Free Shipping on All Orders 1-866-764-1801

Vist our Online Store
+ Reply to Thread
Page 5 of 9 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 LastLast
Results 121 to 150 of 252
  1. #121

    Member Sales Rating: (11)

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Toronto, ON, Canada
    Posts
    2,018

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by madmax View Post
    Most EE's are idiots when it comes to high fidelity. I know, I am one and I work with a bunch of others. I know only two other EE's who underderstand anything about audio beyond what they can theorize using typical equations. Its just too complex for them to comprehend.
    madmax
    If you want to insult yourself, feel free, but don't insult the smart people. I am an EE and I don't own bose.
    Panasonic PT-AE4000U projector for movies
    EluneVision 92" Cinema Gray fixed screen
    Onkyo TX-SR805 Pre/Pro
    Rotel RMB-1075 Amp
    B&W CDM1-SE fronts
    B&W CDM-CNT center
    B&W CDM1 rears
    Samsung DTB-H260F OTA HDTV tuner
    DUAL NHT SubTwo subwoofers
    Velodyne SMS-1
    Oppo BDP-93 Blu-Ray player
    Belkin PF60 Power Center
    Harmony 890 RF remote
    Panasonic TC-P50G20 TV + PS3 in the living room

  2. #122

    Member Sales Rating: (14)

    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Live Free or Die
    Posts
    10,965

    Default

    If I may m ake a quick comment about the blind vs. non-blind tests : I ask those that are so quick to discredit blind A B tests, which based on evidence here seems like a valid criticism, you have to at least be open to the idea that NON-blind comparisons are tainted by the subject's knowledge and bias towards certain products.

    Cables and power outlets and - although most doubtful - fuses may have some difference to those with "golden ears", but if you discredit the most common scientific ways of determining difference, and base your entire opinion on what is by definition a flawed and biased listening test (there's a reason why things like drug trials are double blind - placebo effect), what makes the non-blind test more valid than the blind one? Because it gets the results you expect / want?

    Honest question; again, I'm open to the possibility that these sonic but unmeasurable differences may exist - I certainly don't have the system or heraing capacity to test it out - but to those of you who insist you KNOW, I have to ask how you can know any more than the doubters can claim to know that you're wrong. Bias and placebo are well-defined phenomenon, why are they invalid in your testing?
    If you will it, dude, it is no dream.

  3. #123

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    68

    Default

    Thanks Bob, and F1. I don't dismiss the blind listening test because of analytical vs. emotional sides of the brain are involved. I think the PET test could rectify this question regardless of which side of the brain you are using. The book Change Your Brain Change Your Life was based on PET results. So hook up the PS Audio engineers to the scanner and use science to decide if they can tell the difference in a blind study.
    And if it takes hours, days or weeks to decide on which product sounds better, buy the less expensive one, you will never know the difference.

    G

  4. #124

    Member Sales Rating: (16)

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Andromeda
    Posts
    14,411

    Default

    :D keiko's rolling again :D
    Fixed


    This was an informative read and interesting write up on DK's part until the soul mates arrived. Now I'm just amused at the hypocrisy. I wish Willy, moon and all the naysayers the best of luck with their crusade. Saving CP one thread at a time. Thanks boys! ;)

  5. #125

    Member Sales Rating: (10)

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Cape Cod, Massachusetts
    Posts
    1,286

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bobman1235 View Post
    If I may m ake a quick comment about the blind vs. non-blind tests : I ask those that are so quick to discredit blind A B tests, which based on evidence here seems like a valid criticism, you have to at least be open to the idea that NON-blind comparisons are tainted by the subject's knowledge and bias towards certain products.

    Cables and power outlets and - although most doubtful - fuses may have some difference to those with "golden ears", but if you discredit the most common scientific ways of determining difference, and base your entire opinion on what is by definition a flawed and biased listening test (there's a reason why things like drug trials are double blind - placebo effect), what makes the non-blind test more valid than the blind one? Because it gets the results you expect / want?

    Honest question; again, I'm open to the possibility that these sonic but unmeasurable differences may exist - I certainly don't have the system or heraing capacity to test it out - but to those of you who insist you KNOW, I have to ask how you can know any more than the doubters can claim to know that you're wrong. Bias and placebo are well-defined phenomenon, why are they invalid in your testing?
    I am of the opinion that it takes a while to "get a feel" for how a system sounds, regardless of the component being switched. I've made many changes in my system over the past couple years, some of which at first sounds very similar to the previous component. But after days/weeks, subtleties started coming out. And it wasn't always that I was replacing something with a more expensive item, so I wasn't "wishing" it to sound better because I just paid a lot of money for said item.

    When I added my first power amp to my system, it sounded good, but not drastically different from my receiver. But when I decided to sell that amp to try something different, I temporarily went back to my receiver and I noticed that something was lacking -- it just sounded kind of flat. I needed to spend some time with the amp before realizing what it was doing for the sound.

    I've made several other changes in my system (preamp, cables, CD player, etc), and sometimes I've noticed differences right away, sometimes they have taken a while to sink in.

    To me, a quick A/B swap (double blind or otherwise) of anything is not a good way to determine if there's a difference.

    Same holds true for other things too. I play golf casually, and tennis much more than casually. I've played tennis my whole life, and have gone through many tennis racquet's in that time. I can pick up any racquet and play with it, and most any decent brand/string/string tension will feel good enough to hit with. But it's only after playing with a racquet for a week or two that you recognize the subtleties of it, what you like and don't like about it, and determine if it'll be the one you keep. Some people might think string is all the same? Wrong. I don't know how to measure it, but each type of string plays differently. Only a very good player with an intimate knowledge of their particular racquet will be able to tell the difference, but it's there as anyone in to the sport will be able to tell you.

    I think this same concept applies to audio.

    I don't normally chime in on these topics, as they are typically filled with emotional people on both sides of the topic, but I figured I'd get my 2c in here somewhere.
    Speakers: Polk LSi15
    Pre: Adcom GFP-750 with HT Bypass
    Amp: Pass Labs X-150
    CD/DVD Player: Classe CDP-10
    Interconnects: MIT Shortgun S3 Pro XLR
    Speaker cables: MIT MH-750 bi-wire
    TT:Micro Seiki DD-35
    Cartridge:Denon DL-160
    Phono Pre:PS Audio GCPH

  6. #126

    Member Sales Rating: (3)

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    SDA SweetSpot
    Posts
    5,364

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bobman1235 View Post
    I am bitter.
    Bitter? Over audio? Over how someone is pursuing a hobby? Over words on a computer screen that you can (theoretically) easily ignore? I'd hate to see how you would react to a real problem.

    Quote Originally Posted by bobman1235 View Post
    Have fun on your high horse, don't fall off.
    Come on now...that's just not fair. Might I remind you that I am not the one going all over the forum telling people about my (unverified) physics degree and my (unverified) 10 journal papers. I am not the one going around questioning people's education. I'm not the one going around thread crapping and injecting myself into discussions that I have no real interest in.

    I'm just here talking about audio topics of interest to me. If someone is not interested in what I am talking about, there is no reason to be bitter about it....just go find something that you do like and talk about that. You don't see me down in the Car Audio section of the forum chastising the fellows who are damaging their hearing with those 210 dB subwoofers do you?;)
    "Polk SDA-SRSs are hopelessly out of date both sonically and technologically... I see no value whatsoever in older SDA speakers."~Audio Asylum Member
    __________________
    "Knowledge, without understanding, is a path to failure."~DK

  7. #127

    Member Sales Rating: (3)

    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    2,399

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by heiney9 View Post
    So Bike, is it also your opinion that fuses which are in the signal path do nothing to alter the sound? I have a pair of vintage Polk's where the tweeter is fused, I am in the process of bypassing the fuse entirely. I hope to hear a benefit. Not sure the office rig I use the Monitor's in, while a computer fan is running in the background, I'll be able to discern a difference.

    You are an EE so what you say? I understand you have admitted that you can;t hear differences.........but I'd like to know how you would interpret OHM's law on this one.

    H9
    As I have said 10 times fuses are a resister with low ohms and they will react to all frequencies in a neutral manner. I have no EE degree and never said it did.

  8. #128

    Member Sales Rating: (3)

    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    2,399

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bobman1235 View Post
    If I may m ake a quick comment about the blind vs. non-blind tests : I ask those that are so quick to discredit blind A B tests, which based on evidence here seems like a valid criticism, you have to at least be open to the idea that NON-blind comparisons are tainted by the subject's knowledge and bias towards certain products.

    Cables and power outlets and - although most doubtful - fuses may have some difference to those with "golden ears", but if you discredit the most common scientific ways of determining difference, and base your entire opinion on what is by definition a flawed and biased listening test (there's a reason why things like drug trials are double blind - placebo effect), what makes the non-blind test more valid than the blind one? Because it gets the results you expect / want?

    Honest question; again, I'm open to the possibility that these sonic but unmeasurable differences may exist - I certainly don't have the system or heraing capacity to test it out - but to those of you who insist you KNOW, I have to ask how you can know any more than the doubters can claim to know that you're wrong. Bias and placebo are well-defined phenomenon, why are they invalid in your testing?
    Thanks for a little sanity and clear logic. I wonder what the collective IQ is on this forum.

  9. #129

    Member Sales Rating: (16)

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    In A Van Down By The River
    Posts
    21,237

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bikezappa View Post
    As I have said 10 times fuses are a resister with low ohms and they will react to all frequencies in a neutral manner. I have no EE degree and never said it did.
    Again you didn;t answer the question. I asked if I eliminated the fuse (taking it away from the circuit) and using the copper stranded hook-up wire supplied in the x-over; is it your opinion there would be no change in sound or measurement?

    Also if a fuse is made from brass, copper, tin plated nickle, plated gold, steel, you still believe it reacts to all frequencies in a neutral manner? Do you believe all metals sound the same? You seem to infer that in many of your posts, but I'd like you to clarify so I don;t mistakenly attribute that as your POV.

    H9
    Last edited by heiney9; 08-19-2009 at 07:42 PM.
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass

    Pass Aleph 30; Eastern Electric Mini Max; Adcom GDA600; MIT S3/Z Pc; SDA 1C; Squeezebox; Tubes add soul!

  10. #130

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    68

    Default

    Another great reply tcrossma. I learn a lot on this forum as well as others. Small differences can make an impact over time. And if DK can hear all those sonic improvements immediately, I'm not going to argue about it, maybe a I'm a little jealous about it.
    Another thought about F1's reply to my blind test comparison. The article justifies it's position that blind tests are faulty by bringing up the most ludicrous blind test anyone has ever heard of and saying see, blind tests are ludicrous. Hardly convincing, but the PET scans would take all of the emotion out of the equation. If DK can use his extensive EE to prove out the technical benefits of the equipment he chooses then why can't an ambitious audio video writer set up a test using a PET scan to see if anyone, expert or novice can detect a difference in equipment. I just hate for scientific methods of measurements to be used solely to prove a technical difference and not a perceptible difference.
    Pie in the sky I sure, no manufacturer of extremely high accessories would agree to such a test. If someone from a company such as Audioquest could not tell the difference between their interconnects and Better Cables interconnects it would have a negative impact on their business.

    G

  11. #131

    Member Sales Rating: (3)

    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    2,399

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tcrossma View Post
    I am of the opinion that it takes a while to "get a feel" for how a system sounds, regardless of the component being switched. I've made many changes in my system over the past couple years, some of which at first sounds very similar to the previous component. But after days/weeks, subtleties started coming out. And it wasn't always that I was replacing something with a more expensive item, so I wasn't "wishing" it to sound better because I just paid a lot of money for said item.

    When I added my first power amp to my system, it sounded good, but not drastically different from my receiver. But when I decided to sell that amp to try something different, I temporarily went back to my receiver and I noticed that something was lacking -- it just sounded kind of flat. I needed to spend some time with the amp before realizing what it was doing for the sound.

    I've made several other changes in my system (preamp, cables, CD player, etc), and sometimes I've noticed differences right away, sometimes they have taken a while to sink in.

    To me, a quick A/B swap (double blind or otherwise) of anything is not a good way to determine if there's a difference.

    Same holds true for other things too. I play golf casually, and tennis much more than casually. I've played tennis my whole life, and have gone through many tennis racquet's in that time. I can pick up any racquet and play with it, and most any decent brand/string/string tension will feel good enough to hit with. But it's only after playing with a racquet for a week or two that you recognize the subtleties of it, what you like and don't like about it, and determine if it'll be the one you keep. Some people might think string is all the same? Wrong. I don't know how to measure it, but each type of string plays differently. Only a very good player with an intimate knowledge of their particular racquet will be able to tell the difference, but it's there as anyone in to the sport will be able to tell you.

    I think this same concept applies to audio.

    I don't normally chime in on these topics, as they are typically filled with emotional people on both sides of the topic, but I figured I'd get my 2c in here somewhere.
    The DB blind tests that I refer to allow the user to listen with any music for any amount of time with with complete control of the switch system that compares the two components. For example if you want to compare two amplifiers you connect them up with the switch and listen and switch for weeks if you want in your home with any music you want. In the end however, some one comes to your home and switches the amplifiers in a DB test. Check out the Audio Critic for more details of his DB test. No one to date can tell the difference to date.

    I agree that most DB tests are bad. And that you need to get comfortable with the equipment first.

  12. #132

    Member Sales Rating: (3)

    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    2,399

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DarqueKnight View Post
    Come on now...that's just not fair. Might I remind you that I am not the one going all over the forum telling people about my (unverified) physics degree and my (unverified) 10 journal papers. I am not the one going around questioning people's education. you?;)
    First I never questionmed your education.

    Put your money where you month is. Want to bet that I can prove I have a degree in Physics and can cite my 10 papers.

    And your above quote just questioned my education yet you state that you are not questioning people's education.

    Stop pulling peoples legs and admit you made all this up.

    Or explain how fuses can filter noise.

  13. #133

    Member Sales Rating: (31)

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Long Island
    Posts
    14,789

    Default

    Since when did this become an ego battle.

    Who besides you gives a **** that you had papers published?
    "He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And when you gaze long into an abyss the abyss also gazes into you." Friedrich Nietzsche

  14. #134

    Member Sales Rating: (3)

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    SDA SweetSpot
    Posts
    5,364

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by unc2701 View Post
    Patent for his AC filter attached. It's more of a traditional filter than the slipstream product, which I can honestly claim I have no clue WTF that's all about. However, looking at the sizes & amperages of them, it's safe to say that particular product wouldn't fit in a fuse of the sizes you've got.

    Have you seen a technical document for the slipstream filter? I haven't found one.
    I have read the technical description and specs for the small Slipstream purifiers (1/3" in diameter by 1" long, 1000V/4.3A) on the Bybee Technologies website (www.bybeetech.com).
    "Polk SDA-SRSs are hopelessly out of date both sonically and technologically... I see no value whatsoever in older SDA speakers."~Audio Asylum Member
    __________________
    "Knowledge, without understanding, is a path to failure."~DK

  15. #135

    Member Sales Rating: (14)

    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Live Free or Die
    Posts
    10,965

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DarqueKnight View Post
    Bitter? Over audio? Over how someone is pursuing a hobby? Over words on a computer screen that you can (theoretically) easily ignore? I'd hate to see how you would react to a real problem.
    Nothing to do with audio, I'm bitter over your attitude. You know exactly what you're doing when you talk down to people and dismiss their arguments as if they're below you. Just like you dismiss my complaints and comments. I can ignore you, and no, this thread has nothing to do with me, but it doesn't mean I'm not interested. My other post here is a legitimate question; while I don't believe you when you say a fuse can make a significant difference, I find the topic interesting, and the faith some people put into the unverifiable claims literally fascinating.


    Come on now...that's just not fair. Might I remind you that I am not the one going all over the forum telling people about my (unverified) physics degree and my (unverified) 10 journal papers. I am not the one going around questioning people's education.
    ORLY?

    Quote Originally Posted by DarqueKnight
    I received my Ph.D. from Tulane University in New Orleans, Louisiana. Tulane overall ranks in the top 50 among United States research universities.

    Etc
    Etc
    Etc
    If someone is not interested in what I am talking about, there is no reason to be bitter about it....just go find something that you do like and talk about that.
    Again, you're putting out a review of something. THe people questioning it - bikezappa in particular, but a few others as well - aren't here because they are not interested, they're here because they ARE interested but hold a viewpoint that does not match yours. I know the "cable debate" is beaten to death around here, but it's a debate nonetheless; you posted this review here to what end? Just so people would take your word for it? Or did you want some discussion to spring from it other than people kissing your ass? Because there's discussion here, some of it valid and p ossibly interesting if you could be so kind as to actually engage in it.

    I asked a serious question and tcrossma gave an excellent and well-reasoned response without coming off like... well, you.
    If you will it, dude, it is no dream.

  16. #136

    Member Sales Rating: (31)

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Long Island
    Posts
    14,789

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bobman1235 View Post
    Rah, rah, rah
    "He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And when you gaze long into an abyss the abyss also gazes into you." Friedrich Nietzsche

  17. #137

    Member Sales Rating: (4)

    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    3,326

    Default

    Regardless of the topics and discussions at hand, there are some cool Classics Tags here ~

    bobman has short fuse, keiko trolling again, let's play make believe!, m2threadcrappers, m2zappa-lovers united, more f1nut bulling, the world is now flat!, what is a fuse?
    We all got to do something about insulting each other.
    Trying out Different Audio Cables is a Religious Affair. You don't discuss it with anyone.

  18. #138

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    68

    Default

    In DK's defense, I love his analytical approach to hifi and bike was coming on a little strong but the cable debate will rage for years, not sure about the fuse debate. You would think a directional fuse would be more than just a fuse. Bikezappa knows how gullible people can be (me included) and I like his opposing viewpoint. If you don't have a badass system like DK has are we little people suppose to glean anything from this discussion about fuses? Personally I don't even know why I am still on this thread, I don't plan on replacing my fuses anyway.

    G

  19. #139

    Member Sales Rating: (3)

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    SDA SweetSpot
    Posts
    5,364

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bobman1235 View Post
    ORLY?
    Bob, seems you missed this, but if you go back and re-read post #61, I quoted a post from Hearingimpared which, in turn quoted a question from BZ asking where my EE degree came from and if I had any published papers in an IEEE journal, as if that had some significance to my posting on an audio forum:

    Quote Originally Posted by bikezappa View Post
    I wonder where DK got a EE? Has he published any papers in a EE Journal?

    Please show me these. DK is pulling your leg with EE crap.
    Didn't he say please show me these? He seemed to be in need and I, just that once, accomodated him. In turn, I asked for evidence of his credentials and journal publications and he has not been forthcoming.

    I generally don't bring up or discuss my professional or educational background here unless someone specifically asks. I don't come here to debate science, discuss journal papers, or academic degrees. I get quite enough of that at work. I come here mainly to discuss (not argue about) audio. It's one of my hobbies.

    Quote Originally Posted by bobman1235 View Post
    Nothing to do with audio, I'm bitter over your attitude.
    Well, it's unfortunate that you see things that way Bob. You should seriously consider an immediate and drastic reduction in the amount of space I occupy in your mind. I think perhaps you are a bit too sensitive and you read more into what I write than what is there.

    Again, if you find me such an offensive person, just "turn me off" and never see another word I write. It is so easy to be happy, especially on the INTERNET. You act like a moth attracted to a flame. Don't you want to be happy?

    Quote Originally Posted by bobman1235 View Post
    Just like you dismiss my complaints and comments.
    You talk like that's a bad thing.:p

    Quote Originally Posted by bobman1235 View Post
    ...while I don't believe you when you say a fuse can make a significant difference, I find the topic interesting, and the faith some people put into the unverifiable claims literally fascinating.
    Hmmmmm...you don't believe something, yet you find the topic fascinating. Then, you want to participate in a discussion about that thing you don't believe in that was initiated by someone you find offensive. I don't get it.

    Quote Originally Posted by bobman1235 View Post
    I asked a serious question and tcrossma gave an excellent and well-reasoned response without coming off like... well, you.
    ...and you come off like someone with an obese porcupine permanently lodged in his butt. For example:

    Quote Originally Posted by bobman1235 View Post
    I am bitter. YOu're a passive-aggressive jackass intellectual who obviously thinks he's above everyone. ANd like most people who are full of themselves, you pretend to be magnanimous when in fact you're just a giant hypocrite who resorts to the same tactics you decry in others.

    Have fun on your high horse, don't fall off.
    I'm glad you were able to get that off your chest. Feel better now?

    But I digress. Seems like the answer is simple: If Tcrossma's style of discussion is more to your liking, then why don't you just talk to him and ignore me? Won't you be happy then? Don't you want to be happy?
    Last edited by DarqueKnight; 08-19-2009 at 09:38 PM.
    "Polk SDA-SRSs are hopelessly out of date both sonically and technologically... I see no value whatsoever in older SDA speakers."~Audio Asylum Member
    __________________
    "Knowledge, without understanding, is a path to failure."~DK

  20. #140

    Member Sales Rating: (3)

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    SDA SweetSpot
    Posts
    5,364

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bobman1235 View Post
    I asked a serious question and tcrossma gave an excellent and well-reasoned response without coming off like... well, you.
    Let's look at a response from your mentor. This was gathered from a post by Hearingimpared wherein your mentor was quoted:

    Quote Originally Posted by bikezappa View Post
    I think it's all bull crap science. Anyone that starts his post with Studies raises a red flag and is way into himself.
    This was BZ's first comment in this thread. Was this, by your standards, an excellent and well-reasoned response? Do you think this was an approprioate way to begin an intelligent inquiry?
    "Polk SDA-SRSs are hopelessly out of date both sonically and technologically... I see no value whatsoever in older SDA speakers."~Audio Asylum Member
    __________________
    "Knowledge, without understanding, is a path to failure."~DK

  21. #141

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    North of New Orleans
    Posts
    3,326

    Default

    Many people on here hold on to their beliefs religiously and they react predictably when their "religion" is questioned or attacked.
    As such arguing "religion" is futile.

  22. #142

    Member Sales Rating: (13)

    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    The Mars Hotel
    Posts
    31,262

    Default

    If I may make a quick comment about the blind vs. non-blind tests : I ask those that are so quick to discredit blind A B tests, which based on evidence here seems like a valid criticism, you have to at least be open to the idea that NON-blind comparisons are tainted by the subject's knowledge and bias towards certain products.
    I'll grant you that for some that is probably true, yet for others it's definitely not. From my personal experience, I obtained a $2300.00 (could have been $2600) power cord to demo. I wanted/expected it to out perform the $500.00 one I had, but after giving it more than a fair chance I preferred the $500.00 cord. Another example involved interconnects and again I wanted/expected the fancier, more expensive IC to sound better, it didn't. Yet, another involved a pair of highly praised $28,000.00 speakers verses a pair that cost $2400.00. I hated the more expensive pair and could not understand how anyone could find the sound pleasing despite really wanting/expecting them to blow me away.
    'Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."

  23. #143

    Member Sales Rating: (14)

    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Live Free or Die
    Posts
    10,965

    Default

    Hmmmmm...you don't believe something, yet you find the topic fascinating. Then, you want to participate in a discussion about that thing you don't believe in that was initiated by someone you find offensive. I don't get it.
    What's not to get? I can't find something interesting just because I'm skeptical? THat's exactly why I find it interesting, and I find everyone's comments on it interesting; I don't have much to add to these discussions so I just usually read them and take away information, but your attitude towards my "mentor" (you're so mature) made me want to comment.

    It's not really that tough to understand, I would think your massive intellect could grasp someone having a bit of intellectual curiosity on something even if they don't necessarily agree with it. I love reading about religion too, doesn't mean I believe it all.

    You should seriously consider an immediate and drastic reduction in the amount of space I occupy in your mind.
    You've spent far more time and words on your responses to me than I to you, chief.


    I do like the short fuse tag though. Clever :D
    If you will it, dude, it is no dream.

  24. #144

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Las Vegas, Nevada
    Posts
    916

    Default

    This thread turned into a flame war?! I'm shocked!!!
    Do you hear that buzzing noise?

  25. #145

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Las Vegas, Nevada
    Posts
    916

    Default

    I should add one more comment - whenever I see Keiko post, I make sure to go back and review all pages to make sure I haven't missed any good soft-porn pics!
    Do you hear that buzzing noise?

  26. #146

    Member Sales Rating: (2)

    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    El, Paso TX
    Posts
    293

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by F1nut View Post
    I'll grant you that for some that is probably true, yet for others it's definitely not. From my personal experience, I obtained a $2300.00 (could have been $2600) power cord to demo. I wanted/expected it to out perform the $500.00 one I had, but after giving it more than a fair chance I preferred the $500.00 cord. Another example involved interconnects and again I wanted/expected the fancier, more expensive IC to sound better, it didn't. Yet, another involved a pair of highly praised $28,000.00 speakers verses a pair that cost $2400.00. I hated the more expensive pair and could not understand how anyone could find the sound pleasing despite really wanting/expecting them to blow me away.

    I have no idea how much money you make or what system you currently have, however in that situation you are comparing extremes. If I could only afford 2400 speakers why would I listen to 28,000 speakers to compare them to anyways?

  27. #147

    Member Sales Rating: (3)

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    SDA SweetSpot
    Posts
    5,364

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bobman1235 View Post
    You've spent far more time and words on your responses to me than I to you, chief.
    Really? I don't know if that's true or not. I'm certainly not whining about or preoccupied with your personality or attitude:

    Quote Originally Posted by bobman1235 View Post
    I am bitter.
    Quote Originally Posted by bobman1235 View Post
    I'm bitter over your attitude.
    Quote Originally Posted by bobman1235 View Post
    ...you dismiss my complaints and comments.
    Quote Originally Posted by bobman1235 View Post
    ...I can ignore you, and no, this thread has nothing to do with me, but it doesn't mean I'm not interested.
    Quote Originally Posted by bobman1235 View Post
    YOu're a passive-aggressive jackass intellectual who obviously thinks he's above everyone. ANd like most people who are full of themselves, you pretend to be magnanimous when in fact you're just a giant hypocrite who resorts to the same tactics you decry in others.

    Have fun on your high horse, don't fall off.
    And finally, this gem, which was your first post in this thread, which had nothing to do with the subject of the thread, but...was...all...about...lil...'ol...me:

    Quote Originally Posted by bobman1235 View Post
    Funny how when someone who agrees with you and praises you calls others "losers" you're not so quick to dismiss him, eh Doc?

    I can't imagine how quickly you'd pounce on someone denouncing YOU as the loser.
    Are you sure your name shouldn't be "woman1235"? You sure act like a scorned woman.
    Last edited by DarqueKnight; 08-19-2009 at 11:10 PM.
    "Polk SDA-SRSs are hopelessly out of date both sonically and technologically... I see no value whatsoever in older SDA speakers."~Audio Asylum Member
    __________________
    "Knowledge, without understanding, is a path to failure."~DK

  28. #148

    Member Sales Rating: (14)

    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Live Free or Die
    Posts
    10,965

    Default

    Mmm, who's name-calling now?
    If you will it, dude, it is no dream.

  29. #149

    Member Sales Rating: (4)

    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    3,326

    Default

    Fascinating!
    Trying out Different Audio Cables is a Religious Affair. You don't discuss it with anyone.

  30. #150

    Member Sales Rating: (3)

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    SDA SweetSpot
    Posts
    5,364

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nduitch View Post
    If I could only afford 2400 speakers why would I listen to 28,000 speakers to compare them to anyways?
    Assuming a $28,000 speaker's quality and performance is commensurate with its price, it is good to audition a state of the art or near state of the art item just to get a benchmark on where your gear is performance wise. Often people find that a much more expensive item only offers incremental improvements and are not worth the price. Such an experience can generate higher satisfaction with what you already have if it stacks up favorably with a higher performance, much higher cost item.

    Ideally, your income is going to increase and you will be able to afford better and better gear. There is nothing wrong with becoming familiar with the performance characteristics of gear currently out of your reach. Often, features on state of the art gear trickles down to mid level gear. If a piece of gear within your means shows up with a "trickled down" feature or performance characteristic you are already familiar with, your prior audition experience can help you make a more informed buying decision.
    "Polk SDA-SRSs are hopelessly out of date both sonically and technologically... I see no value whatsoever in older SDA speakers."~Audio Asylum Member
    __________________
    "Knowledge, without understanding, is a path to failure."~DK

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 37
    Last Post: 06-24-2012, 06:22 PM
  2. Replies: 67
    Last Post: 12-17-2011, 02:07 AM
  3. Replies: 15
    Last Post: 03-22-2010, 08:16 AM
  4. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-29-2009, 11:01 PM
  5. Replies: 41
    Last Post: 02-22-2009, 11:49 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts