Buy Direct M-F 9am - 10:30pm EST 1-866-764-1801

Vist our Online Store
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 35
  1. #1

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    127

    Default ADCOM GFA 555 vs 555 ii which is more desirable..in your prof. opinions?

    GFA 555 vs 555 mk.ii which is more desirable? to match with my monitor 10s upgraded XO's RDO198s to follow.

    Im leaning on adcom cuz im a basshead....thats right I said it.
    But no seriously i love my monitor 10's and am excited...pleez help with your much valued experience....

    Throw in your preffered pre-amp with this combo as well...tube even if this is a wise entry level opportunity to introduce myself to it.

    Thanks again to all.

    This is my first tru blue hi-fi system and I just want to make some wise choices avoiding financial pitfalls.
    So I need all the help I can get.
    Last edited by RandyWilliamson; 05-20-2009 at 07:44 PM.

  2. #2

    Member Sales Rating: (1)

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Descending toward the moon in the CLEM (Chinese Lunar Excursion Module), looking for Chang'e
    Posts
    10,089

    Default

    Although OLDER and perhaps needing new caps, etc. The original Adcom GFA-555 is the best in that series.

    Either unit has more than enough power for those 10s.

    cnh

  3. #3

    Member Sales Rating: (11)

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Dixon, IL
    Posts
    6,510

    Default

    http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/show...ight=adcom+555

    Check out this thread, it describes all of the differences between them.

    The consensus seems to be that the original 555 is better.
    The nirvana inducer-
    APC H10 Power Conditioner
    Denon DVD-2910 universal player
    DPA The Little Bit Three DAC
    Yamaha P-300 turntable/TCC TC-750 phono preamp
    Acurus L10 preamp
    Adcom GFA-545 power amp
    PolkAudio SDA 2A's/PolkAudio Monitor 7A's
    Audioquest Type 4 speaker cables
    Audioquest Sidewinder IC's
    Audioquest Black Mamba IC's
    Signal Cable Analog II IC's

  4. #4

    Member Sales Rating: (1)

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Descending toward the moon in the CLEM (Chinese Lunar Excursion Module), looking for Chang'e
    Posts
    10,089

    Default

    Randy,

    Here's heiney9s discussion of what's a good Adcom pre-amp! I hope he doesn't mind but this is GREAT INFO!

    The best pre amp Adcom made was the GFP-750. It was a Nelson Pass design based very closely on his $4000 Aleph P, which is considered among the best sounding SS pre-amps. The 750 is a dead neutral preamp in both passive and active mode. If you don't like dead neutral sounding components I'd steer clear of it.

    I have one I'm borrowing from my brother...........it's dead neutral and when paired with my warm, open Aleph 30 amp it certainly sounds much different then what I'm used too. For me the jury is still out as to whether or not it has the correct synergy I'm looking for. That said, it's a fantastic sounding pre-amp.

    The GFP-750 retailed for between $1250-1500 depending on when it was purchased. Typically mint units sell in the $800-950 range used with lesser units (many missing the remote) selling for $650-800. I believe you can still get the remote from Adcom, but if you find a unit w/o it I'd call Adcom to make sure.

    The GFP-710 and GFP-715 are also among their better designs. Anything with a tuner in it is not the greatest and leaves a lot to be desired. The GFP-555 is also one people commonly see.......not the greatest unit either.

    This would be my only recommendation for Adcom pre-amps

    GFP-750
    GFP-715
    GFP-710.......in that order. Anything else short of free; I'd look else where.

    Hope this helps

    Linky to a review from Stereophile http://www.stereophile.com/solidpreamps/133/

    H9

    P.s. we were using the GFP-750 to run Ted's currently acquired (by my brother) BAT VK-120's since the Adcom is a true balanced pre and they sounded absolutely fantastic, dynamic, balanced, very open and detailed, not a hint of harshness. If it's good enough for those; it's good enough for anything

  5. #5

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    127

    Default

    Comftorble Curt I saw that one but it wasnt very clear...and to be honest I was think the ii's might be more probable to have good caps functioning...vs...the older......altho I may not be too far from being able to replace the caps..but would rather not.

    So I just want to hear for sure if the original is truly more desirable becuz that thread and the review posted there by H9 in my eyes shows a fair to good/healthy upgrade but you guys know better than me...i guess it would boil down to opinions so lets hear them.

    thnks CNH and thanks for the order it gives me the opportunity to build around my budget...much appreciated.
    Last edited by RandyWilliamson; 05-20-2009 at 07:58 PM.

  6. #6

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    127

    Default

    anymore opinions out there?

  7. #7

    Member Sales Rating: (19)

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    7,214

    Default

    I have heard that the 555II fixed somethings that were no done right on the 555 and that's about it.
    engtaz

    I love how music can brighten up a bad day.

  8. #8

    Member Sales Rating: (31)

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Long Island
    Posts
    14,186

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by engtaz View Post
    i have heard that the 555ii fixed somethings that were no done right on the 555 and that's about it.
    what?
    "He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And when you gaze long into an abyss the abyss also gazes into you." Friedrich Nietzsche

  9. #9

    Member Sales Rating: (4)

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    6,969

    Default

    555, I believe it has more power.
    polkaudio RT35 Bookshelves
    polkaudio 255c-RT Inwalls
    polkaudio DSWPro550WI
    polkaudio XRT12 XM Tuner
    polkaudio RM6750 5.1

    Front projection, 2 channel, car audio... life is good!

  10. #10

    Member Sales Rating: (11)

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Dixon, IL
    Posts
    6,510

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by engtaz View Post
    I have heard that the 555II fixed somethings that were no done right on the 555 and that's about it.
    I've always heard the opposite.

    The original 555 was a Nelson Pass design, and was very simple in it's design. That's part of what gave it the sound that it has. Nelson Pass wasn't involved with the re-engineering of the 555II though, and from what I've gathered, the Adcom engineers took it and tried to improve on it, but in doing so, they made it's design more complex, but not necessarily better.

    This detracted from the SQ from what I've heard. Out of all the reviews I've read, the consensus seems to be that most people prefer the original version.
    The nirvana inducer-
    APC H10 Power Conditioner
    Denon DVD-2910 universal player
    DPA The Little Bit Three DAC
    Yamaha P-300 turntable/TCC TC-750 phono preamp
    Acurus L10 preamp
    Adcom GFA-545 power amp
    PolkAudio SDA 2A's/PolkAudio Monitor 7A's
    Audioquest Type 4 speaker cables
    Audioquest Sidewinder IC's
    Audioquest Black Mamba IC's
    Signal Cable Analog II IC's

  11. #11

    Member Sales Rating: (43)

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    15,924

    Default

    I llike emu
    Please. Please contact me a ben62670 @ yahoo.com. Make sure to include who you are, and you are from Polk so I don't delete your email. Also I am now physically unable to work on any projects. If you need help let these guys know. There are many people who will help if you let them know where you are.
    Thanks
    Ben

  12. #12

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    127

    Default

    Ben what is Emu?

  13. #13

    Member Sales Rating: (19)

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    7,214

    Default

    I believe what I wrote was paraphrasing a comment buy Nelson Pass. I did not say which was better.
    engtaz

    I love how music can brighten up a bad day.

  14. #14

    Member Sales Rating: (47)

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sufficiently Breathless
    Posts
    10,602

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RandyWilliamson View Post
    Ben what is Emu?
    Emu is the name for a modded 555 adcom,,jk,,, get the 555 and make sure the caps are not leaking/ get Ben or someone ,yourself if you can weild a soldering iron,,and do the cap mod,, use the search function, as someone here just recently did it,,pretty simple..Good luck.
    JC approves....he told me so. (F-1 nut)

  15. #15

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    127

    Default

    You speak of thiiissss:

    http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/show...ight=adcom+555

    565 mod applies to 555?....I can do it but I'd have to get around to it I guess..im just a lazy bastard sometimes...plus rigging my home theater and this is some work as is.

  16. #16

    Member Sales Rating: (16)

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    In A Van Down By The River
    Posts
    20,707

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RandyWilliamson View Post
    Comftorble Curt I saw that one but it wasnt very clear...and to be honest I was think the ii's might be more probable to have good caps functioning...vs...the older......altho I may not be too far from being able to replace the caps..but would rather not.

    So I just want to hear for sure if the original is truly more desirable becuz that thread and the review posted there by H9 in my eyes shows a fair to good/healthy upgrade but you guys know better than me...i guess it would boil down to opinions so lets hear them.

    thnks CNH and thanks for the order it gives me the opportunity to build around my budget...much appreciated.
    Well there is really only a few years difference between the two models so caps and longevity will be about the same.

    I like the older versions for a couple reasons

    1) I like direct coupled amps......caps influence sound
    2) The orignal is much simpler and closer to Nelson Pass's original design. The MKII is unecessarily complicated.
    3) Not a huge fan of the Darlington output stage (again think simplicity).

    Either would be fine but I'd replace the coupling caps right away if you get the MKII. That's where the weakness is in any amp that is capacitor coupled of that age.

    Hope this helps

    H9
    Last edited by heiney9; 05-22-2009 at 01:55 PM.
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass

    Pass Aleph 30; Adcom GFP750/Dared SL2000A; Adcom GDA600; MIT S3/Z Pc; SDA 1C; Squeezebox; Tubes add soul!

  17. #17

    Member Sales Rating: (16)

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    In A Van Down By The River
    Posts
    20,707

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by engtaz View Post
    I believe what I wrote was paraphrasing a comment buy Nelson Pass. I did not say which was better.
    Here is the exact quote: from 2002

    I designed the 555. I believe the Mk II added a couple
    of what were considered improvements, and it seemed
    to me that it included triple darlington outputs instead
    of 2 follower. I might have the schematic around, but
    all told it was a simple bipolar design with a current
    sourced input diff pair followed by a common-emitter
    gain device that was also current sourced. This drove
    the followers.

    It was typical of all the 5XXX amps that I did the first one
    and then they improved it until it had too many parts,
    and then I would design the next in the series

    Americo Borza sent me an old 555 in the hopes that I
    would update it, and it still sits here, a perfect candidate
    since so many of them were built.

    Personally, I would score a few of these and run them till
    they die and then update them. If you wait long enough,
    an update will be issued.


    H9

    P.s. I love the 2nd line in paragraph 2 :D. Also the highlighted part is sort of tongue in cheek (meaning it probably didn't improve anything)
    Last edited by heiney9; 05-22-2009 at 02:12 PM.
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass

    Pass Aleph 30; Adcom GFP750/Dared SL2000A; Adcom GDA600; MIT S3/Z Pc; SDA 1C; Squeezebox; Tubes add soul!

  18. #18
    GV#27
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by heiney9 View Post

    Either would be fine but I'd replace the coupling caps right away if you get the MKII. That's where the weakness is in any amp that is capacitor coupled of that age.

    Hope this helps

    H9
    The MK2 is direct coupled.I believe they are using a servo instead of a coupling cap.

  19. #19

    Member Sales Rating: (16)

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    In A Van Down By The River
    Posts
    20,707

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GV#27 View Post
    The MK2 is direct coupled.I believe they are using a servo instead of a coupling cap.
    I think you're correct. I'm confusing it with the 545 MKII. I've had that model on the brain since I owned one for so long. They do use a servo for d/c offset in the 555 MKII. Sorry for the mis-information.
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass

    Pass Aleph 30; Adcom GFP750/Dared SL2000A; Adcom GDA600; MIT S3/Z Pc; SDA 1C; Squeezebox; Tubes add soul!

  20. #20

    Member Sales Rating: (19)

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    7,214

    Default

    Thanks H9 That's the statement I read.
    engtaz

    I love how music can brighten up a bad day.

  21. #21

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    318

    Default

    I have had both in the past and really you cannot go wrong with either amp; both are great buys for the money they sell for these days. If I ever got another I would likely hunt for one of the later Mark II versions that had a removeable power cord.

    As I recall Stereophile reviewed both (likely find online) I believe they felt that the Mark II was an "improoved" version of the original 555 for whatever that is worth. Either way you can do no wrong. Go funky and buy one of the all white albino versions...they were very cool.....

  22. #22

    Member Sales Rating: (11)

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Okc, Ok
    Posts
    877

    Default

    Ive owned both.

    If I were to buy another one, it would be the MKII. Smoother on top than the original, and better at dealing with tougher loads. Not to mention they have a better resale value, not much but still a bit.


    Dave
    Once again we meet at last.

  23. #23

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    127

    Default

    I want to thank everyone who helped make my selection in my first entry level hi-fi stereo rig.....I am the proud owner of a GFA-555 picked up locally.....completely immaculate in it's original box....tested and played right in front of me.
    Absolutely no hums...4 big ones later she went home with me....and I cannot complain...this was no ebay buy without me viewing the hardware!....
    I have a GFA-710 on it's way w/remote.....315$ after shipping....
    Tommorrow I will pick a cd player.

    Still contemplating that marantz 5 cd carousel...or maybe the 400's with a dac.....or a bluray player that does it all.....

  24. #24

    Member Sales Rating: (11)

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Dixon, IL
    Posts
    6,510

    Default

    Very nice, congrats on the new toys.

    I take it you snagged the 710 that was just up on ebay? Congrats.

    I'm likely going to be getting either a 710 or a 715 pretty soon. I'm getting a GFA-545 this weekend, so a pre-amp is next on the list.

    I'm looking forward to hearing your thoughts on the new setup once you get it all together.:)
    The nirvana inducer-
    APC H10 Power Conditioner
    Denon DVD-2910 universal player
    DPA The Little Bit Three DAC
    Yamaha P-300 turntable/TCC TC-750 phono preamp
    Acurus L10 preamp
    Adcom GFA-545 power amp
    PolkAudio SDA 2A's/PolkAudio Monitor 7A's
    Audioquest Type 4 speaker cables
    Audioquest Sidewinder IC's
    Audioquest Black Mamba IC's
    Signal Cable Analog II IC's

  25. #25

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    127

    Default

    Oppo BDP-83 wins....just pulled the trigger...I think I'll be happy with 1 cd playing at a time if it doubles for a Blueray player!...if not either way a carousel will have to wait.
    Hoping it can serve the level of dac the marantz does.....not that my ears are anywhere near experts yet.
    Cool stuff: Adcom GFA-555, GFP-710, Oppo BDP-83, Monitor 10's w/RDO198s...rebuilt and modded XO Sonicaps topside..Daytons Low.
    Benq W5000

    "Screw getting close....feels like heaven to me....fluffy polk clouds all around......"

  26. #26

    Member Sales Rating: (31)

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Long Island
    Posts
    14,186

    Default

    If not, you can always pick up an external DAC down the road.
    "He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And when you gaze long into an abyss the abyss also gazes into you." Friedrich Nietzsche

  27. #27

    Member Sales Rating: (4)

    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    3 moves from check mating you
    Posts
    3,069

    Default

    Does anybody have experience using the gfa555 with POLks' big SDA SRS's? The speakers with 8 mbs and 4 tws. in each.

    He also has a ADCOM 5802 amp. My friend who just bought the charlotte sda's has both kinds of amps and wants to know.

    He's going to join the club soon:D

    He has 2 555mk2's and would love to bridge the power in each BUT he also has seen the warning not to use bridged amps:(. Is there any way he can get around it so he can have astronomical power for his new man toys?
    Most people just listen to music and watch movies . I am glad to be a part of a select group that tries to take our auditory and visual senses to a higher level: we EXPERIENCE them.... GOT SDA?...GOT SUNFIRE? ...GOT Maggies?

  28. #28

    Member Sales Rating: (16)

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    In A Van Down By The River
    Posts
    20,707

    Default

    Don't use bridged amps with SDA's..............well actually you can't because of the common ground issue.

    The 555 is great with the big SDA's. The 5802 would be even better as it's a bit more refined than the 555 and has more reserves and is all around better amp. The 5802 is NOT common ground so you'll need to get some beefy speaker cable and tie the negative speaker terminals together to make it common ground and compatible with any SDA speaker.
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass

    Pass Aleph 30; Adcom GFP750/Dared SL2000A; Adcom GDA600; MIT S3/Z Pc; SDA 1C; Squeezebox; Tubes add soul!

  29. #29

    Member Sales Rating: (16)

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    In A Van Down By The River
    Posts
    20,707

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by heiney9 View Post
    Don't use bridged amps with SDA's..............well actually you can't because of the common ground issue.

    The 555 is great with the big SDA's. The 5802 would be even better as it's a bit more refined than the 555 and has more reserves and is all around better amp. The 5802 is NOT common ground so you'll need to get some beefy speaker cable and tie the negative speaker terminals together to make it common ground and compatible with any SDA speaker.
    H9

    P.s. DO NOT attempt to tie the terminals together on bridged amps. It will not create a common ground and the amps will go POOF with authority as well as probably damaging drivers and crossover in the SDA's
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass

    Pass Aleph 30; Adcom GFP750/Dared SL2000A; Adcom GDA600; MIT S3/Z Pc; SDA 1C; Squeezebox; Tubes add soul!

  30. #30

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    318

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tony millard View Post
    Does anybody have experience using the gfa555 with POLks' big SDA SRS's? The speakers with 8 mbs and 4 tws. in each.

    He also has a ADCOM 5802 amp. My friend who just bought the charlotte sda's has both kinds of amps and wants to know.

    He's going to join the club soon:D

    He has 2 555mk2's and would love to bridge the power in each BUT he also has seen the warning not to use bridged amps:(. Is there any way he can get around it so he can have astronomical power for his new man toys?
    I used a single GFA 555 Mark II with a pair of SDA-SRS and was very happy with the results at the time. The GFA 555 series is a great amp and can comfortably drive just about anything.

    I still think they are a great buy used. Good luck.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Adcom setup opinions
    By concealer404 in forum Electronics
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-08-2008, 12:01 PM
  2. Lsi9s w/ Parasound Halo A23: sub needed/desirable?
    By Norm Apter in forum 2 Channel Audio
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 05-07-2008, 05:37 PM
  3. Adcom GTP-502 opinions, please
    By strider in forum 2 Channel Audio
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-19-2007, 09:34 AM
  4. Adcom 5503 opinions???
    By dougr in forum Electronics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-20-2007, 12:08 AM
  5. Opinions on these amps..Adcom, Shure, SAE
    By hoopdaaron in forum Electronics
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-13-2004, 09:00 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts