Buy Direct M-F 9am - 10:30pm EST 1-866-764-1801

Vist our Online Store
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    177

    Default Polk's Best Older Bookshelf Speaker

    Is the RT55 a better sounding speaker than the RT7? I have heard conflicting viewpoints. Some say the combo of the woofer and tweeter in the RT7 is about as good as you can get in a bookshelf, but the RT55 has a lot more support.

    Second question. Is the Lsi 9 the best bookshelf speaker Polk ever made? If not which model?

  2. #2

    Member Sales Rating: (13)

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Central Illinois
    Posts
    696

    Default

    Well I guess it depends on the size of your bookshelf, but for smaller speakers in the monitor line I always thought that the Monitor 5B did quite a nice job.

  3. #3

    Member Sales Rating: (16)

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    In A Van Down By The River
    Posts
    20,711

    Default

    +1 on the 5b's. Simply a great sounding speaker. Perhaps better than most if not all Polk's recent bookshelf efforts (not including the Lsi's). Lsi's are in a different catagory. Add the new tweets to an old pair of 5b's and prepare to be blown away. Even with the original sl2000 they are great.

    H9
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass

    Pass Aleph 30; Adcom GFP750/Dared SL2000A; Adcom GDA600; MIT S3/Z Pc; SDA 1C; Squeezebox; Tubes add soul!

  4. #4

    Member Sales Rating: (4)

    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    661

    Default

    I'd have to agree with the consensus' above. The 5B's are my favorite as well. Although they do push the size limit for "bookshelf". Can't remember which speaker was the one with the same arrangement as the 5B but with the smaller, 6 1/2", radiator on the bottom but when I listened to both, years ago, the 5B killed it in the bass realm. Just never saw the other bookshelf as being "practical" when the 5B was sitting right next to it. But..., it's all what a guy likes, or hears.

    Just wish Polk still made bookshelf speakers the old fashioned way with radiators. It may have been cheating but I like it. I haven't heard the LSI 9's however but with the price point I'll stick with the 5B's I have. Maybe someday....

  5. #5

    Member Sales Rating: (16)

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    In A Van Down By The River
    Posts
    20,711

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by smglbrth
    I'd have to agree with the consensus' above. The 5B's are my favorite as well. Although they do push the size limit for "bookshelf". Can't remember which speaker was the one with the same arrangement as the 5B but with the smaller, 6 1/2", radiator on the bottom but when I listened to both, years ago, the 5B killed it in the bass realm.

    Just wish Polk still made bookshelf speakers the old fashioned way with radiators. It may have been cheating but I like it. I haven't heard the LSI 9's however but with the price point I'll stick with the 5B's I have. Maybe someday....
    I believe those were the 5jr's. I really like the sound of the passive radiators over a typical ported design. Obviously for compactness the port is the way to go. Although I must say the Lsi's being ported certainly is no limitation as I would take the Lsi-9 over any old monitor speaker. It all comes down to design and execution. Where size isn't a limitation I'd typically take a PR over a port design (in most cases).

    H9
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass

    Pass Aleph 30; Adcom GFP750/Dared SL2000A; Adcom GDA600; MIT S3/Z Pc; SDA 1C; Squeezebox; Tubes add soul!

  6. #6

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Orion arm of the milkyway galaxy
    Posts
    598

    Default

    Personally, I think the RT7 is better, but I may be a little biased. ;) In the nine years I've had them, I never felt the need to replace them.
    Last edited by speakergeek; 01-21-2006 at 01:47 PM.

  7. #7

    Member Sales Rating: (7)

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    lookin' for fava beans and a nice chianti
    Posts
    12,404

    Default

    RT7....all the way.

    BDT
    I ALWAYS use an ass-gasket. Never hover because of splash down and back splatter. I also float landing pad made from TP for a soft landing to avoid the above. One can never be too cautious when dealing with the general public. - RonP

  8. #8

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    177

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by polksda
    Well I guess it depends on the size of your bookshelf, but for smaller speakers in the monitor line I always thought that the Monitor 5B did quite a nice job.
    Nice webpage, thanks for hosting it.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts