Buy Direct M-F 9am - 10:30pm EST 1-866-764-1801

Vist our Online Store
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    A Salty Piece of Land
    Posts
    46

    Default 5JR+ Tweeter verification

    I believe I'm right but just double checking

    My original pair of 5JR+(the difference between the 5JR and the 5JR+ model is that the original JRs did not have a bass radiator)

    My question is about the tweeters
    I believe this should be an SL2000


    and


    It appears to be a damaged SL2000, correct?

    Wonder if it affects SQ at all?
    also Wonder if I might be able to pull it back out with a vacuum cleaner or maybe a turkey baster


    I also acquired a used pair over the weekend($30) and upon closer inspection, one of the black coverings(wire) to the tweeter is coming up. Speaker works fine, just wondering if I can take a dab of glue(crazy ok?) and tack this back down

    for future reference
    peerless=SL1000 (wires on side point at an angle)
    SL2000=Wires are straight across(clear dome)
    SL2500=Wires are straight across(black dome)

    Thanks
    \\//\\//
    Some of the worst wrongs get righted on three cords

  2. #2

    Member Sales Rating: (4)

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    LSU, Louisiana "In a galaxy far far away"
    Posts
    4,100

    Default

    Peerless were HL1000, black face plate with hole in middle of black dome.

    The Polk SL1000, have a silver face plate. With PolkAudio scribed on theme.

    Sonicly completely different tweets.

    Yes yours are damaged. The curvature of the dome, in its original form, produces a responce that is accurate to the maker. Different than a pushed in cone on a woofer, a tweeter with a pushed in cone, wil effect the sound.
    Last edited by jakelm; 01-21-2008 at 05:40 PM.
    Monitor 7b's front
    Monitor 4's surround
    Frankinpolk Center (2 mw6503's with peerless tweeter)
    M10's back surround
    Hafler-200 driving patio Daytons
    Tempest-X 15" DIY sub w/ Rythmik 350A plate amp
    Dayton 12" DVC w/ Rythmik 350a plate amp
    Harman/Kardon AVR-635
    Oppo 981hd
    Denon upconvert DVD player
    Jennings Research (vintage and rare)
    Mit RPTV WS-55513
    Tosh HD-XA1
    B&K AV5000


    Dont BAN me Bro!!!!

  3. #3

    Member Sales Rating: (4)

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    LSU, Louisiana "In a galaxy far far away"
    Posts
    4,100

    Default

    You could unscrew the 4 screws, releasing the plate from the magnet, and push the tweet out. I find this better than using a mechanical devise.
    Monitor 7b's front
    Monitor 4's surround
    Frankinpolk Center (2 mw6503's with peerless tweeter)
    M10's back surround
    Hafler-200 driving patio Daytons
    Tempest-X 15" DIY sub w/ Rythmik 350A plate amp
    Dayton 12" DVC w/ Rythmik 350a plate amp
    Harman/Kardon AVR-635
    Oppo 981hd
    Denon upconvert DVD player
    Jennings Research (vintage and rare)
    Mit RPTV WS-55513
    Tosh HD-XA1
    B&K AV5000


    Dont BAN me Bro!!!!

  4. #4

    Member Sales Rating: (2)

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    So. Cal.
    Posts
    218

    Default

    Click this thread for possible ways to suck out the dome:

    http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?t=62319

  5. #5

    Member Sales Rating: (1)

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,180

    Default

    Looks like a metal dome, which is making me cringe.

    I've repaired the same type of 'pushed in' tweeter, but the dome was rubberized. The reason it has that shape is because there is another dome behind the one seen. Therefore, taking it apart will likely be a waste of time.

    Best of luck, I personally feel it cannot be restored with parts on hand.

  6. #6

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    A Salty Piece of Land
    Posts
    46

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Boywonder View Post
    Click this thread for possible ways to suck out the dome:

    http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?t=62319
    Thanks
    Lips to the dome method(man, there are JUST SOOOO many ways this sounds wrong) worked fairly well

    now, about gluing down the black coating(wire?) om the newer pair I got
    (yes I'm going to re-do both of these one day) But my accountants( Dewey, Cheatum and Howe) said no more funds for Mancave things for a while
    Some of the worst wrongs get righted on three cords

  7. #7

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    A Salty Piece of Land
    Posts
    46

    Default

    duplicate
    Some of the worst wrongs get righted on three cords

  8. #8

    Member Sales Rating: (16)

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    In A Van Down By The River
    Posts
    20,714

    Default

    It's an sl2000 tweeter the dome material is not metal or silk it's a semi-rigid and flexible polymer type material. I suspect if you pull the dome off using the 4 screws that fluid will leak out since the voice coil is liquid cooled.

    Used sl2000 tweeters are FS here all the time for a very reasonable price or the alternative is to purchase a pair of RD0194-1 silk dome replacement tweeters from Polk. Those are drop in and are much better sounding (IMO) than the original sl2000's

    Tell them you are Polk member and the cost is ~$102/PR shipped 2 day Fed Ex to your door.

    There is no other Polk tweeter new or used that will work properly and give you the sound the speaker was designed for.

    Good luck

    H9
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass

    Pass Aleph 30; Adcom GFP750/Dared SL2000A; Adcom GDA600; MIT S3/Z Pc; SDA 1C; Squeezebox; Tubes add soul!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Tweteer Verification
    By jbustamante1 in forum Troubleshooting
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-21-2006, 12:00 PM
  2. RM202 verification
    By HomeThtr in forum Speakers
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 10-21-2005, 09:06 PM
  3. Tweeter bi-amp....
    By denis87 in forum Car Audio & Electronics
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 04-10-2005, 04:03 AM
  4. tweeter
    By sntnsupermen131 in forum Car Audio & Electronics
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-25-2003, 01:26 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts