Free Shipping on All Orders 1-866-764-1801

Vist our Online Store
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    North Texas
    Posts
    6,123

    Default Polk Audio Monitor 70 Series II

    Yeah, this is a little late to the party seeing as how NewEgg doesn't even stock them anymore. However, I recently picked up a pair in a package deal and felt the urge to do a little write-up on them. For the time being, they are still sitting in the Usher's place, though I'm about ready to make the swap again.... permanently.


    Let me preface this by saying that I've heard the Monitors on several occasions and never been impressed. They've always fit the niche nicely between the RTiA and the LSi series for me, striking a voicing similar to the older RTxxi series. While that timbre usually wins me over, I had never wanted to sit for more than a song while listening to Monitors. Hauling them around had me rolling my eyes (I'm used to dragging 100 lb. speakers around, not including the lead shot), I figured what the hell... lets give it a shot.

    There is no doubt this is a budget speaker. No spikes, bottom end connectors, and a cabinet that feels like you can crush it with one hand. I had no real expectations, but bit the bullet and let the amps warm up. I don't remember what song I started with, but I do remember eyes widening and thinking to myself... these are $300 speakers... holy ####. The center image was completely solid with nothing pulling my eyes towards the speakers themselves. Soundstage extended about a foot beyond each speaker with perceived depth hovering right between them.

    I went to some of my favorite demo recordings, such as Depeche Mode's "Welcome to my World", Phil Collin's "In the Air Tonight", Everlast's "Painkiller", and a couple of songs from Gotye. I also threw in a few acoustic songs and the Soundtrack from the Hunger Games. I continued to be impressed with the presence and overall performance these speakers provided me. The bass was rather punchy (though it didn't provide nearly enough oomph at lower frequencies), image separation was excellent, and the speakers had enough transparency to almost completely disappear. I was starting to think maybe, just maybe, these are some speakers I might have to keep. Performance was not far off from the Usher's at first glance, and these were easily the second best overall performance from any speakers I've paired with my system.

    I continued to listen and one downfall was readily apparent - these speakers became fatiguing over time. I do suspect that a higher powered amp would solve that issue, but they still sounded pretty damn nice. I took a break for a while and came back with some more music. This time, I decided to throw "Dancing Flute and Drum" from Dr. Chesky in the mix. I love this recording now because the echoing drums are able to make you feel like you're in a massive chamber listening to the performance live. This is where the separation between the Monitor 70 and the Usher 6311 became much larger. I was not getting the same atmosphere from the Monitors. While they did a decent job of providing a 'live' sound, the venue felt much, much smaller in comparison and the decay didn't last nearly as long.

    On top of that, when the drums hit, I found my eyes redirecting every time to the bottom half of the right speaker. With the 6311, it sounded like the drums were somewhere in space - with the Monitors, it was readily apparent that the sound was coming from the speaker. This issue also presented itself in any sound coming from just one speaker. If the sound was isolated (1 or 2 instruments playing), the transparency of the speaker was completely lost.

    One last thing that stood out to me during every song I listened to was that there was no depth to the music. It was like watching television - while you can still get a good picture that has a sense of depth, you are always able to tell its just a 2-dimensional image. The 'depth' of the Monitor 70 felt more like a simple difference in decibel level, rather than provide space between the objects like the 6311 does.

    After about a week of listening to these, I've decided to move them down the line. These have always been my least favorite Polks, but after this demo, I realized that the Monitor line, much like the rest of their line-up, really shines with some tubes behind them. If I had to live with a pair of 'modern' Polks, my first choice would be the LSiM 703. Second choice would be the Monitor 70 - even before the rest of the LSiM series. Why? The LSiM sound is rather 'lazy' to me. Nothing about them excites me - they play the music at a high level but don't draw me in to the music. The Monitor 70 had the ability to keep my butt planted on that couch and throw more music at it. Are these as good as the LSiM towers? Nowhere near.... but the Monitor 70 was more fun for me. They won me over, and I'm very happy that a close friend of mine is the one buying them from me.


    Pros: Big sound for little money, visually impressive, responds very well to changes upstream, strong separation, excellent center image

    Cons: Lack of transparency, 2 dimensional sound, lack of lower octaves, fatiguing over time, impact and presence are lackluster.

    Gear: See signature block.
    Usher CP-6311, Shuguang S200MK, Shuguang S845MK, Pioneer BDP-51fd, Essence Audio HDACC, Douglas IC's, Douglas Alpha bi-wire SC's, Pangea/Douglas PC's, Epson 8100

  2. #2

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    The heart of Texas
    Posts
    1,854

    Default

    Nice review Skip...my buddy really likes his. For me the most glaring immediate deficiency is the lack of deepish bass (at least if not powered properly...I've never heard them powered properly). But they are a great bang for the buck for an almost full range tower.

  3. #3

    Member Sales Rating: (1)

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Descending toward the moon in the CLEM (Chinese Lunar Excursion Module), looking for Chang'e
    Posts
    11,778

    Default

    Nice review. I couldn't agree more! I run these in my HT with the Onkyo below and they do a fine job there, so much so that I rarely consider upgrading the HT. They sounded best to me when I had a decent Denon and the Adcom GFA-555 on them, really opened up the bottom end and gave them a little more of that "depth" you found lacking. For the money, these towers are hard to beat, but they do need an amp PUNCH to sound their best.

    They can get fatiguing on the Onkyo in two channel, but regardless of its raw power, the Onkyo is still just an AVR that is a tad bright itself.

    Sound stage and imaging can be a little surprising for such an entry level speaker. Not sure I agree about the LSiMs though?

    cnh
    Last edited by cnh; 06-12-2014 at 11:47 PM.
    Onkyo TX-SR 805 System #1 HT AVR
    Office Two Channel: LSi-7s (Nakamichi CA-5, NAD 214, Pioneer BDP51fd)
    Vintage Polks: Polk Monitor 5As, Monitor 7Bs [HK 730], Monitor 10As [Marantz 2265], SDA-2Bs [Jolida JD-303, Jolida MV-MK4]
    Headphones: HD600, Q701, ATH-M50s etc. Bravo Audio Ocean amp., Onkyo P-304, Adcom GFA-555, Technics Direct Drive TT

  4. #4

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    It's not home, the N.W. will do for now
    Posts
    1,486

    Default

    Awesome revelation to the improved sound of the M70's.

    I had driven mine with an XPA-3 (200wpc) then upgraded my amp to the XPA-2 (300wpc) when I upgraded to the A9's.

    As I demoed my 70's to sell, they got to play with the XPA-2........my gosh man, I'd never heard them sound so good. As I pushed "Animals" and Skynyrds "Simple Man" and "Tuesday's gone with the wind" and then the kill box scene from Iron Man II, I'd never heard bass from them like that!!!!

    To be honest, I got hesitant to sell them. The kid saw that I started getting sellers remorse and he eagerly gave me my asking price which was a tad high so I had some wiggle room.

    Of course, I told him to be forewarned about my room set up and the additional power I had behind them, I told him to give me a shout if he couldn't get them to sound good. I never heard from him again.
    Draggn' knee is exhilarating, 150mph wheel standers are pretty cool too


    Home Theater-7.2
    Display-SamsungPN64D8000 | Receiver-Onkyo TX-NR807 | Source-OPPOBDP-103 | Amplifiers-Emotiva; XPA-2 x2, XPA-3 | Speakers: PolkAudio; mains-RTiA9, rears-RTiA9, center-CSiA6, surrounds-FXiA6 | Sub-Epik Empire x 2 | Interconnects-Emotiva


    Cans
    Grado RS2i

    2 Ch Rig
    First purchase will be; a pair of ? but I'd love a pair of SDA SRS

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Polk audio m12 monitor series
    By Irrenhaus in forum Speakers
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-25-2013, 10:56 PM
  2. Need Help Polk audio monitor 60s series II
    By mbergh22 in forum Speakers
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-31-2012, 05:49 PM
  3. Polk audio Monitor series speakers
    By JohnnyM7 in forum Vintage Speakers
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 01-31-2011, 06:03 AM
  4. Need Help Polk Audio Monitor 30 Series II vs M10
    By chaka1234 in forum Speakers
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-27-2011, 01:48 PM
  5. Need Help Polk Audio Monitor Series 10b
    By curtisbabyfund in forum Vintage Speakers
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 08-31-2009, 02:47 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts