Free Shipping on All Orders 1-866-764-1801

Vist our Online Store
+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 31 to 60 of 64
  1. #31

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Feeding Hills, MA
    Posts
    2,314

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Conradicles View Post
    Thank you! Also note from what I have heard from a few veteran members, it may be a good idea to raise the tweeter up a bit so that it is not in the center line of the woofers.
    Well it's a little late for that. What's the reason given? I would think all the drivers acoustic centers should be inline, but I'm by no means an expert.
    Home Theater/2 Channel:
    Front: SDA-2ATL http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/show...ished...Almost
    Center: Custom http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/show...hannel-Project
    Surrounds & Rears: Custom http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/show...rround-Project
    Sonicaps, Mills, RDO-194s-198s, Dynamat, H-Nuts, BH5
    Pioneer Elite VSX-72TXV, Carver PM-350, SVS PB2-Plus Subwoofer


    www.dhsspeakerservice.com

  2. #32

    Member Sales Rating: (10)

    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    WA State
    Posts
    3,475

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by westmassguy View Post
    Well it's a little late for that. What's the reason given? I would think all the drivers acoustic centers should be inline, but I'm by no means an expert.
    Could have fooled me. VERY nice work!!

  3. #33

    Member Sales Rating: (31)

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Long Island
    Posts
    14,790

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by westmassguy View Post
    Well it's a little late for that. What's the reason given? I would think all the drivers acoustic centers should be inline, but I'm by no means an expert.
    Actually, it depends. There is no simple answer.
    "He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And when you gaze long into an abyss the abyss also gazes into you." Friedrich Nietzsche

  4. #34

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Feeding Hills, MA
    Posts
    2,314

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ken brydson View Post
    Could have fooled me. VERY nice work!!
    Thanks Ken
    Home Theater/2 Channel:
    Front: SDA-2ATL http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/show...ished...Almost
    Center: Custom http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/show...hannel-Project
    Surrounds & Rears: Custom http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/show...rround-Project
    Sonicaps, Mills, RDO-194s-198s, Dynamat, H-Nuts, BH5
    Pioneer Elite VSX-72TXV, Carver PM-350, SVS PB2-Plus Subwoofer


    www.dhsspeakerservice.com

  5. #35

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Feeding Hills, MA
    Posts
    2,314

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Face View Post
    Actually, it depends. There is no simple answer.
    If you could elaborate a bit, it might help the next guy that builds one. I've seen center speakers with the tweeters raised, but also with everything inline. I could raise it up a bit, however the lower screw holes would then be exposed, and the plastic trim might interfere with the grill cutout. The Tweeter is surface mounted. The lip on the back side of the plastic face plate was ground off, so it sits about an 1/8" high.
    Home Theater/2 Channel:
    Front: SDA-2ATL http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/show...ished...Almost
    Center: Custom http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/show...hannel-Project
    Surrounds & Rears: Custom http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/show...rround-Project
    Sonicaps, Mills, RDO-194s-198s, Dynamat, H-Nuts, BH5
    Pioneer Elite VSX-72TXV, Carver PM-350, SVS PB2-Plus Subwoofer


    www.dhsspeakerservice.com

  6. #36

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Feeding Hills, MA
    Posts
    2,314

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by westmassguy View Post
    I knew from all the experimentation, that a Monitor 10 B crossover would be used, since it's designed for a single tweeter, dual woofer and PR configuration. I have the T/S parameters for most of the vintage woofers, the only item missing, is the SPL rating for the drivers, which will come into play later. The main problem, is the 10 uses 8 ohm nominal drivers. All the 8 ohm drivers have relatively high VAS figures. I could tune a smaller vented enclosure, but my cut-off would be somewhere in the 70 Hz range, which is not what I was looking for. I decided, that the only way to make this work, was to use the MW6502 4 ohm drivers, which have half the VAS of their 8 ohm brothers, and modify the 10 crossover. I also wanted to use two 6.5" PRs from a pair of 5JR+s I'd picked up off eBay. Instead of fabricating my own enclosure, I decided to find a suitable knock-down, CNC cut enclosure. As it happened, Parts Express was having a sale, and I found the perfect candidate. It's billed as a tower/large center, so I ordered it. The internal volume turned out to be almost exactly twice the size of two Monitor 5JR+s. This meant I could theoretically use 2 MW650s, plus the two 6.5 " PRs. When I began assembling the cabinet, I realized the CNC cuts, left a lot to be desired. Some fill, very careful Belt Sanding (Yes I do know how to use a belt sander), and some final block sanding were required to smooth things out. The front baffle was pre-cut before assembly. After assembly, the cabinet was internally sealed, and Hurricane Nuts installed. My next challenge, was to modify the Monitor 10 Crossover for use with 4 ohm drivers. The 10 uses two 8 ohm drivers in Parallel, for 4 ohm nominal resistance. The two 6502s would be wired in Series, for an 8 ohm nominal resistance. In order to keep the exact crossover frequency and slope, I would have to double the mh value for the inductor, and halve the uf value for the shunt capacitor. I found some suitable temporary parts in my ever growing parts bin, and installed a 18 gauge 3mh inductor, and made up the 17 uf cap. The hi-pass section had already been upgraded with Sonicaps and Mills resistors, and had the TL mod dove to it. I made the modifications, and put everything together for a dry run. After firing it up, It sounded quite good, except for a rather hot top end. The 10 crossover was designed for drivers with higher output, and a much larger enclosure. I decided there were two ways to balance the Tweeter and Woofer output. I could change the value of the .5 ohm resistor I installed in place of the Polyswitch. By raising the value, I could reduce the output of the hi-pass without adversely affecting the voicing of the tweeter. The other option is to install a much lower resistance Inductor, to increase the output of the two woofers. I found a 4ohm, 25 watt L-Pad, and temporarily installed it in place of the .5 ohm resistor. I used the common and 4 ohm leg, and preset it to .5 ohms. I fired up the speaker, and slowly increased the resistance until my ears told me it was in balance with the Woofers. The value turned out to be approximately 7.5 ohms. I wanted to test my other theory, and found a 15 gauge, 3.3 MH P-Core Inductor in my parts bin. I re-installed the .5 ohm resistor. I unwound the Inductor, until I reached the correct 3.1 mh rating on my LCR Meter. I disconnected the other inductor, and installed the P-Core. Woofer output increased, and to my ears, everything was balanced. I don't like P-Core Inductors, since they saturate easily, and have other distortion components. I decided to order a new Erse Hi-Q, Laminated Steel Inductor, which I've used in the past with great results. I also ordered a 17 uf Cap from Sonic to complete the permanent modifications to the crossover.
    I just realized there's a huge error/typo. The value of the resistor should have read .75 ohms, not 7.5 ohms
    Home Theater/2 Channel:
    Front: SDA-2ATL http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/show...ished...Almost
    Center: Custom http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/show...hannel-Project
    Surrounds & Rears: Custom http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/show...rround-Project
    Sonicaps, Mills, RDO-194s-198s, Dynamat, H-Nuts, BH5
    Pioneer Elite VSX-72TXV, Carver PM-350, SVS PB2-Plus Subwoofer


    www.dhsspeakerservice.com

  7. #37

    Member Sales Rating: (31)

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Long Island
    Posts
    14,790

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by westmassguy View Post
    If you could elaborate a bit, it might help the next guy that builds one. I've seen center speakers with the tweeters raised, but also with everything inline. I could raise it up a bit, however the lower screw holes would then be exposed, and the plastic trim might interfere with the grill cutout. The Tweeter is surface mounted. The lip on the back side of the plastic face plate was ground off, so it sits about an 1/8" high.
    Without modeling it in a design program or preferably taking actual measurements, I can't give a definite answer.
    "He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And when you gaze long into an abyss the abyss also gazes into you." Friedrich Nietzsche

  8. #38

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Feeding Hills, MA
    Posts
    2,314

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Face View Post
    Without modeling it in a design program or preferably taking actual measurements, I can't give a definite answer.
    I understand. I don't have modeling programs, and the only measuring instruments I have are my trusty Rat Shack Digital SPL Meter and my 56 year old ears.
    Home Theater/2 Channel:
    Front: SDA-2ATL http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/show...ished...Almost
    Center: Custom http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/show...hannel-Project
    Surrounds & Rears: Custom http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/show...rround-Project
    Sonicaps, Mills, RDO-194s-198s, Dynamat, H-Nuts, BH5
    Pioneer Elite VSX-72TXV, Carver PM-350, SVS PB2-Plus Subwoofer


    www.dhsspeakerservice.com

  9. #39

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Pearland Texas 77584
    Posts
    2,005

    Default

    Well I think you did a perfect job and if I did not go out and buy a CS6i (kick myself now) I would be gathering everything I need right now to do this.

  10. #40

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Feeding Hills, MA
    Posts
    2,314

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PolkieMan View Post
    Well I think you did a perfect job and if I did not go out and buy a CS6i (kick myself now) I would be gathering everything I need right now to do this.
    Thanks PolkieMan
    Home Theater/2 Channel:
    Front: SDA-2ATL http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/show...ished...Almost
    Center: Custom http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/show...hannel-Project
    Surrounds & Rears: Custom http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/show...rround-Project
    Sonicaps, Mills, RDO-194s-198s, Dynamat, H-Nuts, BH5
    Pioneer Elite VSX-72TXV, Carver PM-350, SVS PB2-Plus Subwoofer


    www.dhsspeakerservice.com

  11. #41

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Feeding Hills, MA
    Posts
    2,314

    Default

    I thought I'd update this thread since I've made some changes to the original design. In my original calculations, and after testing different combination of inductors and resistor values, I determined that in order to balance the tweeter and woofer outputs, I needed to either change the .5 ohm resistor which replaced the Polyswitch, and use a higher resistance inductor in the Lo-Pass, or leave the .5 ohm, and switch to a lower resistance inductor in the Lo-Pass. I opted for the Erse SuperQ low resistance inductor as the solution. Having over 6 months to evaluate the results. I decided to re-visit the crossover modifications. She sounded good, but I felt there was something missing. In addition, I wanted to upgrade the binding posts, and replace the factory 18 gauge wire, which I'd modified, with something a little more substantial. Believe it or not, even the short leads coming off the old binding posts were 18 gauge as well.
    I should preface this be saying all my new calculations were based strictly on the known DRC values for the drivers and inductors, not the nominal Impedance. The Monitor 10 used two 6503 drivers with a DCR of 6.54 ohms. Wired in parallel, that equals approximately 3.27 ohms The original 18 gauge, 1.55mh inductor measured approximately .6 ohms. The total DCR for the Lo-Pass was about 3.87, call it 3.9 ohms. When I switched to the 6502s wired in series, my DCR for the woofers was 7.04, call it 7 ohms. The Erse 16 gauge was .18 ohms when unwound to the correct 3.1mh. So my total DCR for the woofers and Inductor was 7.22 ohms. I felt his was a bit lower, than it should have been. I ordered an 18 gauge Jantzen 3.4mh Perfect Lay Air Core Inductor, and unwound it to exactly 3.1mh. The resultant DCR was exactly 1 ohm. Added to the 7.04 ohms for the two drivers put me precisely at 8 ohms. I knew from my previous experimentations, that a .75 ohm resistor would be needed in place of the .5 used to replace the Polyswitch, so I installed that ass well. After completing the other upgrades, I re-assembled everything and gave it a test run. Perfection is how I would describe it. Nothing was missing. Bass was strong, and perfectly balanced with the tweeter now. My feeling is, the lower overall DCR of the original, modified low pass resulted in a slightly lower crossover point for the woofers, even though their output had increased. This is what was "missing". I will say the overall SPL decreased slightly, and was expected. I recalibrated my system, and it's even better than before. Timbre matching is perfect with my 2ATLs.
    Last edited by westmassguy; 02-23-2014 at 10:15 AM.
    Home Theater/2 Channel:
    Front: SDA-2ATL http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/show...ished...Almost
    Center: Custom http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/show...hannel-Project
    Surrounds & Rears: Custom http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/show...rround-Project
    Sonicaps, Mills, RDO-194s-198s, Dynamat, H-Nuts, BH5
    Pioneer Elite VSX-72TXV, Carver PM-350, SVS PB2-Plus Subwoofer


    www.dhsspeakerservice.com

  12. #42

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    120

    Default

    I keep coming back to this thread to try and understand what you did here (which looks pretty great) and I have a simple question:

    I'd always thought that laying a stereo speaker on its side mess up with the dispersion and phase. Now maybe things are different with a single center speaker, and I see that various POLK speakers have the tweeters mounted different ways.

    Why did you choose to mount the tweeter 90 degrees from the "normal" Monitor 10 tweeter alignment?
    Receiver: ONKYO TX-SR806 7.1 surround 130 W/Ch THX Ultra2 Plus
    Mains: 2x Polk RTA 8TL's
    Surrounds: 2x Klipsch RS-41ii (because they fit perfectly over the door and window)
    Subwoofer: Speakerlab DAS-SW dual-voice-coil 10" '88 30Hz-150Hz
    Subwoofer Amp: ONKYO A-8019 AMP '85 100wpc
    Center: Polk CS245i
    Display: Samsung 55" UNC55-8000 3D LED
    Console: Xbox360
    DVR: custom MythTV rig w/ 3 tuners OTA
    Zone2: 2x Polk M4a '90

  13. #43

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Feeding Hills, MA
    Posts
    2,314

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zentish View Post
    I keep coming back to this thread to try and understand what you did here (which looks pretty great) and I have a simple question:

    I'd always thought that laying a stereo speaker on its side mess up with the dispersion and phase. Now maybe things are different with a single center speaker, and I see that various POLK speakers have the tweeters mounted different ways.

    Why did you choose to mount the tweeter 90 degrees from the "normal" Monitor 10 tweeter alignment?
    I'm not following you. How is the tweeter 90 degrees? On a normal Monitor 10 the tweeter is above the woofers. If I did that, my center would be twice as tall.
    Home Theater/2 Channel:
    Front: SDA-2ATL http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/show...ished...Almost
    Center: Custom http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/show...hannel-Project
    Surrounds & Rears: Custom http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/show...rround-Project
    Sonicaps, Mills, RDO-194s-198s, Dynamat, H-Nuts, BH5
    Pioneer Elite VSX-72TXV, Carver PM-350, SVS PB2-Plus Subwoofer


    www.dhsspeakerservice.com

  14. #44

    Member Sales Rating: (31)

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Long Island
    Posts
    14,790

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zentish View Post
    I'd always thought that laying a stereo speaker on its side mess up with the dispersion and phase. Now maybe things are different with a single center speaker, and I see that various POLK speakers have the tweeters mounted different ways.
    It does cause lobing.
    "He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And when you gaze long into an abyss the abyss also gazes into you." Friedrich Nietzsche

  15. #45

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Feeding Hills, MA
    Posts
    2,314

    Default

    Well if there's lobing, my lobes aren't hearing it
    Home Theater/2 Channel:
    Front: SDA-2ATL http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/show...ished...Almost
    Center: Custom http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/show...hannel-Project
    Surrounds & Rears: Custom http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/show...rround-Project
    Sonicaps, Mills, RDO-194s-198s, Dynamat, H-Nuts, BH5
    Pioneer Elite VSX-72TXV, Carver PM-350, SVS PB2-Plus Subwoofer


    www.dhsspeakerservice.com

  16. #46

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    120

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by westmassguy View Post
    I'm not following you. How is the tweeter 90 degrees? On a normal Monitor 10 the tweeter is above the woofers. If I did that, my center would be twice as tall.
    I was referring to the tweeter's vertical or horizontal alignment, not the relationship with the other drivers.

    Most of the vintage POLK tweeters I've observed are rectangular and mounted with wider length horizontal. My 5B's, the 7's and the 10's are all that way.

    Your kit has the tweeter mounted vertically.

    I was wondering why that was - what advantages there might be to that arrangement.
    Receiver: ONKYO TX-SR806 7.1 surround 130 W/Ch THX Ultra2 Plus
    Mains: 2x Polk RTA 8TL's
    Surrounds: 2x Klipsch RS-41ii (because they fit perfectly over the door and window)
    Subwoofer: Speakerlab DAS-SW dual-voice-coil 10" '88 30Hz-150Hz
    Subwoofer Amp: ONKYO A-8019 AMP '85 100wpc
    Center: Polk CS245i
    Display: Samsung 55" UNC55-8000 3D LED
    Console: Xbox360
    DVR: custom MythTV rig w/ 3 tuners OTA
    Zone2: 2x Polk M4a '90

  17. #47

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Feeding Hills, MA
    Posts
    2,314

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zentish View Post
    I was referring to the tweeter's vertical or horizontal alignment, not the relationship with the other drivers.

    Most of the vintage POLK tweeters I've observed are rectangular and mounted with wider length horizontal. My 5B's, the 7's and the 10's are all that way.

    Your kit has the tweeter mounted vertically.

    I was wondering why that was - what advantages there might be to that arrangement.
    I understand now what you meant. It was done for symmetry, nothing more. The Tweeter itself radiates equally in all directions, which is typical for a soft dome. Vertical or horizontal mounting won't affect the tweeters output. The same tweeters are using in a vertical mount on all the SDAs.
    Home Theater/2 Channel:
    Front: SDA-2ATL http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/show...ished...Almost
    Center: Custom http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/show...hannel-Project
    Surrounds & Rears: Custom http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/show...rround-Project
    Sonicaps, Mills, RDO-194s-198s, Dynamat, H-Nuts, BH5
    Pioneer Elite VSX-72TXV, Carver PM-350, SVS PB2-Plus Subwoofer


    www.dhsspeakerservice.com

  18. #48

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Feeding Hills, MA
    Posts
    2,314

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Face View Post
    It does cause lobing.
    Face, I've been reading up on that subject. Apparently in a horizontal MTM arrangement, the tweeter should be above the woofers forming a 45 degree angle from the centerline of the tweeter to the centerline of the woofers to reduce lobing. Unfortunately, due to the size of the RDO-198-1, the spacing between the woofers, and the height of the enclosure, that would be impossible. I could possibly modify the plastic face plate, and raise it up, but 30 degrees would probably be the best I could hope for.
    Home Theater/2 Channel:
    Front: SDA-2ATL http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/show...ished...Almost
    Center: Custom http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/show...hannel-Project
    Surrounds & Rears: Custom http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/show...rround-Project
    Sonicaps, Mills, RDO-194s-198s, Dynamat, H-Nuts, BH5
    Pioneer Elite VSX-72TXV, Carver PM-350, SVS PB2-Plus Subwoofer


    www.dhsspeakerservice.com

  19. #49

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Hartsville, SC
    Posts
    359

    Default

    This is all really cool and way above my pay grade! I'd love to build a center and have a surround system with my 10's being the mains and some 7's for rears with something like this for my center. Dream on! :)

  20. #50

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    120

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by westmassguy View Post
    I understand now what you meant. It was done for symmetry, nothing more. The Tweeter itself radiates equally in all directions, which is typical for a soft dome. Vertical or horizontal mounting won't affect the tweeters output. The same tweeters are using in a vertical mount on all the SDAs.
    That makes sense - thanks for the elaboration.

    I've been considering swapping my M5B mains with some 11T's, and then thinking that the 5's would make a nice center, either one of them standing up under the panel (it will just fit) or - and this is why I was asking about the tweeter alignment and such - laying both 5B's down, tweeter in and PR out as a double center.
    Receiver: ONKYO TX-SR806 7.1 surround 130 W/Ch THX Ultra2 Plus
    Mains: 2x Polk RTA 8TL's
    Surrounds: 2x Klipsch RS-41ii (because they fit perfectly over the door and window)
    Subwoofer: Speakerlab DAS-SW dual-voice-coil 10" '88 30Hz-150Hz
    Subwoofer Amp: ONKYO A-8019 AMP '85 100wpc
    Center: Polk CS245i
    Display: Samsung 55" UNC55-8000 3D LED
    Console: Xbox360
    DVR: custom MythTV rig w/ 3 tuners OTA
    Zone2: 2x Polk M4a '90

  21. #51

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Feeding Hills, MA
    Posts
    2,314

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zentish View Post
    That makes sense - thanks for the elaboration.

    I've been considering swapping my M5B mains with some 11T's, and then thinking that the 5's would make a nice center, either one of them standing up under the panel (it will just fit) or - and this is why I was asking about the tweeter alignment and such - laying both 5B's down, tweeter in and PR out as a double center.
    If the two 5s are laid next to each other. It will be very "hot" sounding on axis, with the two tweeters next to each other.
    I tried it with a pair of 4.6s
    Home Theater/2 Channel:
    Front: SDA-2ATL http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/show...ished...Almost
    Center: Custom http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/show...hannel-Project
    Surrounds & Rears: Custom http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/show...rround-Project
    Sonicaps, Mills, RDO-194s-198s, Dynamat, H-Nuts, BH5
    Pioneer Elite VSX-72TXV, Carver PM-350, SVS PB2-Plus Subwoofer


    www.dhsspeakerservice.com

  22. #52

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    NE MA
    Posts
    148

    Default

    Might it be better then to use just a single 5(JR in my case) as a center?
    Main HT: Polk Monitor 7 (1987-original owner) (L/R) / CSi40 (C) / RTi38 (SL/SR) / SVS 20-39PC (sub), Outlaw 975 pre/pro / Outlaw 7075 amp, Oppo BDP-93 Blu-ray, LG 42LM5800 teevee
    2ch: CRS+ (1987), Outlaw 1050 AVR, Denon DCM-420 CD
    Kitchen satellite 2ch: Polk M3II, Onkyo A-8037 integrated amp fed from Oppo, Yamaha TX-480 tuner
    Awaiting assignment: Model 5 (1978-Danish Peerless), Monitor 5JR (1988), Model 4 (1983-US Peerless), PSW202 (NIB), etc

  23. #53

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Feeding Hills, MA
    Posts
    2,314

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mikemokr View Post
    Might it be better then to use just a single 5(JR in my case) as a center?
    Yes, others have done that successfully.
    Home Theater/2 Channel:
    Front: SDA-2ATL http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/show...ished...Almost
    Center: Custom http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/show...hannel-Project
    Surrounds & Rears: Custom http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/show...rround-Project
    Sonicaps, Mills, RDO-194s-198s, Dynamat, H-Nuts, BH5
    Pioneer Elite VSX-72TXV, Carver PM-350, SVS PB2-Plus Subwoofer


    www.dhsspeakerservice.com

  24. #54

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Hartsville, SC
    Posts
    359

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mikemokr View Post
    Might it be better then to use just a single 5(JR in my case) as a center?
    I like this idea. Never thought about that.....

  25. #55

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    NE MA
    Posts
    148

    Default

    As I run through different permutations of future upgrades to my main and secondary systems, it occurs to me I could end up with two different 5JRs - one with TL mod and RDO-198-1 (I believe I saw someone saying they'd done this with the 5JR or possibly I'm thinking of the TL mod schematic for the 5B) for a center with CRS+ "4.1 TL" and the other with a 194 tweeter for a non-TL system. My 5JRs are stock with SL2000.
    Main HT: Polk Monitor 7 (1987-original owner) (L/R) / CSi40 (C) / RTi38 (SL/SR) / SVS 20-39PC (sub), Outlaw 975 pre/pro / Outlaw 7075 amp, Oppo BDP-93 Blu-ray, LG 42LM5800 teevee
    2ch: CRS+ (1987), Outlaw 1050 AVR, Denon DCM-420 CD
    Kitchen satellite 2ch: Polk M3II, Onkyo A-8037 integrated amp fed from Oppo, Yamaha TX-480 tuner
    Awaiting assignment: Model 5 (1978-Danish Peerless), Monitor 5JR (1988), Model 4 (1983-US Peerless), PSW202 (NIB), etc

  26. #56

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Feeding Hills, MA
    Posts
    2,314

    Default

    Whatever you have up front, should be timbre matched as close as possible.
    Home Theater/2 Channel:
    Front: SDA-2ATL http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/show...ished...Almost
    Center: Custom http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/show...hannel-Project
    Surrounds & Rears: Custom http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/show...rround-Project
    Sonicaps, Mills, RDO-194s-198s, Dynamat, H-Nuts, BH5
    Pioneer Elite VSX-72TXV, Carver PM-350, SVS PB2-Plus Subwoofer


    www.dhsspeakerservice.com

  27. #57

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    NE MA
    Posts
    148

    Default

    Yep, that's my plan. Most likely my main HT will end up with 198s in the fronts and center, and a secondary system will start with all SL2000s and end up upgraded to all 194s. I might just have use for a third system at some point and could even do all Peerless across the front there - Denmark in L/R vs US in the center, but I suspect that wouldn't be an issue.
    Main HT: Polk Monitor 7 (1987-original owner) (L/R) / CSi40 (C) / RTi38 (SL/SR) / SVS 20-39PC (sub), Outlaw 975 pre/pro / Outlaw 7075 amp, Oppo BDP-93 Blu-ray, LG 42LM5800 teevee
    2ch: CRS+ (1987), Outlaw 1050 AVR, Denon DCM-420 CD
    Kitchen satellite 2ch: Polk M3II, Onkyo A-8037 integrated amp fed from Oppo, Yamaha TX-480 tuner
    Awaiting assignment: Model 5 (1978-Danish Peerless), Monitor 5JR (1988), Model 4 (1983-US Peerless), PSW202 (NIB), etc

  28. #58

    Member Sales Rating: (16)

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Sunny SoCal
    Posts
    2,405

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mikemokr View Post
    Might it be better then to use just a single 5(JR in my case) as a center?
    I tried this and hated it. The 5jr just wasn't designed for use as a center speaker. It can't handle the load and stay up with the rest of my system. I also found it lacked the detail I wanted in a center speaker.

    I would love to hear a custom timbre-matched center speaker but quite honestly, it would truly have to shine to out-perform the LSiM706c.
    _____________________________________________
    Home Theater: polkaudio Modded SDA SRS 2.3TL's, LSiM706c, 4 X TC265i Rears, SVS PB12 Plus/2
    Pioneer Elite SC-67, Sunfire Signature Cinema Grande 400, Oppo BDP-83

  29. #59

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Feeding Hills, MA
    Posts
    2,314

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dpowell View Post
    I tried this and hated it. The 5jr just wasn't designed for use as a center speaker. It can't handle the load and stay up with the rest of my system. I also found it lacked the detail I wanted in a center speaker.

    I would love to hear a custom timbre-matched center speaker but quite honestly, it would truly have to shine to out-perform the LSiM706c.
    Mine shines pretty damn good, and matches my SDAs perfectly
    Home Theater/2 Channel:
    Front: SDA-2ATL http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/show...ished...Almost
    Center: Custom http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/show...hannel-Project
    Surrounds & Rears: Custom http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/show...rround-Project
    Sonicaps, Mills, RDO-194s-198s, Dynamat, H-Nuts, BH5
    Pioneer Elite VSX-72TXV, Carver PM-350, SVS PB2-Plus Subwoofer


    www.dhsspeakerservice.com

  30. #60

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh, Pa.
    Posts
    118

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mikemokr View Post
    Might it be better then to use just a single 5(JR in my case) as a center?
    I love those little speakers!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Need Help Monitor 60, CS1 Series II Center Channel, and ONKYO TX-SR607 7.2-Channel
    By Andrijano in forum Basic Hookup/Wiring Questions
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-14-2013, 01:06 PM
  2. Monoblock or bridgeable 2 channel amplifier for center channel
    By rengnath in forum Wanted (WTB) Classifieds
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-27-2011, 12:10 PM
  3. Need Help Monitor 10A crossover for center channel project
    By slack56 in forum Vintage Speakers
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-09-2009, 01:36 PM
  4. New 2-channel DIY speaker project
    By gatemplin in forum DIY, Mods & Tweaks
    Replies: 81
    Last Post: 09-08-2005, 07:37 PM
  5. New 2-channel DIY speaker project
    By gatemplin in forum 2 Channel Audio
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 08-03-2005, 12:37 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts