What can I expect from changing my tweeters out with RDO-194's on my monitor 5's ?
Buy Direct M-F 9am - 10:30pm EST 1-866-764-1801
Vist our Online StoreWhat can I expect from changing my tweeters out with RDO-194's on my monitor 5's ?
Have you done a search here. There are boat loads of info on the RD0194-1. Literally pages and pages of feedback.
"Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass
Pass Aleph 30; Adcom GFP750/Dared SL2000A; Adcom GDA600; MIT S3/Z Pc; SDA 1C; Squeezebox; Tubes add soul!
Assuming you have either SL1000's or SL2000's, replacing them with RD0-194 will result in a smoother and less fatiguing sound.
"He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And when you gaze long into an abyss the abyss also gazes into you." Friedrich Nietzsche
Which Monitor 5 do you have? If they have Peerless tweeters, the RDO-194 would be a downgrade. Not to mention they don't fit without modification.
Stan
Main 2ch:
Polk RTA11TL (RDO198-1, XO and Damping Upgrades)
Denon: DRA-835R, DVD-2910, DRM-800A; Monster HTS3600-MKII, Grado SR-225i
HT:
Denon AVR-888, Polk: RM7, PSW10
Other stuff:
Denon: DRA-825R, DCD-660, DRM-700A, DRR-780; Polk: S8, Monitor 5A & 5B, TSi100; Pioneer CT-6R, PL-530; Ortofon OM5E
I have two pairs of mon 5 and don't know if I would want to spend $98 on tweets for them because I paid 45 for one pair and 15 on the other, but its your money and they will sound better than the sl2000's
"Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass
Pass Aleph 30; Adcom GFP750/Dared SL2000A; Adcom GDA600; MIT S3/Z Pc; SDA 1C; Squeezebox; Tubes add soul!
Ive done the rdo in everything else, my 2.3, 2,3tl and rta 11t's and it was well worth it, but the monitor 5's are just surround and eventually a garage system.
"Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass
Pass Aleph 30; Adcom GFP750/Dared SL2000A; Adcom GDA600; MIT S3/Z Pc; SDA 1C; Squeezebox; Tubes add soul!
5.1 System:
Sharp Aquos 37" LCD
Front: SDA-CRS+
Center: CS400i
Surround: Monitor 7A
PSW10 subwoofer
Onkyo PR-SC886P Pre/Pro
NAD T955 5 channel power amplifier
Technics SL-1710 MK2 turntable
Audio-Technica AT14Sa cartridge
NAD 106 pre-amp
Panasonic DMP-BD85 Blu-Ray
MacBook Pro 2.16 GHz
2.0 Office System:
Monitor 10A (Peerless)
Outlaw 1050 receiver
Parasound HCA-1000A power amp
MacPro
Yes and no. It is the replacement, but the crossover may not be exact.
Take a look at what you have in there now and compare it to this: http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/atta...3&d=1155784674
"He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And when you gaze long into an abyss the abyss also gazes into you." Friedrich Nietzsche
When I swapped out the 2000's on my old CRS+ speakers, the high end was much smoother AND the midrange had more clarity. I guess without all the high frequency peaks, it allowed the midrange to become more intelligible. Christ, is that even a word?
stubby
Totally agree...I just played two identical pairs of srs's and the one set I just picked had the RDO-194's....Big difference!!! Sounds awesome and more together, the old SL2000 are great but they tend to ring at higher volumes. The RDO's are a worth the upgrade if your like me and don't want to mess with the original speaker to much.
Not that anyone else need to chime in as the point has been made, but I have experience moving from SL2000's to RDO's in both SDA-2B's and SDA SRS 2's.
It was truly impossible to listen to the SL2000's at moderate to high volumes for much more than 2 hours. With RDO's, I listen now about 8 hours per day.
VTL ST50 w/mods/RCA6L6GC/TlfnknECC801S
CJPV-5 w/mods
TT CJ Sonographe SG3 Oak/Sumiko LMT/Grado Wood Plat/Sumiko PIB2/The Clamp
Musical Fidelity A1 CDPro
Tuners w/mods Kenwood KT5020/Fisher KM60
MF x-DAC V8, HAInfo NG27
Herbies Ti-9/Vibrapods/MIT Shtgn AC1 IEC's/MIT Shotgun 2 IC's/MIT Shtgn 2 Speaker
PSAudio Cryo PwrPrt Prem/ExctPwrEP15A
Wlnt SDA 2B TL/Oak SDA SRS II TL-Sonicaps/Mills/Cardas/Cust SDA ICs/Mortite/Dynamat Extreme/TFLF Rings/FSB-2 Spikes
NAD SS rigs w/mods
GIK panels
How on earth can you listen to music at home 8 hrs a day? I want YOUR job.
8 hrs of work + 8 hrs of music + 8 hrs of sleep = 24 hrs in a day.... sounds simple enough to me :D
Most of them only hear how loud it sounds, and the rest of us hear everything else -
VTL ST50 w/mods/RCA6L6GC/TlfnknECC801S
CJPV-5 w/mods
TT CJ Sonographe SG3 Oak/Sumiko LMT/Grado Wood Plat/Sumiko PIB2/The Clamp
Musical Fidelity A1 CDPro
Tuners w/mods Kenwood KT5020/Fisher KM60
MF x-DAC V8, HAInfo NG27
Herbies Ti-9/Vibrapods/MIT Shtgn AC1 IEC's/MIT Shotgun 2 IC's/MIT Shtgn 2 Speaker
PSAudio Cryo PwrPrt Prem/ExctPwrEP15A
Wlnt SDA 2B TL/Oak SDA SRS II TL-Sonicaps/Mills/Cardas/Cust SDA ICs/Mortite/Dynamat Extreme/TFLF Rings/FSB-2 Spikes
NAD SS rigs w/mods
GIK panels
My feeling/impressions of the RDO-194---somewhat laid back,, a tweeter with a much smoother,,almost "silk lined" pleasant to the ears sound,,a SL 2000 on xanax,,lol,,YMMV.![]()
JC approves....he told me so. (F-1 nut)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)