Buy Direct M-F 9am - 10:30pm EST 1-866-764-1801

Vist our Online Store
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: 5A or 5B

  1. #1

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    25

    Default 5A or 5B

    Ok looking at some of the post here on this board I noticed that the Monitor 5 series speakers are completely different in design.
    Does anybody remember why Polk overlapped the midwoffer to the PR?
    Name:  DSCN0989.jpg
Views: 136
Size:  260.4 KB

  2. #2

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    739

    Default

    Early 5B's, I believe. The 5A's had the Peerless tweeter. The later versions of the 5B's used the SL2000.
    Display: Sony KV-34HS420 34" CRT
    Sources: Sony DVP-NS75H 1080i dvd player,
    Panasonic DMP-BDT110 blu ray player
    AVR: Harman Kardon AVR-435
    Amp: Adcom GFA-535
    Fronts: Polk RT16
    Center: Polk RT7
    Surrounds: Polk RT1000p
    Subwoofer: Polk PSW110

  3. #3

    Member Sales Rating: (17)

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Roselle Park, NJ
    Posts
    10,850

    Default

    But that's not an SL2000, it's a SL1000. So it could be a 5A that someone replaced the peerless with an SL1000
    Polk Audio SDA SRS 1.2TL's
    With new Exotic wood, Sonicaps, Mills & RDO198's - Born on 4-24-1989 and Signed by Matthew Polk!!!!


    My Polk SDA SRS 1.2TL's http://www.LASAREATH.com/


    It All Started here: http://tinyurl.com/lasareath2

    Part Deux: http://tinyurl.com/lasareath3

  4. #4

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    25

    Default

    So how would I make sure that the tweeter was not replaced with an Sl1000?
    Would I be able to ck the crossover?

  5. #5

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    25

    Default

    Back of speaker
    Name:  DSCN0991.jpg
Views: 99
Size:  532.4 KB

  6. #6

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    1,867

    Default

    That is interesting. I thought that only the 5A had the overlap PR and MW and the badge mounted to the bottom of the cabinet and either the SL-1000 or Peerless. Any idea what the mfg date was?
    Stan
    Stan

    Main 2ch:
    Polk RTA11TL (RDO198-1, XO and Damping Upgrades)
    Denon: DRA-835R, DVD-2910, DRM-800A; Monster HTS3600-MKII, Grado SR-225i

    HT:
    Denon AVR-888, Polk: RM7, PSW10

    Other stuff:
    Denon: DRA-825R, DCD-660, DRM-700A, DRR-780; Polk: S8, Monitor 5A & 5B, TSi100; Pioneer CT-6R, PL-530; Ortofon OM5E

  7. #7

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by skrol View Post
    That is interesting. I thought that only the 5A had the overlap PR and MW and the badge mounted to the bottom of the cabinet and either the SL-1000 or Peerless. Any idea what the mfg date was?
    Stan
    There are no other badges on these speakers.
    No stickers othere than whats on the terminal caps

  8. #8

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    532

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Barcus1963 View Post
    So how would I make sure that the tweeter was not replaced with an Sl1000?
    Would I be able to ck the crossover?
    It looks like a sl1000 to me. The peerless has a black dome and face plate. The sl1000 is silver with a clear dome like the one you have. If you want to verify, remove the four screws holding the tweeter in, remove it and read the sticker on the back.
    Polk SDA 2B-TL & CRS+

    NOTICE: Keyboard keystrokes do not convey emotions.

  9. #9

    Member Sales Rating: (16)

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    In A Van Down By The River
    Posts
    20,710

    Default

    See the sticker that says "5B"? Guess what, it's a 5B. Lots of variations of 5B's. My pair of 5B's had the sl2000 tweeter with a single fuse (now completely bypassed) but my cabinets are the newer cabs with the beveled edges. If I had to guess yours are a bit of a transitional model since they have the older cabinets and overlapping mid and passive you typically see for the 5A's. If you care to pull the midwoofer I'd be interested to know the model number MW6500, 6501 or 6502.

    The tweeter is an SL1000.

    H9
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass

    Pass Aleph 30; Adcom GFP750/Dared SL2000A; Adcom GDA600; MIT S3/Z Pc; SDA 1C; Squeezebox; Tubes add soul!

  10. #10

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by heiney9 View Post
    If you care to pull the midwoofer I'd be interested to know the model number MW6500, 6501 or 6502.

    The tweeter is an SL1000.

    H9
    It has a 6500 MW

  11. #11

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    25

    Default

    Now getting back to the OP, what was the reason for Polk to overlap the MW to the PR?
    Anybody know?

  12. #12

    Member Sales Rating: (16)

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    In A Van Down By The River
    Posts
    20,710

    Default

    If the MW6500 is genuine and not a replacement, everything on the surface points to it being a 5A, but Polk had so many transitional pieces that it is likely they ran out of 5A x-overs and used 5B x-overs to finish the run, so to speak. I wouldn't worry too much as the biggest differences in sound were the tweeters.

    H9
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass

    Pass Aleph 30; Adcom GFP750/Dared SL2000A; Adcom GDA600; MIT S3/Z Pc; SDA 1C; Squeezebox; Tubes add soul!

  13. #13

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by heiney9 View Post
    If the MW6500 is genuine and not a replacement, everything on the surface points to it being a 5A, but Polk had so many transitional pieces that it is likely they ran out of 5A x-overs and used 5B x-overs to finish the run, so to speak. I wouldn't worry too much as the biggest differences in sound were the tweeters.

    H9
    I love the way these sound!
    These Kick Butt

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts