Yes yes my friends, I am sure you have answered this more times than you would have liked to, but I didnt see it in any threads i could find. So my form of the question goes like this:
I won an ebay auction for a lot of monster cable, I have now in my possession:
4 PAIRS interlink 250
2 single monstervideo 2
2 single monstervideo 3
upon inspection, the video cables seem much better quality than the 250's. I base this on several facts:
1. upon unscrewing the end cap, the cable looks a little larger in gauge for the video
2. the video cables both use the slanted turbine connecter, as does the Interlink 400 mark 2, which is 2 levels higher than the 250.
3. the retail for one PAIR of 250's is 25. The retail for a Single MV2 is 20, and a single MV3 is 30 (all 1m length). Yes price doesnt equal performance, but within a single company I would say the correlation should be pretty linear.
So of course the question is, I dont have any video sources i need composite for, should I use the video cables for audio?
Obviously the answer is to listen and see if I can tell the difference, but i dont have my new equipment with me yet so Im just kind of preparing (its at my house, im at school)
Lastly, one interesting thing I noticed is that the 250's have a clearly marked directional signal path on the jacket, whereas the video cables do not. What do you think that is about?
Thanks for going through the answer again, im sure this isnt the first time