Free Shipping on All Orders 1-866-764-1801

Vist our Online Store
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    649

    Default mmc6500 active or passive?

    So right now my mmc6500 are receiving just under 100 watts from a c400.4. I'm getting a good deal on another c400.4. The only reason I'm considering it is because these things are craving a little more power. I want to bi-amp them so I can hopefully get a little more mid-bass (even though they sound great the way they are).

    I'm wondering if its a better idea to bi-amp them using the x-overs they came with (~95 watts to each driver and tweeter) or to use the built-in active x-over in the c400.4. The only reason I'm not liking the active x-over thing is because I cant choose the frequencies i want them to play... or at least it doesn't seem that way. I'll prolly end up testing both scenarios but thought I'd get some opinions.

  2. #2

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Chattanooga, TN
    Posts
    11,827

    Default

    Sure you can.

    You dont have to use the Pre-EQ.

    The 400.4 has a variable crossover on it from 50-5000 Hz for each channel.
    polkaudio sound quality competitor since 2005
    MECA SQ Rookie of the Year 06 ~ MECA State Champ 06,07,08,11 ~ MECA World Finals 2nd place 06,07,08,09
    08 Car Audio Nationals 1st ~ 07 N Georgia Nationals 1st ~ 06 Carl Casper Nationals 1st ~ USACi 05 Southeast AutumnFest 1st

    polkaudio SR6500 --- polkaudio MM1040 x2 -- Pioneer P99 -- Rockford Fosgate P1000X5D

  3. #3

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    D.C. Metro
    Posts
    355

    Default

    i had the same issue...seems like the crossover on that amp isn't very accurate. mine would play frequencies that i thought i had cut out entirely. i would just get an external crossover from someone else. probably would work a bit better.
    At Home:
    Panasonic 42'' TC-L42U12 LCD
    Pioneer VSX-80TXV
    Toshiba HD-XA2
    Sony PS3 - psn "metalguitars"
    Xbox 360 - gamertag "giggidygiggidy"
    Panamax 4300EX
    Polk RTi8's
    Polk CSi3's
    Polk FXi3's. (x2)
    Martin Logan Dynamo (x2)
    Audioquest interconnects and wires.

    Away From Home:
    JVC HDR-50
    stock system in new car for now:(

  4. #4

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    649

    Default

    ok cool. I think I'll bi-amp them using the c400.4 without using the pre-eq.

    or would it be better to bi-amp it using the c300.2 for the woofer and 2 channels from the c400.4 for the tweeters?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Running an mmc6500 active
    By csnut18 in forum Car Audio & Electronics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-22-2007, 07:35 PM
  2. Turning an Active Sub into a Passive One
    By Early B. in forum DIY, Mods & Tweaks
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-27-2006, 07:27 PM
  3. Nice passive/active preamp...
    By steveinaz in forum Flea Market
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-17-2004, 05:24 PM
  4. RTi70 active or passive 2'nd driver
    By gmorris in forum Speakers
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 05-04-2004, 04:54 PM
  5. Crossover's active or passive
    By Dwain in forum Speakers
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-24-2003, 04:43 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts