Buy Direct M-F 9am - 10:30pm EST 1-866-764-1801

Vist our Online Store
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 97

Thread: New Arivals...

  1. #1

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    26

    Default New Arivals...

    I Just Inherited some Vintage audio (My Favorite Uncle Passed away :( )and have some questions. items are 2 polk audio sda srs 2s both are in mint cond and work very well. The other is a pioneer sx 1080 also in very good cond. is there any thing i should know about maintaining this equipment??

  2. #2

    Member Sales Rating: (13)

    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    The Mars Hotel
    Posts
    27,657

    Default

    Welcome to the forum.

    **** can the Pioneer, get some real power. The SDA's will benefit from a tweeter upgrade available from Polk, part # RD0194-1.

    Sorry about your uncle.
    'Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."

  3. #3

    Member Sales Rating: (4)

    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    5,845

    Default

    F1- I have to very much disagree with your opinions of the 1080. http://www.classicaudio.com/value/pio/SX1080.html

    120 REAL Watts of output, a real workhorse, for sure. Back when Pioneer meant something...
    Ludicrous gibs!

  4. #4

    Member Sales Rating: (11)

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Spokane, Washington
    Posts
    15,830

    Default

    how deep do you want to get into this hobby for the best sound for those SDA SRS'2s?

    the best thing you can do is to for best sound if you want to invest in proper stereo equipment for them is to get a pre amp and a power amp. that will yield the best sound for you.

    If you're not looking to spend that much... then a decent high current receiver will be another option. a good receiver you're looking at around $800 and up. for a the amp/pre amp you're looking around $1500 and up.. this is new of course. less $$ if you buy used gear. You have several options for mixing and matching gear.

    *oh yeah. that silver faced Pioneer could be worth something right now.. as lots of vintage Pioneer stereo equipment has a large following. so don't ditch it before you realize what you have. :p

  5. #5

    Member Sales Rating: (4)

    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    5,845

    Default

    I honestly don't think he needs to upgrade anything. I'm sure that vintage Pioneer receiver sounds absolutely awesome with those SRS's. It's got more than enough grunt to push them around.
    Ludicrous gibs!

  6. #6

    Member Sales Rating: (13)

    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    The Mars Hotel
    Posts
    27,657

    Default

    Noah, Pioneer never meant something.
    'Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."

  7. #7

    Member Sales Rating: (11)

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Spokane, Washington
    Posts
    15,830

    Default had to include this pic

    silver faced Pioneer gear :D
    Attached Images  

  8. #8

    Member Sales Rating: (3)

    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Cape Cod, MA
    Posts
    602

    Default

    Don't be so hasty with the Pioneer. It was built during the '70's golden era of stereo equip. Cost about $750 back then. It is a beast (in a good way) piece of equipment with 120 wts/chl. and very good stats. It may not be the "best" amp for your Polks but it sure is a very good receiver to hold on to if you have a need. Check out this web site for more info

    http://www.silverpioneer.netfirms.com/

  9. #9

    Member Sales Rating: (3)

    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Cape Cod, MA
    Posts
    602

    Default

    Wow, in the 5 minutes it took me to make a post after F1's, it looks like a lot of others also came to the rescue of the Pioneer

  10. #10

    Member Sales Rating: (4)

    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    5,845

    Default

    Hell, even my SX-450 with 15wpc sounds good, until you top it out. I can't imagine what 120wpc in vintage pioneer would sound like, but I would imagine "good" would be accurate. danger boy- I love that pic! awesome!
    Ludicrous gibs!

  11. #11

    Member Sales Rating: (7)

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    lookin' for fava beans and a nice chianti
    Posts
    12,404

    Default

    That pic? Hmmmm a lot of mediocre sound.

    Will the Pioneer drive the SDA's? Sure.

    For my tastes, a receiver is never the answer. SDA's deserve good separates. Others may not agree which is perfectly within thier province.

    BDT
    I ALWAYS use an ass-gasket. Never hover because of splash down and back splatter. I also float landing pad made from TP for a soft landing to avoid the above. One can never be too cautious when dealing with the general public. - RonP

  12. #12

    Member Sales Rating: (4)

    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    5,845

    Default

    I will agree that separates would be better, as I'm on my own quest for separates. However, F1 was implying that the 1080 was worthless, which it certainly is NOT.
    Ludicrous gibs!

  13. #13

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    26

    Default

    I do not plan on seperating this equipment the pioneer has pre amp out any amp suggestions around 500 wpc..

  14. #14

    Member Sales Rating: (1)

    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Quincy, MA
    Posts
    11,235

    Default

    Hi kkowal & welcome. If you like the equipment & the sound that it is producing then just dust it off every now & again & you will be fine. My condolences for your Uncle.

    Fellas, he didn't say boo about upgrading, tweaking, ect ect. Is there anything else he needs to do to maintain the equipment that he has? That was the question.
    Sunfire TGP III PrePro, Sunfire Cinema Grand Signature 405wpc 5 ch. Amp, Rotel RCD-1072 CDP, Onkyo TA2600 Tape Deck, Pioneer Elite 47-A DVD, Sony 32" XBR TV, Polk RTA-8T Main Speakers, Boston VR-920 Center Channel, Boston PV-600 Subwoofer, Polk DSW 400 Subwoofer, Polk FXi-3 Surround Speakers

  15. #15

    Member Sales Rating: (7)

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    lookin' for fava beans and a nice chianti
    Posts
    12,404

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nadams
    I will agree that separates would be better, as I'm on my own quest for separates. However, F1 was implying that the 1080 was worthless, which it certainly is NOT.
    I'm not going to speak for Jesse but I would have said much the same thing. IMO, the Pioneer is not in the same league as the SRS's. So, yes, move it down the road and bag decent separates.

    In terms of power, depends on your budget but more power doesn't always equate to better. I'd look for a nice used tube preamp and a decent power amp with a couple hundred wpc.

    Now, if maintaining it is the question, as Cathy pointed out....dust it off. If you aren't getting any static out of it, no worries. I might invest in some Caig deoxit and contact cleaner and so forth...but, if it ain't broke, don't fix it.

    BDT
    Last edited by TroyD; 11-16-2005 at 12:49 PM.
    I ALWAYS use an ass-gasket. Never hover because of splash down and back splatter. I also float landing pad made from TP for a soft landing to avoid the above. One can never be too cautious when dealing with the general public. - RonP

  16. #16

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    53

    Default

    I've got a Pioneer SX-980. Power wise it'll push just about anything. It's a real beast for power. Still compared to my seperates it certainly isn't in the same league. I sure wouldnt toss it though. I use mine with my computer. Real happy with it there.

  17. #17

    Member Sales Rating: (11)

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Spokane, Washington
    Posts
    15,830

    Default

    I wasn't saying he should power his SDA's with the Pioneer.. all i'm saying it use the Pionner somewhere else.. another vintage stereo rig perhaps. ;)

  18. #18

    Member Sales Rating: (17)

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    7,626

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kkowal
    I do not plan on seperating this equipment the pioneer has pre amp out any amp suggestions around 500 wpc..
    Good idea. Use the pre-out and get an amp with at least 200 high current watts per channel and you'll get the SRS 2s to sing. I know, I own them and just went from about 125 high current watts to 315 high current watts and it made a big difference in dynamics due to the added headroom from the Parasound.

    I'm sure that several here will attest to Parasound amps and SDAs as a good combo. You can find a nice PSound amp on Audiogon.com in the $350-$600 range most of the time.

    Sorry you had to acquire the SDAs that way. Keep your Uncle's gear in good shape and in the family.

    Welcome to Club Polk :)
    "SOME PEOPLE CALL ME MAURICE,
    CAUSE I SPEAK OF THE POMPITIOUS OF LOVE"

  19. #19

    Member Sales Rating: (6)

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    15,408

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nadams
    F1- I have to very much disagree with your opinions of the 1080. http://www.classicaudio.com/value/pio/SX1080.html

    120 REAL Watts of output, a real workhorse, for sure. Back when Pioneer meant something...
    Yep, I'll second that. The SX-1080 was a gem.

    Source: C.E.C. CD-3300 CD Transport
    DAC: Benchmark DAC/PRE
    Linestage: Placette Audio Passive
    Power Amp: Parasound HCA-1500A
    Speakers: Harbeth Compact 7ES-3 Monitor

    Stop dissecting and start listening. - Steve in Arizona

  20. #20

    Member Sales Rating: (13)

    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    The Mars Hotel
    Posts
    27,657

    Default

    The only gear Pioneer made that is worth a mention were the Series 20 amps and even those are easily surpassed.

    "Pioneer introduced a line of true audiophile components in the late 1970s known as Series 20. These components used the latest engineering and displayed the finest quality parts Pioneer had ever manufactured."

    The M-22 and M-25 amps,
    http://www.silverpioneer.netfirms.com/m22_amplifier.htm
    'Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."

  21. #21

    Member Sales Rating: (11)

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Spokane, Washington
    Posts
    15,830

    Default

    Jesse,
    i'm sure a lot of the Pioneer equipment isn't true audiophile components.. but you do have to admit that they must have done something right. they sure have a big following.

    While not reference quality.. i love my analog TX-9500 II tuner. it's very sensitive and sounds quite good.

    but to each his own.

  22. #22

    Member Sales Rating: (17)

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Northern Colorado
    Posts
    11,914

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by F1nut
    Noah, Pioneer never meant something.
    F1, You are absolutely wrong on this one. Wrong I tell ya! I'm not refering to the receiver or the rack o silver either.

    Before that Pioneer made tube equipment. I once made a bid of $900 on a 50wpc EL-34 amplifier. Looked pretty cool!

    madmax
    Vinyl, the final frontier...

    Avantgarde horns, 300b tubes, thats the kinda crap I want... :D

  23. #23

    Member Sales Rating: (13)

    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    The Mars Hotel
    Posts
    27,657

    Default

    Chuck...... :p
    'Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."

  24. #24

    Member Sales Rating: (16)

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    In A Van Down By The River
    Posts
    20,710

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by F1nut
    The only gear Pioneer made that is worth a mention were the Series 20 amps and even those are easily surpassed.

    "Pioneer introduced a line of true audiophile components in the late 1970s known as Series 20. These components used the latest engineering and displayed the finest quality parts Pioneer had ever manufactured."

    The M-22 and M-25 amps,
    http://www.silverpioneer.netfirms.com/m22_amplifier.htm
    Those series 20's look pretty bad ass. I like looking at those big caps and transformers. Saw one of these recently on E-bay. Pioneer has always been middle of the road to me. I was over at audio karma for awhile and I just have to laugh at how many people think Pioneer, Sansui and Marantz are the ****. I can't read anymore posts from audio karma....it just boggles the mind that these people really believe that those vintage pieces have no equal today. Sure the stuff was built like a tank and sounded good for the day....but that day passed along time ago. The Pioneer Sx-1080 is capable but nothing to write home about, very average and probably better than today's economy (read cheapo) receivers.

    Hang on to it or go over to audio karma and sell it for a big profit because there are some guys over there that will give you top $$$ plus for the SX-1080. It certainly is a very desireable model....I have no clue why. I had the same year SX something way back as my first receiver and it crapped out eventually.

    H9
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass

    Pass Aleph 30; Adcom GFP750/Dared SL2000A; Adcom GDA600; MIT S3/Z Pc; SDA 1C; Squeezebox; Tubes add soul!

  25. #25

    Member Sales Rating: (17)

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    7,626

    Default

    Now don't be bad mouthing Marantz or putting them in the same class as Pioneer. Marantz kicks Pioneer's arse :D
    "SOME PEOPLE CALL ME MAURICE,
    CAUSE I SPEAK OF THE POMPITIOUS OF LOVE"

  26. #26

    Member Sales Rating: (7)

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    lookin' for fava beans and a nice chianti
    Posts
    12,404

    Default

    [QUOTE=danger boy].. but you do have to admit that they must have done something right. they sure have a big following.
    QUOTE]

    So does Bose...

    BDT
    I ALWAYS use an ass-gasket. Never hover because of splash down and back splatter. I also float landing pad made from TP for a soft landing to avoid the above. One can never be too cautious when dealing with the general public. - RonP

  27. #27

    Member Sales Rating: (16)

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    In A Van Down By The River
    Posts
    20,710

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ND13
    Now don't be bad mouthing Marantz or putting them in the same class as Pioneer. Marantz kicks Pioneer's arse :D
    Certain models.....I'd agree. I'm basically commenting on what "others" views are over at AK. I'm also not meaning to cut anyones gear down. If he likes the SX-1080 then Kudo's for him. But some of those guys over at AK are just plain nuts in their Pioneer, Sansui, Marantz worship....scarey stuff :D :p

    H9
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass

    Pass Aleph 30; Adcom GFP750/Dared SL2000A; Adcom GDA600; MIT S3/Z Pc; SDA 1C; Squeezebox; Tubes add soul!

  28. #28

    Member Sales Rating: (1)

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Spotsylvania, Virginia
    Posts
    553

    Default

    well this thread escelated rather quickly..........

    Back to the main question, Hook em' up and enjoy, you wont be disapointed with those speakers... once you enjoy them for a while and you get addicted to this hobby (you will) then you can move on to all of the advise that was kinda thrown at you right away in this thread. But for now just relax and enjoy the music, once your in too deep it is extremely hard to be satisfied with whatever equipment you have.

  29. #29

    Member Sales Rating: (16)

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Six 'Burgh (Pittsburgh), PA
    Posts
    6,452

    Default

    Welcome to the Forum. Sorry about your uncle. Enjoy the SDA's. The Pioneer SX-1080 is not audiophile quality. But it is a decent amp that will power those SDA's until you can get something better.
    Carl

  30. #30

    Member Sales Rating: (11)

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Spokane, Washington
    Posts
    15,830

    Default

    [QUOTE=TroyD]
    Quote Originally Posted by danger boy
    .. but you do have to admit that they must have done something right. they sure have a big following.
    QUOTE]

    So does Bose...

    BDT
    yeah but Bose sounds terrible. I don't think you can say all Pioneer sounds bad. there is a difference. you can twist the facts any which way you want to crunch the numbers in your favor.
    I'm not defending Pioneer.. they had their hey day in the 70's... like Marantz and Sansui did.. their time may have passed. I'm not sure.

    Troy stating something like that does no good. IN here an many other audio forums you'll find people that like every flavor of gear out there under the sun. and if you ask each and every person. their **** is the best.

    I happen to like vintage Pioneer gear. all of it? Nope of course not.. but the higher end stuff was good in it's day.. and by todays standards is outdated.. some of it still sounds good to me. Can you campare it to todays gear? Of course not... it's technology is way outdated... twenty or thirty years old. But you can't say a blanket statement that it all is bad.

    I like some Marantz gear.. is all of it good, nope. Is all Marantz gear bad? yeah a lot of it is.. esp most of their stuff from the past 20 yrs. But at one time... Marantz was the gear to have if you were a true audiophile.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts