Buy Direct M-F 9am - 10:30pm EST 1-866-764-1801

Vist our Online Store
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 26 of 26
  1. #1

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    73

    Default Does this have enough juice ?

    I have an Onkyo 606 that puts out 90 watts/channel. If I get an RTI A7 (20-300 wpc), will my receiver do justice ?


    For optimal listening, what kind of power do I need ? 120wpc or more ? Please share your thoughts

  2. #2

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Montreal , Canada
    Posts
    179

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by matchan View Post
    I have an Onkyo 606 that puts out 90 watts/channel. If I get an RTI A7 (20-300 wpc), will my receiver do justice ?


    For optimal listening, what kind of power do I need ? 120wpc or more ? Please share your thoughts
    Speakers like the A7 like very much of clean power meaning that you should and it will help you to considered a receiver with pre-outs . If you like Onkyo check this Onkyo HT-RC180 , the good thing is that they are authorized seller by Onkyo , the bad is that they don`t ship to canada

  3. #3

    Member Sales Rating: (1)

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Descending toward the moon in the CLEM (Chinese Lunar Excursion Module), looking for Chang'e
    Posts
    10,089

    Default

    +1,

    Get an Onkyo 70X series with pre-outs and a used power amp of 200 watts X 2 for the A7s--you'll thank us later!

    That RC180 is selling for a terrific price...basically a HT in a box version of an 80X series--I think?

    You'll still need a power amp, though!

    cnh
    Last edited by cnh; 06-28-2011 at 05:56 PM.

  4. #4

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Flower Mound, TX
    Posts
    580

    Default

    At low volumes your current AVR will be fine. If you want to crank it to 11 then you will need quality amplification. IMO quality is more important than quantity when it comes to watts. I would get a quality amp with 120watts/channel over a not-quality amp with 300 watts/channel.

    Some amps to consider are B&K, Rotel, Parasound, Adcom, NAD or Proceed and many others I did not mention. Don't be afraid to go used as your dollar will go much farther. I have a B&K and am happy with it.

    One other option to consider is to get speakers that are easier to drive such as the RTiA5 and a good sub instead of the A7.
    AVR: Elite VSX-21TXH
    Amplifier: B&K 7250 Series ii
    Misc: Velodyne SMS-1
    Mains: RTi-10
    Center: CSi-5
    Rear: Boston DSi460
    Sub: SVS PC-Ultra
    TV: Panasonic TC-P58V10
    DVD: Panasonic DMP-BD60K

  5. #5

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    73

    Default

    I am looking for the best possible audio experience. Will an Onkyo 809 (135 wpc) give me stellar sound with the A7/9 or do I need to pair the 809 to something like emotiva xpc-3 ?

    Or how about Yamaha A2000 ? (130wpc)

  6. #6

    Member Sales Rating: (1)

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    chicago
    Posts
    12,763

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by matchan View Post
    I have an Onkyo 606 that puts out 90 watts/channel. If I get an RTI A7 (20-300 wpc), will my receiver do justice ?


    For optimal listening, what kind of power do I need ? 120wpc or more ? Please share your thoughts
    In surround mode, it drops to 80 watts I believe. Anyway, every speaker benefits from quality power, which most avr's seem to lack. Yes you can run them off that avr, will they sound their best ?....no, but they will work for you.

  7. #7

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    73

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tonyb View Post
    In surround mode, it drops to 80 watts I believe. Anyway, every speaker benefits from quality power, which most avr's seem to lack. Yes you can run them off that avr, will they sound their best ?....no, but they will work for you.

    What if I bi-amp the fronts ?

  8. #8

    Member Sales Rating: (1)

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    chicago
    Posts
    12,763

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by matchan View Post
    What if I bi-amp the fronts ?
    We probably get that question 10 times a week since the marketing guru's decided to use that phrase.
    Using a receiver for biamping is not bi amping, period, forget that marketing junk they shove at you. Your still using the same power supply no matter how you dice it.
    You can run those speakers from the 606, you just won't get everything out of them that they can do. My advice is to stay on the lower end of the rti series, or if you go bigger to keep the volume down while you save up for a newer receiver with preouts to add an amp.
    Good luck to you, and let us know what you wind up with.
    legacy Focus 20/20
    Butler tdb 2250
    Pioneer 59AVI
    Pioneer BDP 320
    50 in. Pioneer Kuro pdp 5010
    FX 500 surround
    Reality cables
    Pioneer elite vsx21
    Sonos-Cullen mod.
    Audio Metallurgy GA-0 digital
    PS Audio Quintet

  9. #9

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    73

    Default

    so even if i sacrifice 2 channels in my 7.1 to "biamp" the fronts, i really wont see much gain ?

  10. #10

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Montreal , Canada
    Posts
    179

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by matchan View Post
    so even if i sacrifice 2 channels in my 7.1 to "biamp" the fronts, i really wont see much gain ?
    A emo XPA-3 will give you 200 watts at 8 ohm all channels driven , tell me what you think ????

  11. #11

    Member Sales Rating: (1)

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    chicago
    Posts
    12,763

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by matchan View Post
    so even if i sacrifice 2 channels in my 7.1 to "biamp" the fronts, i really wont see much gain ?
    nope....it's not biamping anything.

  12. #12

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    73

    Default

    i cant quiet believe it - biamping is a farce ??

    So in theory, If I get a receiver like NR-809 or NR-3008 with 140wpc, then I am getting an increase of 50 wpc over the NR-606 which puts out 90wpc.

    From what I understand,to double volume I need 10 times more amplification. With a 50% increase(90 to 140), how does it benefit the RTI a7/9 etc to put out louder/cleaner sound etc ?

    If all receivers cant output the rated watts in full surround mode (thus the need for a power amp) , then do all of you with full range speakers use external amplification ?

  13. #13

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    80

    Default

    As a reference for you matchan - I initially paired my A9's with the Onkyo 807 (also with the CSi A6 center, Monitor 40 surrounds and a powered sub).

    I added an XPA-3 after a few months and did not really hear any difference. I've had the setup for about a year and a half now, maybe I would notice if I took the amp away, but I can't say it made a big change.

  14. #14

    Member Sales Rating: (1)

    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Quincy, MA
    Posts
    11,235

    Default

    Welcome to Club Polk Match.

    Receiver companies give out misleading statements as far as power goes. The truth is is that very very few will drive speakers to their full potential. This is why we always suggest that newbies get receivers that have preouts for separate amplification down the line. The more speakers you add the less power goes to each speaker.

    More power allows the speakers to operate to their full potential no matter what the volume is. It's not just about loudness, it's about hearing all the details that are on the recording. Receivers don't have that power to give, so you don't hear those finer details.

    Biamping off of a receiver is a waste of time since all you are doing is trying to get more power out of an already stressed amp within the receiver.

    Get a reciever that has all the bells & whistles that you want it to have & then get a 5-7 channel 200wcp amp either new or used, and you can be done with this particular upgrade since you can use the amp throughout all other upgrades to your system.
    Sunfire TGP III PrePro, Sunfire Cinema Grand Signature 405wpc 5 ch. Amp, Rotel RCD-1072 CDP, Onkyo TA2600 Tape Deck, Pioneer Elite 47-A DVD, Sony 32" XBR TV, Polk RTA-8T Main Speakers, Boston VR-920 Center Channel, Boston PV-600 Subwoofer, Polk DSW 400 Subwoofer, Polk FXi-3 Surround Speakers

  15. #15

    Member Sales Rating: (6)

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    15,399

    Default

    When it comes to power, ask yourself 3 questions:

    1. How big is the area
    2. How efficient are my speakers
    3. How loud do I want to listen

    Then consider, every 3dB's of increase in sound pressure level requires doubling of the wattage. Here's an example of a speaker with an efficiency of 89dB @ 1 watt/1 meter:

    dB SPL-----Watts Needed
    89dB-------1 watt
    92dB-------2 watts
    95dB-------4 watts
    98dB-------8 watts
    101dB------16 watts
    104dB------32 watts
    107dB------64 watts
    110dB------128 watts
    113dB------256 watts

    You get the idea...
    Last edited by steveinaz; 06-30-2011 at 12:08 PM.

    Source: C.E.C. CD-3300 CD Transport
    DAC: Benchmark DAC/PRE
    Linestage: Placette Audio Passive
    Power Amp: Parasound HCA-1500A
    Speakers: Harbeth Compact 7ES-3 Monitor/SVS PB12-NSD Subwoofer

    When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic. - Benjamin Franklin

  16. #16

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    174

    Default

    When I first purchased my LSI15's I was running them off of a Yamaha-RXV1700 reciever. The speakes sounded pretty flat and the bass has no punch. My Yahama allowed me to try bi-amping, so I did. I definately noticed a difference. It is not about loudness as it is about current. Speakers are an inductive load which require current to move the cone in and out. My yamaha has a discrete amplfier circuit for all 7 channels. The way I understood what I heard was that I was able to supply a bit more current to the speakers. Also the H.F and L.F drivers were now supplied by two different amplifier (current sources) circuits. Bottom line is it worked. However, past moderate volumes you could hear the limitations of using a receiver in this fashion. Bass would get sloppy, and sound was no longer balanced between the H.F and L.F drivers.
    However, now that I had the money and oppurtunity to purchase a used B&K Ref200.2 the difference pretty substantial. Bass is tight and punchy, improved soundstage, much more balanced frequency response no matter what the volume
    All recievers are not built the same, but if you purchase one w/ pre-outs you should be in good shape to upgrade in the future. Rome wasn't built in a day afterall...
    -------------[The Ever-Evolving System -------------

    LSI15's (PNF Symphony cabels, modded X-Over and subs), LSIC, LSI7's, Rega Apollo CDP (PNF ICON ICs, modified PS cct.), Yamaha RXV-1700 w/ ipod dock, B&K REF200.2 (fronts) Samsung BDP-1600, XBOX360, Patriot Box Office Media Player, 42" Samsung LCD.

  17. #17

    Member Sales Rating: (6)

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    15,399

    Default

    Bass notes require a lot of power, this is where high current amp designs shine.

    Source: C.E.C. CD-3300 CD Transport
    DAC: Benchmark DAC/PRE
    Linestage: Placette Audio Passive
    Power Amp: Parasound HCA-1500A
    Speakers: Harbeth Compact 7ES-3 Monitor/SVS PB12-NSD Subwoofer

    When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic. - Benjamin Franklin

  18. #18

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    73

    Default

    thanks all. I am planning to get an RTI A7 or A9 and upgrade my receiver (an Onkyo 606) to either a Onkyo NR 809/1008/3008. Each with about 135-140wpc.

    The 3008 is a high current amp.

    Will the 809/1008/3008 sufficiently drive the A7/A9.


    Specifically will the 3008 drive better than 809 ?

    Room is 20x10x10. Dedicated HT room. Sound treated.

    For HT , I currently cannot listen at over 40 out of 70 (606 does not have reference level volume indicators).

    So I am not necessarily looking for LOUDER, just CLEANER, BETTER, QUALITY.

    For 2 ch music via ipod, I can crank it to 60 or so before I start to feel its really loud..

  19. #19

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    65

    Default

    So I am not necessarily looking for LOUDER, just CLEANER, BETTER, QUALITYif this is the bottom line for you - follow above posts- pre outs and separate Amp
    why spend more for recvr power you wont use - 809 and amp

    good luck
    Onkyo TX-SR804 receiver
    Parasound 5250
    LSI 15's
    LSI C
    LSI FX's
    PSW1000 Sub
    OPPO 93
    Sony CDP-C315 CD
    Monster AC line cond
    Audioquest, Blue Jeans & Monster wires/connects
    40" Sony Bravia XBR6

  20. #20

    Member Sales Rating: (1)

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    chicago
    Posts
    12,763

    Default

    Adding an amp will definately get you cleaner, better quality,although that 3008 is plenty to drive those speaks. It's nice to have an amp for when you move up the speaker food chain and start getting into 4 ohm loads. Your call, you could swing either way.

  21. #21

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    White trash hills of WV
    Posts
    718

    Cool

    I don't think he's listening. I think he wants to run the speakers off a AVR, period. He keeps talking about running the system through the AVR with a Bigger AVR.

    What kind of speakers do you have now?
    If you're so concerned about the larger speakers, Why not go ahead and buy them and hook them up to your existing equipment and see if you like the way they sound. If you are unhappy about the way they sound after you buy them, then buy a bigger power supply.

    It seems like a lot of people worry about the watts the speaker can handle.
    You'll blow them faster from low power than high power.
    I know you are talking about high power and high current and all Onkyo are considered high current amps, so the 606 you have is already high current.

    You might not drive the receiver to clipping if you have more than 100 watts
    of high current power. You'd be surprised at the way power is delivered from an amp to make a decent sound pressure in a given room. You'd need a power meter to understand and see for yourself what I'm talking about.

    When taking about separates for large speakers like you want to buy, wattage is not the only factor, others factors are current and Dynamic Headroom. Polk builds a quality product despite the Chinese Connection.

    If I was running large Polks, current and headroom would be more of a focus for me rather than watts alone.

  22. #22

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    73

    Default

    Thanks all. The idea is to buy the best AVR I can afford as I know the 606 wont cut it.
    The dilema comes to these 2 options

    Best AVR I can afford today + Consider Amp in the future
    Go Separates right now , Get a lower end receiver + Get Amp now!

    Many people in this forum have reported not nearing a big difference with the RTI a7 and power amps (over Onkyo 809/3008).

    Just want my dollar to go far...

  23. #23

    Member Sales Rating: (1)

    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Quincy, MA
    Posts
    11,235

    Default

    I don't know what many people you are referring to, since they didn't post in this thread.

    Just about all of us have told you what you need to do to get the best sound from any speakers you might purchase now & in the future with plenty of good external amplification.

    If you don't want to believe/listen to it that's fine, it's your money & system.
    Sunfire TGP III PrePro, Sunfire Cinema Grand Signature 405wpc 5 ch. Amp, Rotel RCD-1072 CDP, Onkyo TA2600 Tape Deck, Pioneer Elite 47-A DVD, Sony 32" XBR TV, Polk RTA-8T Main Speakers, Boston VR-920 Center Channel, Boston PV-600 Subwoofer, Polk DSW 400 Subwoofer, Polk FXi-3 Surround Speakers

  24. #24

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    73

    Default

    Let me ask a specific question:

    As far as the differences in amplification between the 809 and 3008 , the only significant difference is the high current feature of the 3008. If the watts are similar/same then is it fair to say that both amps will drive the RTI a7 the same in terms of quality ?

  25. #25

    Member Sales Rating: (1)

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    chicago
    Posts
    12,763

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by matchan View Post
    only significant difference is the high current feature of the 3008.
    ........and isn't current what makes most any speaker perform it's best ? You answered your own question my man.

    Actually, it comes down to wanting great sound from a limited wallet, and thats cool,we all have our limits. You could go either way on the receiver,each on their own will drive the 7's fine. The 3008 will do it just a tad better though. You could always add an amp later when your wallet lets you if you go with a cheaper receiver,just make sure it has the preouts.

  26. #26

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    San Mateo, CA
    Posts
    1,559

    Default

    and FYI, even w/ a '125wpc' Denon 3311ci, my RTI A7s never sounded as good as when I got an outboard amp. Initially, adding a 250w x 2 (45 amp peak) amp introduced actual bass and soundstage to my music - I think my thread is still here from last year. 'Holy hell' was my reaction I think. Then upgrading to a 250w x 2 (60 amp peak) amp this year increased dynamics significantly and warmed up the high end a bit - so another incremental increase.

    But as tonyb said ..you can always add an amp later, when budget permits. Just know that there is room for improvement.
    Home Theater:
    KEF Q900s / MIT Shotgun S3 / MIT CVT2 ICs | KEF Q600C | Polk FXi5 | BJC Wire | Signal / AQ ICs | Shunyata / Pangea PCs | Pioneer Elite SC 57 | Parasound NC2100 Pre | NAD M25 | Marantz SA8001 | Schiit Gungnir DAC | SB Touch

    2 Channel:
    Polk LSi9 (xo mods), Polk DSW MicroPro 2000 sub | NAD c375BEE | W4S DAC1 | SB Touch | Marantz SA-8001 | MIT AVt 2 | Kimber Hero / AQ / Signal ICs | Shunyata / Signal PCs

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. need juice for new LSi's..which amp?
    By gshisme in forum Electronics
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 04-04-2003, 07:18 PM
  2. where's the juice?
    By trubluluc in forum The Clubhouse
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-13-2002, 02:29 PM
  3. Juice: Question RE: HSU VTF-2?
    By lax01 in forum The Clubhouse
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 05-31-2002, 10:54 PM
  4. Juice
    By Aaron in forum The Clubhouse
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-28-2002, 01:18 PM
  5. Hey Juice!
    By CHRIS in forum The Clubhouse
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-18-2002, 12:22 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts