Buy Direct M-F 9am - 10:30pm EST 1-866-764-1801

Vist our Online Store
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1

    Member Sales Rating: (2)

    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    BC, Canada
    Posts
    2,904

    Default Tweaking Voigt Pipes (need advice)

    As some of you may remember a couple months ago I finished up some mini voigt pipes that sit about three and a half feet tall and use a single three inch full range Audax HT080M0 driver. So far I'm enjoying these speakers with their smooth highs, subtle bass presence and sweet midrange. I would like to do any tweaking (or anything major) before I paint them.

    With all the sweet luxuries that come along with a full range speaker I'm still lacking something. These little three inchers lack punch and impact. I have noticed some music sounds amazing on them, while other music just doesn't do it for me. I threw in Michael Bublé's cd and played the song 'Fever' and was just astonished at what these little things could do. Next cd was Dido - No Angel and then then dissapointment set in. It just simply didn't have the midbass that really makes it envolving. The highs were great and they image very very well but overall they just didn't cut it.

    Now to the question ~ Am I just asking too much of a three inch speaker or is there some tweak I can do to try and get them to have more impact and become an involving speaker?


    Okay feel free to skip this part as it's just more background information that might help.

    The enclosures measure out to about 0.2 cubic feet, ported at the bottom and were built to be tuned in the area of around 80 to 90Hz. As I've graphed them in room they roll off ±3dB around 55Hz but have nulls at 180-190Hz and 280-320Hz. Maybe these nulls are hurting more than I had expected. The top half of the speaker is stuffed with a decent amount of polyfill.

    I'll try to graph them again tonight to see what's changed in the last while. Maybe I can push them against the wall some more.

    FWIW they're running off a NAD integrated amp (c352) and a crap toshibia cd player. I've tried them with and without my sub. The sub helps with the overall presence and soundstage but it doesn't add enough of that impact I'm looking for.
    Attached Images  

  2. #2

    Member Sales Rating: (40)

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    North Texas
    Posts
    18,399

    Default

    The only thing you can do with the nulls is try a zobel (if kicking efficiency down a notch is OK). A rear-firing ambient tweeter is always an option for that spatial touch. Add a powered sub (even a cheapie) to get you down to 40Hz, if you don't get presence, you need a different FR driver.

    Full range is cool, what it does, it does well. I've owned a TON of FR designs - but none (even Lowther) can touch a proper 2-way. Sins of omission can be a bitch.

    Cheers,
    Russ
    Check your lips at the door woman. Shake your hips like battleships. Yeah, all the white girls trip when I sing at Sunday service.

  3. #3

    Member Sales Rating: (2)

    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    BC, Canada
    Posts
    2,904

    Default

    Would a zobel network affect the midrange enough or does it just focus on the highs and just slightly change the midrange? I suppose it depends on the impedence curve of the audax driver?

    I've thought of the idea of using a tweeter in the back and have the materials to do it but once these broke in I had a change of mind and don't think they need it. At the moment the highs are not something I'm worried about too much.

    I've got the diy atlas 15 filling in the lows and if it comes down to it and the pipes branch off to their own system I have a cheapo Athena Sub 8 lying around not doing anything. They're decent enough without a sub, but I hate hearing a well known song and noticing low notes that simply aren't there anymore.

    Thanks for the tips Russ. I'll have to try and look into using a zobel network again and see if it'll tickle my fancy. They're not the most efficient speakers at the moment, but it's not like I'm suffering. Even off a t-amp I can push them to decent levels.

  4. #4

    Member Sales Rating: (40)

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    North Texas
    Posts
    18,399

    Default

    Sonic T? There is a small 140 pF cap that is shunted across the outputs. Replace it with a Sonicap (slightly larger value I don't recall offhand), makes a TON of difference in that amp.

    Bottom line, you have a properly tuned enclosure, and the electronics buttoned up - it simply may or may not be the driver for your application.

    Cheers,
    Russ
    Last edited by RuSsMaN; 05-02-2006 at 12:59 AM.
    Check your lips at the door woman. Shake your hips like battleships. Yeah, all the white girls trip when I sing at Sunday service.

  5. #5

    Member Sales Rating: (4)

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    3,458

    Default

    I second everything Russman has to say. 3" driver, not much you can do about that. I'd spend a little more time trying to nail down the sub integration- you're not just going to get the 40-80 hz octave without one. One thing you can try before you finish the pipes- I think it was Brines or the quarterwave.com guy found that TL's that go to a point (ie voight pipes) are not an ideal configuration. Try cutting a block to fit in the top of your pipe so that the minimal depth is like 1"- just get it up there good enough that it doesn't rattle and see what it does for your response. I'll look for that page...
    Gallo Ref 3.1 : Bryston 4b SST : Musical fidelity CD Pre : VPI HW-19
    Gallo Ref AV, Frankengallo Ref 3, LC60i : Bryston 9b SST : Meridian 565
    Jordan JX92s : MF X-T100 : Xray v8
    Backburner:Krell KAV-300i

  6. #6

    Member Sales Rating: (2)

    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    BC, Canada
    Posts
    2,904

    Default

    Alright thanks for all the suggestions. I'll probably just go ahead and paint them sometime in the next little bit. The zobel network can be done afterwards and won't affect the paint ;)

    The tops are actually already squared off. From the inside there is about 2" of flat part (2" deep, 4" wide). Sorry for the terrible pictures. The camera hates taking photos indoors.




    Little off topic but here are some pics of the half assed stands I made at school. I was bored and threw them together in about 20 minutes. Since the it is 19˝" to the center of the drivers I figured it'd be better to have them angled back slightly to aim them at ear level. I lucked out and found the perfect angle. Now I don't have to sit on the floor to listen to them!



    I'll have to look into adding new caps to the sonic impact t-amp if it really does make that much of a difference ;)

    Thanks again for the tips!

  7. #7

    Member Sales Rating: (6)

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    15,426

    Default

    Cool speaks Mike. Single full-range drivers have always drawn my interest.

    Source: C.E.C. CD-3300 CD Transport
    DAC: Benchmark DAC/PRE
    Linestage: Placette Audio Passive
    Power Amp: Parasound HCA-1500A
    Speakers: Harbeth Compact 7ES-3 Monitor

    Stop dissecting and start listening. - Steve in Arizona

  8. #8

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    13

    Default

    im a huge fan of full rangers,mostly because i cant read a schamatic :-)

    i can say im more than happy with my FR's.

    they simply can not do everything. that said,you say your mids are weak. on mine,the mids are the best part,the tweets are a bit weak as is the lowest bass. nature of the beast. i can say,,id build another pair in a second. but they arent for hard,loud rock. least mine arent. but for classical and acoustic music,,they are some of the best ive ever heard. the clarity/accuracy(to me) is just rite.
    blend the sub in and maybe ad the tweet in the rear as mentioned.
    good luck,
    roy

  9. #9

    Member Sales Rating: (2)

    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    6,745

    Default

    They sound awfully small; about half of a typical TQWT (e.g, Abbeys)... are they folded?

    Have you fiddled with the stuffing?

    You might want to try a BSC (baffle step correction) network, but I don't use one with my TQWT's. You might like it, if you're not using fleapower amplification.
    all the best,
    mrh

  10. #10

    Member Sales Rating: (4)

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    3,458

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mhardy6647
    They sound awfully small; about half of a typical TQWT (e.g, Abbeys)... are they folded?
    Abby's use a Fostex driver with a Fs around 50hz- these are more like 80hz (IIRC), so the quarterwave is a bit shorter.
    Gallo Ref 3.1 : Bryston 4b SST : Musical fidelity CD Pre : VPI HW-19
    Gallo Ref AV, Frankengallo Ref 3, LC60i : Bryston 9b SST : Meridian 565
    Jordan JX92s : MF X-T100 : Xray v8
    Backburner:Krell KAV-300i

  11. #11

    Member Sales Rating: (2)

    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    BC, Canada
    Posts
    2,904

    Default

    I can't quite remember where I got the forumula but I used this:
    (1100/fs)/4

    The fs of the driver is 90Hz so it worked out to be 3.056 feet tall so they should be about the right size. If I hadn't used a 3" driver I doubt I'd even have room to put them because they'd be so tall.

    I started off with using the little audax's mostly because I was looking for a cheap way to get into the diy side of audio. The drivers were given to me so all I've had to fork out for this project so far is about $15.

    I'll have to check out the baffle step correction and see if it's what I'm looking for. I also haven't really played with stuffing too much. Now that I look back on these, I belive I was supposed to mount the driver a little higher. I read it should be about a third the way down from the top? It's a little more centered than that, but I guess with mine being so short it's only a matter of about two or three inches.

    The midrange is great but the upper bass lacks some. That's where most of the impact of music comes from and coincidently that's also where the two nulls are in these speakers... I think full range speakers are more suited for those who listen to that certain style of music. Classical, instrumental and maybe soft rock is what they do best. Move to something like Tool and these little things sound pretty crappy (when compared to other speakers).

    So far this has been a great way to learn more about building speakers and a perfect opportunity to explore more options in the realm of audio.

    Thanks,
    Michael

  12. #12

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    13

    Default

    "I also haven't really played with stuffing too much"

    from what i remember reading about those loudspeakers,,you kinda have to putz with the fill untill you get it right.

    good luck,
    ~R~

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Sub purchase advice needed
    By mknutt in forum Subwoofer Hookup & Bass Management
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01-30-2006, 03:02 PM
  2. asking for advice about what to buy
    By TrueG4Life125 in forum Car Audio & Electronics
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 10-04-2005, 08:27 PM
  3. New here, advice needed on M10's
    By shogun in forum Vintage Speakers
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 08-24-2005, 11:46 PM
  4. Need sub advice
    By iluvmusic in forum Speakers
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-25-2004, 05:28 PM
  5. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-18-2004, 07:50 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts