Buy Direct M-F 9am - 10:30pm EST 1-866-764-1801

Vist our Online Store
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: CD vs MP3

  1. #1

    Member Sales Rating: (1)

    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    1,595

    Default CD vs MP3

    I just got my first real system set up. Right now I've got a Yamaha 465 driving 2 M60's and a CS1, no sub or rears. Is there going to be a huge difference between MP3 and CD? All of my CDs have been converted to MP3, so they are all in boxes currently. My AVR has a portable input to hook my mp3 player up but I was also thinking about getting a fairly inexpensive used single or 5 disk CD changer, is there a huge difference in sound quality that would make this a good option or should I be fine just hooking in my MP3 player?

  2. #2

    Member Sales Rating: (26)

    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Salinas, CA
    Posts
    5,018

    Default

    Welcome!

    Don't have any experience at all with your setup, nor do I know how well you hear things but if you're looking to stream music through your system I'd recommend a good lossless file-type. I hate mp3's, and have just started re-buying all my old cd's I used to have just because I can hear all the flaws in my music. All depends how revealing your setup really is. Play around with it, you won't know what you'll like unless you try :D
    Truck setup
    Alpine 9856
    Phoenix Gold RSD65CS

    For Sale
    Polk SR6500
    Polk SR5250
    Polk SR104



    Quote Originally Posted by heiney9 View Post
    Any clue how to use the internet? Found it in about 10 sec.

  3. #3

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Silicon Valley
    Posts
    4,640

    Default

    Depends on what you like. If you want to hear every note in the recording then the CD, or a high-res download, is best. If you want to hear damaged, muffled, sonically impaired music then MP3s are best. Of course, the better your equipment, the more apparent the differences between the two formats.

  4. #4

    Member Sales Rating: (16)

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    In A Van Down By The River
    Posts
    20,710

    Default

    YES. End of discussion
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass

    Pass Aleph 30; Adcom GFP750/Dared SL2000A; Adcom GDA600; MIT S3/Z Pc; SDA 1C; Squeezebox; Tubes add soul!

  5. #5

    Member Sales Rating: (1)

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    502

    Default

    The way I see it, there are two factors at play.

    First off, are your rips higher than 128kbps? If I have mp3s, although most of what I listen to is lossless, they are in 320. I find it to be extremely difficult to tell between 320 and lossless such as WAV. WAV will always be "better" than lossy compressions.

    Also, one thing I noticed when connecting my ipod from the 3.5mm headphone jack into the RCA connections on my receiver was that the poor conversion process from the ipod's DAC hurt my playback noticeably. Once I purchased a USB transit device that output a digital signal to my receiver and let the receiver do the conversion processing, it sounded noticeably better!

    But, I would say that a CD player playing your CDs will sound better than connecting through your mp3 player to play lossily compressed audio. Although you can probably be happy with either assuming your not a nit-picky audiophile like me.

  6. #6

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    404

    Default

    I will add it will be on a cd by cd basis. it will also depend on how the cd was mastered.
    I made a test between a bunch of CD's, ripping them into MP3, flac, and CD, and in some the difference was noticible between MP3 and Flac/CD. There was no difference between flac and CD.

    However for most of the music I listen there was not noticible difference. I ripped the MP3 into 320Kbps.
    Last keep in mind this is just my observations using my gear in my house. You can see my signature for details on my gear.

    As of now all my CD's are ripped to flac and I use a USB in front of my receiver - using the DAC of my receiver for all processing.
    I would not even consider a dedicated CD player at this point.
    Current HT setup
    Mains: B&W 804s
    Center: Polk CSi5
    Surround: Polk FXi3
    Sub: Velodyne DLS-3750R
    Receiver: Pioneer SC-07
    Amplifier: Sunfire TGA5200
    TV: Sony KDS60A2020
    DBP: Sony DBP-S350
    CDP: Pioneer DV-48AV
    Interconnect cables: SignalCable analog II
    speaker cables: SignalCable Ultra Speaker Cables Bi-wire

  7. #7

    Member Sales Rating: (5)

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Jackson, Ms.
    Posts
    2,329

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BlueFox View Post
    Depends on what you like. If you want to hear every note in the recording then the CD, or a high-res download, is best. If you want to hear damaged, muffled, sonically impaired music then MP3s are best. Of course, the better your equipment, the more apparent the differences between the two formats.
    Oh SCHNAPP! You went there, yes you did!

    +1

    Even high-bitrate mp3's sound pretty nasty when compared to lossless/uncompressed source.

  8. #8

    Member Sales Rating: (1)

    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    1,595

    Default

    Bluefox ---- ok I get the point LOL

    Now I do have a upconverting DVD player hooked up.. if I only want single disc.. it should handle this just fine as a normal CD player without much difference from a CD exclusive player? I know this may be a stupid question but just verifying.... it sounds fine but I didn't know if an exclusive CD player would make a sound difference. my qualm with using the DVD player though is that I can't see the display for time of each song unless i turn on the TV or which I don't always want to deal with, whereas with a CD player the time and track will be displayed.

  9. #9

    Member Sales Rating: (28)

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Powder Springs, GA
    Posts
    4,890

    Default

    Go back and re-rip your CDs using FLAC or ALAC. Use your computer as a server if need be. MP3 are only good for small computer speakers, lousy OEM car systems, or cheap earbud headphones. Beyond that, and the sound quality is noticeably horrible!

  10. #10

    Member Sales Rating: (26)

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    The tube lair in Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    10,647

    Default

    Convenience = compromise in sound. That said, refer to post #4.
    In search of accurate reproduction of music. Real sound is my reference and while perfection may not be attainable? If I chase it, I might just catch excellence.

    "The best way to enjoy digital music reproduction is to never listen to good analogue reproduction". - Kenneth Swauger

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts