Buy Direct M-F 9am - 10:30pm EST 1-866-764-1801

Vist our Online Store
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    80

    Default monopoles or bipoles

    hey wassup team. i'm thinking of upgrading my four surrounds from monpoles to bipoles. right now i have four 2 way klh bookshelf speakers as my surrouinds. they give out great surround sound but i want something to fill up the back end just a bit more. good idea or bad idea.

  2. #2

    Member Sales Rating: (20)

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Fifth Ring of the Hot Place
    Posts
    7,526

    Default

    Welcome Conqur!:) That is certainly something that you can experiment with just to see which you like best. It's pretty highly subjective. I have VonSchweikert surrounds and I can chose between dipole and mono and to me the mono sounds much better. You can always do a 30 day trial thingie and see if you like the sound of bipoles there.
    Sharp Elite 70
    Anthem D2V 3D
    Parasound 5250
    Parasound HCA 1000 A
    Parasound HCA 1000
    Oppo BDP 95
    Von Schweikert VR4 Jr R/L Fronts
    Von Schweikert LCR 4 Center
    Totem Mask Surrounds X4
    Hsu ULS-15 Quad Drive Subwoofers
    Sony PS3
    Squeezebox Touch

    Polk Atrium 7s on the patio just to keep my foot in the door.

  3. #3

    Member Sales Rating: (1)

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    847

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wingnut4772
    Welcome Conqur!:) That is certainly something that you can experiment with just to see which you like best. It's pretty highly subjective. I have VonSchweikert surrounds and I can chose between dipole and mono and to me the mono sounds much better. You can always do a 30 day trial thingie and see if you like the sound of bipoles there.
    D, can you elaborate on that. Just curious why you say the mono sounds better. I would think the dipoles would have a fuller effect. Are the dipoles more full but not as clear/precise?
    UNIVERA
    Historic Charleston SC

    2 Channel:
    SDA-SRS's RDO tweets
    Biamped Anthem 2 SE's w/1970's NOS Siemens CCA's
    Anthem Pre 2L w/E.harmonix platinum matched 6H23's
    CDP- NAD C 542



    HT setup:
    AVR: NAD T 773
    Rears: Polk LC80i
    DVD: Toshiba 3109 dual tray
    Subs: Velodyne and M&K
    T.V.: Sony KDL-52XBR4 w/Vans Evers Clean Line Jr.
    Conditioner: Panamax M5100EX

    [B]Master Bedroom Sony 40KDL-XBR3

    "I love it when a plan comes together." Hannibal Smith, The A-Team

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Member Sales Rating: (1)

    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    4,500

    Default

    welcome to the forums. Grab 2 sets of Polk F/X's, set the side ones to dipole and the ones in back to bipole.

  5. #5

    Member Sales Rating: (20)

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Fifth Ring of the Hot Place
    Posts
    7,526

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by univera
    D, can you elaborate on that. Just curious why you say the mono sounds better. I would think the dipoles would have a fuller effect. Are the dipoles more full but not as clear/precise?
    In my room , when I select dipole it all sounds like mush to me. Monopole sounds much better and clearer with my system. Because my surrounds are angled like dipoles and against the wall I still get some dispersion- a little. Also music is ten times better.
    Sharp Elite 70
    Anthem D2V 3D
    Parasound 5250
    Parasound HCA 1000 A
    Parasound HCA 1000
    Oppo BDP 95
    Von Schweikert VR4 Jr R/L Fronts
    Von Schweikert LCR 4 Center
    Totem Mask Surrounds X4
    Hsu ULS-15 Quad Drive Subwoofers
    Sony PS3
    Squeezebox Touch

    Polk Atrium 7s on the patio just to keep my foot in the door.

  6. #6

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    80

    Default

    i'm glad to be apart of this forum, but i feel uninformed and left behind with all these polk fans around here. my only polk product is my sub.

  7. #7

    Member Sales Rating: (21)

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Deep Down the Rabbit Hole
    Posts
    9,595

    Default

    You should change your lack of polkness immediately!!!!!!!!!! The audio Gods will smile upon you.

    I have tossed this bi-pole/di-pole thing a bit and settled on di-pole for the sides and bi-pole for the backs. Seems to me when there is a Back Surround track on the disc most of it is transient sounds, overhead gunshots, copters and the like. Well actually I dont use switchable back speaks, but if I did I would set them to bi-pole.

    RT1
    REEL TIME THEATRE
    Onkyo-TX-NR5007
    B&K 7270 amplifier
    Polk SWA-500 Subwoofer amplifier
    OppO BDP-83
    Pioneer Elite 50"
    Polk LCi-RTS-105;LCi-RTS-C;LCi-RTSFx;LCi80Fx
    Subs-Twin Polk CSW200
    HTS5000


    RABBIT HOLE RIG
    BAT VK-31SE
    VTL MB-450 Signature monoblock
    Wolcott Presence monoblock
    Musical Fidelity kW SACD
    Rega P25/RB600/Clearaudio Aurum Beta
    Acoustech Phono-Pre
    Sound Lab Millenium ELS
    BillyBags Rack
    MIT S1/3 cables
    Shunyata/PS Audio/Virtual Dynamics Power Cords


    Everthing Matters...Tubes Rule...and It's Over until it's Not Over

  8. #8

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    80

    Default

    yes i know i need to invest more in polk the sub i have is awesome. i love it..nice tight, full bass. i was thinking of upgrading my entire speaker system to polkaudio. but what is up with the svs subs. i keep reading about them on this forum.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts