Good morning people. Been a while since I last posted to this forum. I recently did a direct A/B comparison of the Rti6 and the Paradigm Mini Monitor v.4. I have been a huge Paradigm fan for several years now BUT I preferred the sound of the Rti6. The bottom end was more defined and controlled whereas the Mini was boomy and slighlty on the sloppy side of things. The Rti6 was also more open and engaging. The Mini sounded a bit blanketed and rolled off. However, I concluded that the Rti6 was better than the Mini Monitor v.4 but not as good as The Studio 20 v.3's that I do own. I am sure the Rti4 would also perform very well. My question is about the Polk Monitor line. I have noticed that most forum members prefer the Rti line to the Monitor line. I can certainly understand that when listening to the Monitor 30's. However, the Monitor 40's IMHO are quite nice. For some reason or another I really like the way the 40's sound. Sure, you will need a powered sub BUT when mated with a good powered sub the 40's rock. So, is there anybody here that has found the same????? Oh, how would the CS1 center sound with the 40's??? I know the CS2 is bigger but is it really that much better than the CS1? Please elaborate and try to be as unbiased as you can. Speaker preference is very subjective and most people feel the "need" to justify their purchases. What I am after is obtaining some unbiased info with repsect to the Monitor 40's and the CS1/CS2 center channel speakers. Care to help????????