Buy Direct M-F 9am - 10:30pm EST 1-866-764-1801

Vist our Online Store
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1

    Member Sales Rating: (41)

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Milwaukee, WI
    Posts
    8,580

    Default vintage speakers

    How does the vintage SDA's, and monitors compare to the new polk speakers
    RTI, LSI, monitors, etc.

    Thanks

  2. #2

    Member Sales Rating: (16)

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Six 'Burgh (Pittsburgh), PA
    Posts
    6,455

    Default

    I like the sound of the vintage SDA's and Monitors. I also like the older RTA and RTi line of speakers. The LSi series of Polk speakers are excellent. The newer R and Monitor series are fine and offer good quality. The LSi's like the SDA's need a lot of good clean power to live up to their potential as they are 4 ohm speakers. The LSi monitor size speakers are great for both HT and 2 channel music.
    Carl

  3. #3

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    739

    Default

    The older Polks are more open than the newer ones which seems a bit laid back. The newer Polks treble is smoother on top, the bass goes lower and is tighter since the most of the older speakers use passive radiators rather than actively driven woofers.

    The nice thing about the older Polks is that you can easily upgrade the crossovers to really improve the sound. Instead of spending several hundred dollars on a new pair, you can spend a few hundred buying a 20-year old speaker and upgrade the crossovers. The really nice thing about Polks is that the drivers usually have butyl rubber surrounds so you do not have to worry about foam rot.

    After doing a crossover upgrade using Sonicaps and replacing any older polymide (plastic) tweeters with cloth domes, the older speakers have a lot better soundstage with a more open, focused image with greater depth than the new Polks. However, the older Polks do seem to be a tad "colored" compared to the newer models.

  4. #4

    Member Sales Rating: (13)

    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    The Mars Hotel
    Posts
    27,662

    Default

    the bass goes lower and is tighter since the most of the older speakers use passive radiators rather than actively driven woofers.
    Huh? The bass in the SDA's goes deeper and is tighter because they use passive radiators rather than the ports in the newer models.
    'Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."

  5. #5

    Member Sales Rating: (31)

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Long Island
    Posts
    14,195

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by F1nut View Post
    Huh? The bass in the SDA's goes deeper and is tighter because they use passive radiators rather than the ports in the newer models.
    The older models do have better bass, there's more of it and it's more controlled. But, I wouldn't blame the newer model's lack of good bass on the ported enclosure.

  6. #6

    Member Sales Rating: (47)

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sufficiently Breathless
    Posts
    10,615

    Default

    I'll take the SDA bass anyday, it was easier for me to control/setup than the LSI series,YMMV,, setup and driven properly,,both are very good speakers.
    JC approves....he told me so. (F-1 nut)

  7. #7

    Member Sales Rating: (8)

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Towson, Maryland
    Posts
    2,548

    Default

    The Stereo Reviews that were posted not to long ago on various SDA models said the bass from the SDA's was one of the lowest (if not the lowest) distortion they had ever recorded.
    I like speakers that are bigger than a small refrigerator but smaller than a big refrigerator:D

  8. #8

    Member Sales Rating: (17)

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Roselle Park, NJ
    Posts
    10,846

    Default

    I've only heard the LSi15's on a very powerful high current amp and they sounded like crap comparred to my 1.2TL's and even my SRS 2's

    Sorry Matt :(
    Polk Audio SDA SRS 1.2TL's
    With new Exotic wood, Sonicaps, Mills & RDO198's - Born on 4-24-1989 and Signed by Matthew Polk!!!!


    My Polk SDA SRS 1.2TL's http://www.LASAREATH.com/


    It All Started here: http://tinyurl.com/lasareath2

    Part Deux: http://tinyurl.com/lasareath3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. new CC with vintage speakers for HT?
    By tx_polkhead in forum Vintage Speakers
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-01-2008, 05:48 PM
  2. Some vintage/semi-vintage gear+speakers, cheap
    By John in MA in forum For Sale (FS) Classifieds
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 01-19-2008, 01:12 PM
  3. Vintage Polk speakers for home theater Vs. vintage JBL?
    By jpchleapas in forum Vintage Speakers
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-23-2006, 12:03 PM
  4. Now these are Vintage speakers...
    By Tour2ma in forum Vintage Speakers
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-04-2004, 03:57 AM
  5. Where are all the 'vintage' speakers???
    By AsSiMiLaTeD in forum Speakers
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-21-2004, 11:33 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts