten here yet..but I got the laptop feeding it direct.....WOW WOW WOW....the clarity is incredible.....the bass is much much tighter and the speaker's don't fatigue at all on loud volumes.....I may never buy another Sony product again....I was DEFINITELY getting clippage at the top end before.
I find no need to crank it 100% I'm satisfied before it....but even more importantly is how clear everything is still maintained. I can't wait for the pre-amp to get here and for the Oppo as well.
Thanks to everyone who pitched in. I am sure the MK II doesn't bring any downsides as the core of this unit must be hard to mess up....I opted for the original series from your opinions and from habitually also finding more value in simpler sometimes older designs...I sometimes do maintenance or upgrades myself and the simpler the better ....I found many reviews of ppl who upgraded to 5802's(new model) and missed their old 555's!
Highly impressed!
(Woops sorry I had follow-ed up and thanked everyone previously. Oh well double it!)
Congrats.
I run an original 555 myself and love it. Even though it probably needs a few fixes at this point. Even as an aging unit is sounds better than a lot of things out there. I agree with your assessment of its sound. These things are the TANKS of the audio world. They may not be the best but they run FOREVER and sound good enough!
Enjoy...
cnh
debussyj
06-02-2009, 02:53 PM
Best wishes! I have two original GFA-555, bought them when first released. I use them to power my Acoustat 2 + 2 electrostatic speakers and I love them. I also was lucky enough to live near the company warehouse during the 80's and 90's and the tech guys took good care of me as far as mods went. They are tanks and have lots of power. You couldn't pry them away from me! DJ
Tony M
06-02-2009, 06:27 PM
Thank you guys. He could use one of either model to push the pair and use his other leftovers for other systems:)..
I have Onkyo amps, M 504, m502, and a Citation amp(21?) that I plan on setting up soon. Can't wait to hear my sda srs2's through them. Oh, the new tweeters(rdo-194's) are smooth aren't they.:).waiting on two more..
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.6 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.