Free Shipping on All Orders 1-866-764-1801

Vist our Online Store
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1

    Member Sales Rating: (3)

    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    2,381

    Default SDA's for DTS sound

    I have two sets of Polk SDAs. The big daddy SRS 1.2 and a 2.3 and would like to use them in a 5.1 or DTS system. I would need to get an third set od SDA's for the center. Has anyone done this and are there any problems doing this. Would you use the inter connect cable in the front or just use them as separate speakers. I have found that using the polks SDA's as front spreakers only in the 5.1 system doesn't work, they over power everything else. Is this a crazy idea?

  2. #2

    Member Sales Rating: (13)

    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    The Mars Hotel
    Posts
    30,443

    Default

    I'm quessing your going to use the 2.3TL's as rears and the 1.2's as fronts, right? You've got a timbre match problem here as the TL's use a different tweeter. Maybe you will not notice it, but I just wanted you to be aware of that. For the center some folks use the SDA CRS+ which is a timbre match to your 1.2's. Some use the LSi/C and report good results and one guy is planning on using a single modified RTA 15TL as a center to timbre match both his front 1.2TL's, 2.3TL's and his rear RTA 11TL's. Looking at your set up, I think you may want to go with the SDA CRS+ as a center, at least it would match your fronts.
    'Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."

  3. #3

    Member Sales Rating: (3)

    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    2,381

    Default

    F1 nut

    Thanks for the advice about the tweeters. I have not listened to both sets of SDA's in the same room. This may be a problem, but I think I can live with it and love all the advantages of such a set up. My reason for thinking of going with 2 or 3 sets of SDA's in a home theater room is the wide sound stage they present. Do I really need a center with the polks? I wonder what would be the effect and if anyone else has done it. Some is good, more is better, and too much is just right!

  4. #4

    Member Sales Rating: (13)

    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    The Mars Hotel
    Posts
    30,443

    Default

    Why not try the 2 pair together first and see what you think. With the phantom center you might decide that's all you need. I tried to tell you about the timbre situation in the Flea Market, but I quess you didn't see it. Post back here what you discover.

    F1
    'Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."

  5. #5

    Member Sales Rating: (3)

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    SDA SweetSpot
    Posts
    5,196

    Post SDA's Rock

    bikezappa,

    I used a pair of CRS+'s for a while as my center channels to go with a pair of SDA SRS (original) front speakers. As you would expect, the timbre match was seamless. However, I did not like the bulky look of the CRS+'s above my RPTV. I replaced the CRS+'s with two LSiC's and have been happy sonically and aesthetically ever since. In my system, the LSiC and LSi15 are excellent timbre matches for the SDA SRS.

    I tried running a phantom center with just the SRS's. It worked, but I missed the sonic impact that a dedicated center speaker provides.

    I was also using a pair of SDA 1B's as surround speakers. I replaced the 1B's with a pair of LSi15's. Putting the 1B's in the rear as surround speakers was a waste of their sonic attributes.
    "Polk SDA-SRSs are hopelessly out of date both sonically and technologically... I see no value whatsoever in older SDA speakers."~Audio Asylum Member
    __________________
    "Knowledge, without understanding, is a path to failure."~DK

  6. #6

    Member Sales Rating: (13)

    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    The Mars Hotel
    Posts
    30,443

    Default

    raife,

    How do you think his 1.2 and 2.3TL will match up?

    F1
    'Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."

  7. #7

    Member Sales Rating: (3)

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    SDA SweetSpot
    Posts
    5,196

    Post SL2000/SL3000TL

    I have never heard the 2.3TL's. I do have the 1.2TL's and they were not a good timbre match for the CRS+'s. Since bikezappa would be using the 2.3TL's for surrounds, timbre matching might not be that big of a deal.
    "Polk SDA-SRSs are hopelessly out of date both sonically and technologically... I see no value whatsoever in older SDA speakers."~Audio Asylum Member
    __________________
    "Knowledge, without understanding, is a path to failure."~DK

  8. #8

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    957

    Default 2.3TL's as rears not a good idea...

    Originally Posted by raife1:
    I have never heard the 2.3TL's. I do have the 1.2TL's
    The 2.3TL's and 1.2TL's almost the same, a little bit sweeter that produces the 1.2TL's.

    If your planning for timbre matching, make sure you are
    using the same tweeter.

    Har

  9. #9
    Old School
    Member Sales Rating: (1)

    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Higher & Dryer, Texas
    Posts
    10,176

    Default

    Har,
    Good argument for me to leave those Austin 1.2TL's be. I've nailed f/x1000's, a CS400 and a CS350 for surrounds, center and rear center respectively to go with my SRS's...
    More later,
    Tour...
    Vox Copuli
    Better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt. - Old English Proverb

    "It's easy to get lost in price vs performance vs ego vs illusion." - doro
    "There is a certain entertainment value in ripping the occaisonal (sic) buttmunch..." - TroyD
    "Death doesn't come with a Uhaul." - Dennis Gardner

    Rebuilding Maggie 2-ch & Amazing 2-ch... Building 2-ch "wall"... Figuring out the HT

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts