Buy Direct M-F 9am - 10:30pm EST 1-866-764-1801

Vist our Online Store
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 46
  1. #1

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Castro Valley/San Francisco, California
    Posts
    4,892

    Default Yamaha's new 2 channel components


  2. #2

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    42

    Default

    That makes my sticker peck out.

  3. #3

    Member Sales Rating: (27)

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    2,346

    Default

    Does anyone know what a XL output is? "XL and optical/coaxial digital outputs"

  4. #4

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    42

    Default

    It a spreadsheet program. You can get a printout of the day's usage, frequency response, tracks on the discs played, etc.

  5. #5

    Member Sales Rating: (19)

    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Northern IL/Central IA
    Posts
    5,471

    Default

    I love the cosmetics, of course I always liked the older Yamaha styling!
    DKG999
    -----------------------------------------
    HT System: LSi9, LSiCx2, LSiFX, LSi7, SVS 20-39 PC+, B&K 507.s2 AVR, B&K Ref 125.2, Tripplite LCR-2400, Cambridge 650BD, Signal Cable PC/SC, BJC IC, Samsung 55" LED

    Music System: Magnepan 1.6QR, SVS SB12+, ARC pre, Parasound HCA1500 vertically bi-amped, Jolida CDP, Pro-Ject RM5.1SE TT, Pro-Ject TubeBox SE phono pre, SBT, PS Audio DLIII DAC

  6. #6

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Sweet Spot
    Posts
    771

    Default

    Daaaaamn... and I just invested another 300 dollars in my current system... but why do they have to cost so much?!?

    If you are going to bring back the retro look, give me the retro prices man. Even adjusting for inflation, I somehow feel like money went farther in the late 70's and 80's with audio... but maybe it was all an illusion.

  7. #7

    Member Sales Rating: (6)

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    15,427

    Default

    History always repeats itself, cool.

    Source: C.E.C. CD-3300 CD Transport
    DAC: Benchmark DAC/PRE
    Linestage: Placette Audio Passive
    Power Amp: Parasound HCA-1500A
    Speakers: Harbeth Compact 7ES-3 Monitor

    Stop dissecting and start listening. - Steve in Arizona

  8. #8

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Castro Valley/San Francisco, California
    Posts
    4,892

    Default

    The retro looking Onkyo 2 channel stereo components have relatively affordable prices....around $500.00 a piece.

  9. #9

    Member Sales Rating: (11)

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Spokane, Washington
    Posts
    15,830

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gaara View Post
    Does anyone know what a XL output is? "XL and optical/coaxial digital outputs"
    I would think it would be an XLR three pin type of output connector.. for balanced connectors, unlike a RCA audio unbalanced audio connection

  10. #10

    Member Sales Rating: (16)

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Andromeda
    Posts
    13,782

    Thumbs up

    Yamaha rocks.

  11. #11

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    151

    Default

    I've always liked Yamaha stuff. Their home audio gear is good, and I also like their musical instruments. These pieces are beautiful. Is that real wood on the sides? They should have made it overhang the sides on the front. It would look even nicer.

  12. #12

    Member Sales Rating: (27)

    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    20,605

    Default

    I like Yamaha pretty well --

    But man thats an expensive piece of Yamaha gear... just saying... lol
    www.Vr3Mods.com

    "No, that's silly talk. Dude, you can't possibly be this audio dumb so quit the act." - Doro

  13. #13

    Member Sales Rating: (11)

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Okc, Ok
    Posts
    877

    Default

    They look like something you would pick up off of craigslist for twenty five bucks or so.


    Dave
    Once again we meet at last.

  14. #14

    Member Sales Rating: (2)

    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    6,746

    Default

    impressively retro-Yamaha :-)

    all the best,
    mrh

  15. #15

    Member Sales Rating: (1)

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Caribbean
    Posts
    417

    Default

    hmmm i might do some investigating into those like pretty nice
    Chicomorales:)

  16. #16

    Member Sales Rating: (11)

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Spokane, Washington
    Posts
    15,830

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mhardy6647 View Post
    impressively retro-Yamaha :-)

    HEY YOU!!! give me back my Yamaha amp.. ;) i have one just like it for my computer rig. i love that thing with those analog meters bouncing back and forth.

    For some reason the Yamaha CA-610II is just one sexy bitch of an int amp. I looked at the other Yammies a few steps up the ladder and down a rung or two, and I kept coming back to this one for looks. beefy little 45wpc bugger :)

  17. #17

    Member Sales Rating: (1)

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Caribbean
    Posts
    417

    Default

    wait a minute how much are these things going to cost?
    Chicomorales:)

  18. #18

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Sweet Spot
    Posts
    771

    Default

    1600 and 1900 bucks, respectively. As in... retro looks, without the retro prices.

    I would rather have a real vintage yamaha, unless those prices come down. I almost bought one of the late 70's vintage natural sound receivers... I think I was looking at one with a switch that would put it into pure class A mode.

  19. #19

    Member Sales Rating: (2)

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    702

    Default

    They look nice, but I sure would hope they work better than the one Yammerhammer integrated I had. That one turned me off on that company forever.
    Lots of Carver stuff and a pair of LSi9's

  20. #20

    Member Sales Rating: (27)

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    2,346

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hale2thechief View Post
    It a spreadsheet program. You can get a printout of the day's usage, frequency response, tracks on the discs played, etc.
    You mean short for Excel? If not than I have never heard of it but it would be a interesting feature to have...doesn't make sense with a retro looking component like this though.

    Quote Originally Posted by danger boy View Post
    I would think it would be an XLR three pin type of output connector.. for balanced connectors, unlike a RCA audio unbalanced audio connection
    I thought they missed the R to but I thought that AES/EBU was the digital out that used XLR. If I recall correctly for digital outputs there is Toslink, Coaxial, AES/EBU, and that other one that uses a locking optical cable.

  21. #21

    Member Sales Rating: (2)

    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    6,746

    Default

    The CA-610II was $270 new ca. 1978 (I have the receipt for mine, purchased new when I was in college). In today's dollars, allowing only for CPI inflation, that would be $863.38

    http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/cpicalc.pl

    FWIW, I'd rather have a CA-1010 or 2010, but I couldn't afford one then and I cannot justify one now :-)
    all the best,
    mrh

  22. #22

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    885

    Default

    The integrated weights just under 50lbs, the SACD player just under 40lbs; both are fully balanced designs. I don't see how their overpriced in comparison to what else is out there with the same build quality and design.

  23. #23

    Member Sales Rating: (6)

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    4,280

    Default

    The CA-610II was $270 new ca. 1978 (I have the receipt for mine, purchased new when I was in college). In today's dollars, allowing only for CPI inflation, that would be $863.38
    The CA-610II puts out 40 watts @ 8ohms and 50 @ 4ohms, and wieghs only 18 lbs. The new one puts out 120 watts @ 8ohms and 190 @ 4ohms, and wieghs almost 50 lbs.

    Really not comparable units at all.

  24. #24

    Member Sales Rating: (2)

    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    6,746

    Default

    I think you missed the point. If the CA-610II would be $863 today, the price tag of the new 2-channel amp isn't out of line at all.
    all the best,
    mrh

  25. #25

    Member Sales Rating: (11)

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Spokane, Washington
    Posts
    15,830

    Default

    that new Yamaha int amp needs analog meters though if they really wanted to pay homage to the 70's retro look. the left half of the face is missing something. meters

  26. #26

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Winter Park, FL
    Posts
    40

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by danger boy View Post
    that new Yamaha int amp needs analog meters though if they really wanted to pay homage to the 70's retro look. the left half of the face is missing something. meters
    It really is. It looks kinda empty.
    As for me, I'll stick with my Yamaha M-85. It's all about the big, class A beast that could probably heat my house in the winter.

  27. #27

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    96

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by danger boy View Post
    that new Yamaha int amp needs analog meters though if they really wanted to pay homage to the 70's retro look. the left half of the face is missing something. meters
    The original CA1000 had no meters, and was built to nearly that build level in about 1973, to the extent available at that time. I imagine the price isn't too far out of the inflationary realm for a modern retake. One thing I'll guarantee you, Yamaha isn't "packing" the price. The price is directly related to the cost of building it. No padding.

    Mark
    System:

    VPI Scout/Benz Ace
    Sutherland PH2000
    Arcam CD72
    Yamaha DVD-CX1 (primarily for CD..26 lbs, all BB D/A)
    Audioprism Mantissa w/Reference PS
    Parasound HCA750 (temporary)
    Audiovector M1 Signatures
    Kimber 4TC x 2

  28. #28

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Sweet Spot
    Posts
    771

    Default

    How do you know that?

    What mega corporation does not pad prices for a niche group? Most of them do this... they have the manufacturing and distribution capacity that most of the smaller companies would only dream of, but the smaller companies can beat these giants on a price/performance ratio almost always.
    Last edited by Yashu; 11-18-2007 at 07:51 PM.

  29. #29

    Member Sales Rating: (20)

    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    California Bay Area
    Posts
    5,572

    Default

    I have always liked yamaha..

    I`m glad they are trying new things....


    I wonder how they sound ?

    I also where one would go to demo these units...
    Cary SLP-98L F1 DC Pre Amp (Jag Blue)
    Parasound HCA-3500
    Cary Audio V12 amp (Jag Red)
    Polk Audio Xm Reciever (Autographed by THE MAN Himself)
    Magnum Dynalab MD-102 Analog Tuna
    Jolida JD-100 CDP
    Polk Audio LSi9 Speaks (ebony)
    SVS PC-Ultra Sub
    AQ Bedrock Speaker Cables (Bi-Wired)
    MIT Shotgun S1 I/C`s
    AQ Black Thunder Sub Cables
    PS Audio Plus Power Cords
    Magnum Dynalab ST-2 FM Antenna
    Sanus Cherry wood Speak Stands
    Adona AV45CS3 / 3 Tier Rack (Black /Gold)



  30. #30

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Sweet Spot
    Posts
    771

    Default

    Yeah that would be cool... if they had them in more stores for us to test.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Components or Not?
    By Airplay355 in forum Car Audio & Electronics
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 04-06-2006, 06:17 PM
  2. 4 components ok
    By jablonep in forum Car Subwoofer Talk
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-15-2004, 02:29 PM
  3. Yamaha's new RX-Z9
    By Grimster74 in forum Basic Hookup/Wiring Questions
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 08-28-2003, 01:48 AM
  4. B&K Components, LTD.
    By Tour2ma in forum Electronics
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 01-15-2003, 07:27 PM
  5. Components
    By C-Man in forum Car Audio & Electronics
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 03-28-2002, 02:30 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts