Wow, lot's of food for thought. Something to try over the weekend.
Wow, lot's of food for thought. Something to try over the weekend.
I'm not sure where the Y connector would go... I'm working to connect a Luxman R113 (2 channel) to a powered sub.
Noting that there is no crossover built into the receiver, I'm trying to understand if I would simply connect the B posts to the Powered Sub and trim the bass to my A speakers with the Bass control knob.?
Also, if I were to run the speaker outputs of the Powered Sub to my main speakers, (connecting the sub with the high-level inputs from either A or B) would the sub present a parallel ohm load? Admittedly, I'm a noob, and as I read in this very post, the sub's high-level inputs present an impedence so high to the amp that it can be ignored.
Doing this would allow the smallish mains to shed the low freq's that make them gag sometimes, correct?
How cool to have so many folks like you to help newcomers! I make custom kites and learned a majority of that work from the best kitebuilder forum on the planet... www.kitebuilder.com.
Thanks for any help!
I forgot to mention...in this instance I'm using:
Luxman R-113 - 2-channel stereo receiver
Dayton Audio -Sub 800
Various and sundry 8ohm speakers...primarily Dayton Indoor/Outdoor
String, welcome to Club Polk. As was mentioned above, the article from PS Audio was flawed in several respects and shouldn't be taken seriously. The portion that you quote, relating to using a Y connector(which had nothing to do with his previous discussion), and strangely creating a 2 meter distance consideration, in any case has no application to your equipment. You have no sub output on the R113 which might make use of a Y connector.
Yes, connecting the speaker level outputs in the way you describe would create a parallel load, but as you've already read, the sub speaker level inputs present an impedance so high(typically in the tens of thousands of ohms)that the net effect on the combined impedance, which has been calculated mathematically in other threads, is practically zero.
No, unfortunately neither the R113 nor the Sub 800 have any provision which would allow for the highly desirable removal of the low bass from the mains(despite the Parts Express video which claims otherwise). Some of the previous replies shared a misconception that subs have an internal crossover which can provide for bass management on main speakers connected through the sub. As was pointed out, the control on the sub is only a low-pass filter which rolls the sub off above the frequency set, but forces the mains to attempt to run full-range. The control on the Sub 800 is incorrectly labeled as a "crossover"(and incidentally, the other control is incorrectly labeled "Gain", although it's simply a level control which varies the amount of incoming voltage which is subjected to the fixed gain of audio amplifiers). So, there's no provision with your present equipment to lessen the bass burden on your mains, which occasionally creates audible distortion. Modern HT receivers with full bass management provisions are of course available at moderate cost.
Just 'cuz HT's have bass management is no guarantee that the resultant sound is 'better'.
Everything is system dependent and experimentation for what works best with your rig, your room, your preferences is the best - don't be a lemming.
This talk of 'burden' on the mains and amp - phooey in my book if you have right components.
Give me better quality stereo components over an AVR any day of the week.
H9: If you don't trust what you are hearing, then maybe you need to be less invested in a hobby which all the pleasure comes from listening to music.
OK....I have read this thread three times now and have to throw this Q out there. If I want to add a DSW MicroPro to my current system, and the sub itself will be located physically OUTSIDE of the (integrated) amp to speaker line (or wire), then I should connect the sub to the end speaker with another run of speaker wire (to the sub's high-level input???)
And to add - REL's Speakon cable is basically a connection which runs from speaker terminal on your amp directly to the sub's high-level input?
Home Theater (7.1)
Mitsubishi HC4000 DLP PJ
Pioneer SC-05 AVR
Parasound HCA 1205
Monster 2500 Power
Polk DSW 600
Epos ELS8 Speakers & VTI 29" stands
Cambridge 640 v2 Integrated
Cambridge 640 v2 CDP
Yamaha T-1 Tuner
AQ Diamondbacks & Sidewinders ICs
AQ CV 6 Speaker Cables
Mains, Center Surround - Klipsch KHC - 6 In-Ceiling
Center - Polk cs400i
Surrounds - Monoprice in-ceiling
Sub - SVS PB10-ISD
Receiver - Pioneer VSX-1018ah-k
Server - Logitech Squeezebox Duet
Blu-ray - Sony BDP-S390
DVR - DirecTV Genie + AM21
Display - Samsung PN43E450 Plasma
Two Channel PC Rig (In progress)
Dell Studio 540s-->Pangea USB Cable-->HRT Music Streamer II DAC-->MIT AVT1-->Dayton DTA 100a-->MIT EXP2-->Polk Monitor 5 w/Peerless
When you run speaker wire from the high level amp outputs to the sub, in my case a sony sa 2500, and then run speaker wire from the sub to the right and left speaker, polk 75ts...do you/are you useing the subs built in amp or do you leave it turned off?
Welcome to Polk's forum. You would leave the sub's amp turned on, that way it can power the woofer. Your receiver is providing a signal to the sub, the receiver continues to power your speakers and the sub's internal amp powers the sub's woofer.
Thanks for the quick answer! That emboldens me to ask one more :) Years ago I connected a DAK passive sub woofer the same way, no amp in the sub to confuse the issue. At that point I worried about the impedence load on the receiver dropping to 4 ohms or less so I used a Russound wb 1 which is an impedence matching transformer. It is used between the receiver and sub to prevent the impedence from dropping below 8 ohms. Whar are your thoughts on that for the sony powered sub?
There's no need to be concerned, the powered sub has its own amplifier which usually has a very high input impedance, as a result it doesn't load down the receiver at all.
Thank you sir !
Reading this makes me want to get a 2nd VTF-15h and try this setup.
RTiA9 - CSiA6 - FXiA6 - Dual HSU VTF-15H
Parasound HCA-3500 - HCA-2003A - Marantz SR7005
Sim2 D60 - Dragonfly 106" Panny 500
LSi9 LSiC - RX-V3000
RT5000p Waiting in the Wings...
Obviously the guy knows little about audio.....much less spends any time researching anything.
The difference can be heard running the RT3000P subs off the high level input....the guy I bought mine from found that out during the demo when i was picking them up.
TV - Mitsubishi WD-73734 73" DLP 1080P | AVR - Onkyo TX-SR806(seeking a TX-NR818) | Source - Sony PS3 Slim 320GB | Front - PolkAudio RT3000p | Center -PolkAudio CS400i | Surround - PolkAudio F/X1000 | Sub - DIY Stereo Integrity HT 15 | Sub Amp - Behringer EUROPOWER EP2500
2 Ch Dreaming...hoping to purchase, build someday
OPPO 105 | Squeezbox Touch | Odyssey, BAT VK ,or HALO A21 amp | DIY Statements towers
1.The small amount of phase shift introduced by the main amp can be easily replicated using DSP.
2. Paul implies this technique should be used even when the main amp is a tube amp. Output transformers are anathema to deep bass. Taking this damaged signal and passing it on to your sub(s) is definitely NOT a good idea.
3. Paul believes that a passive interconnect is more degrading to sound than an amplifier. I don't.
Paul has another unusual sub hookup procedure that I happen to agree with under certain circumstances. He likes to run the mains full range, i.e. without a low pass filter. If your main speakers go deep and power handling isn't an issue this is a great idea. It's the same as using multiple subs to smooth out room nodes.
Last edited by audiomagnate; 09-28-2013 at 12:26 PM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)