Free Shipping on All Orders 1-866-764-1801

Vist our Online Store
+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 31 to 60 of 86
  1. #31

    Member Sales Rating: (4)

    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,584

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by heiney9 View Post
    Yeah, but you do realize the leads on a cap or resistor once it's soldered into the PCB is about a few cm long? The internal wiring is much, much longer so while I'm not sure swapping internal wiring will *always* make an audible difference it certainly can't hurt and your analogy really doesn't seem to apply. One certainly would gain more by shortening existing signal paths if at all possible and then using a proven high end solution like Cardas or Neotech or silver or gold, etc.

    Then it becomes cumulative, upgrading to better parts, shortening the signal path, using better more pure solder, keeping all connections clean, using better hook-up wire, etc, etc. All that together will make a difference.

    I assume we are talking speakers? But it applies to components as well, probably even moreso.

    H9
    You have a drain pipe that has water flowing through it constantly. From the source, the first section of pipe is 100 feet long and 8" in diameter. Then, it comes to a reducer that takes the 8" pipe down to a 1" pipe. The 1" pipe run is for only 5 feet. Finally, the 1" pipe changes back to an 8" pipe. How well is the water going to flow? The same can be said for speaker wire hitting the crossover (the 1" pipe) and then back to an 8" section to go back to the speaker drivers. It doesn't make sense to go back to 8" when your flow is limited to the 1" pipe after the reducer.

  2. #32

    Member Sales Rating: (13)

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Bridgeton NJ
    Posts
    4,384

    Default

    Than if all that is true than over 40% OF YOU GUYS ARE SHOOTING YOURSELF IN THE FOOT. FOR SPENDING EXCESSIVE MONEY FOR SPEAKER WIRES. As I have said I was bored and decided to play around. After the new speaker wires from MIT and upgrading the wire from the post to the crossover on one of the speakers. I can say that the volume on the left speaker sounds louder. Not by much but is louder. I had to adjust the fade by 1 to the right.
    HT setup
    Dynex 40 inch tv
    Denon DBP-1610
    Monster HTS 1650
    Pioneer Elite VSX-81TXV
    Carver A400X
    MIT Exp 3 Speaker Wire
    Martin Logan Aerius
    Apple Tv 2nd Gen
    Logitech Harmony One Advanced Remote

    Living Room
    63 inch Samsung PN63C800YF
    Polk Surroundbar 3000
    Samsung BD-C7900

  3. #33

    Member Sales Rating: (15)

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Indianapolis, IN
    Posts
    7,407

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bigaudiofanatic View Post
    Than if all that is true than over 40% OF YOU GUYS ARE SHOOTING YOURSELF IN THE FOOT. FOR SPENDING EXCESSIVE MONEY FOR SPEAKER WIRES. As I have said I was bored and decided to play around. After the new speaker wires from MIT and upgrading the wire from the post to the crossover on one of the speakers. I can say that the volume on the left speaker sounds louder. Not by much but is louder. I had to adjust the fade by 1 to the right.
    You aren't quite getting it buddy. Speaker wires go from amp to speaker. That would be considered a "longer run" in most cases compared to the short distance from the crossover to the speaker.
    I don't read the newsssspaperssss because dey aaaallllllllll...... have ugly print.

  4. #34

    Member Sales Rating: (16)

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    In A Van Down By The River
    Posts
    21,190

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mazeroth View Post
    You have a drain pipe that has water flowing through it constantly. From the source, the first section of pipe is 100 feet long and 8" in diameter. Then, it comes to a reducer that takes the 8" pipe down to a 1" pipe. The 1" pipe run is for only 5 feet. Finally, the 1" pipe changes back to an 8" pipe. How well is the water going to flow? The same can be said for speaker wire hitting the crossover (the 1" pipe) and then back to an 8" section to go back to the speaker drivers. It doesn't make sense to go back to 8" when your flow is limited to the 1" pipe after the reducer.
    Last time I checked water flowing thru a pipe isn't the same as electrons flowing thru a conductor. I get the analogy but it really doesn't apply as electron interaction with the conductor has nothing in common with water in a pipe. The pipe is just a conduit for the water to flow, electrons interact with a conductor beyond just flowing from one end to the other.

    Your analogy makes more sense for large runs of wire when the flow from one end to the other can be affected by the large distance the electrons have to flow.

    If this were the case then using a solid core wire in the largest possible diameter would give us the best results...........but it doesn't.

    H9
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass

    Pass Aleph 30; Eastern Electric Mini Max; Adcom GDA600; MIT S3/Z Pc; SDA 1C; Squeezebox; Tubes add soul!

  5. #35

    Member Sales Rating: (13)

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Bridgeton NJ
    Posts
    4,384

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by concealer404 View Post
    You aren't quite getting it buddy. Speaker wires go from amp to speaker. That would be considered a "longer run" in most cases compared to the short distance from the crossover to the speaker.
    I do understand that. But if your saying that the smaller wire on the crossover will not have that much effect because of its length than it should make some difference how the power gets to the crossover at least.
    HT setup
    Dynex 40 inch tv
    Denon DBP-1610
    Monster HTS 1650
    Pioneer Elite VSX-81TXV
    Carver A400X
    MIT Exp 3 Speaker Wire
    Martin Logan Aerius
    Apple Tv 2nd Gen
    Logitech Harmony One Advanced Remote

    Living Room
    63 inch Samsung PN63C800YF
    Polk Surroundbar 3000
    Samsung BD-C7900

  6. #36

    Member Sales Rating: (13)

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Bridgeton NJ
    Posts
    4,384

    Default

    I am not aruging for the sake of arguing just trying to gain more info.
    HT setup
    Dynex 40 inch tv
    Denon DBP-1610
    Monster HTS 1650
    Pioneer Elite VSX-81TXV
    Carver A400X
    MIT Exp 3 Speaker Wire
    Martin Logan Aerius
    Apple Tv 2nd Gen
    Logitech Harmony One Advanced Remote

    Living Room
    63 inch Samsung PN63C800YF
    Polk Surroundbar 3000
    Samsung BD-C7900

  7. #37

    Member Sales Rating: (15)

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Indianapolis, IN
    Posts
    7,407

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bigaudiofanatic View Post
    I do understand that. But if your saying that the smaller wire on the crossover will not have that much effect because of its length than it should make some difference how the power gets to the crossover at least.
    No, i'm saying that upgrading wire PAST the crossover won't have much affect at all, 1) because it's a very short distance, and 2) it's already been through the crossover.

    That said, it certainly can't hurt, so knock yourself out. :) If i was in there doing the same thing, i'd probably do it. Just 'cuz.

    But in terms of how the signal gets to the crossover, i believe you're exactly right, there.
    I don't read the newsssspaperssss because dey aaaallllllllll...... have ugly print.

  8. #38

    Member Sales Rating: (15)

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Indianapolis, IN
    Posts
    7,407

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bigaudiofanatic View Post
    I am not aruging for the sake of arguing just trying to gain more info.
    We know. ;) Or at least i do.
    I don't read the newsssspaperssss because dey aaaallllllllll...... have ugly print.

  9. #39

    Member Sales Rating: (16)

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    In A Van Down By The River
    Posts
    21,190

    Default

    I'm not really trying to be argumentative either. But there is a HUGE difference when electrons have to flow a few centimeters vs. a few feet. This is not taking into account the interaction (beyond simple flow of electrons) with the actual conduit. This is why shielded wire, silver wire, Cardas, Neotech, etc all can affect the sound..........not simply because of flow from one end to the other.

    I used to have M* 10g speaker wire way back when larger was better. I switched to 14g twisted pair and those cables sounded a lot better so it's not just about having the largest diameter.

    Anyway........I believe in upgrading internal wiring but it don't think just increasing the gauge of the wire is nec. going to make an audible improvement. It certainly can't hurt to have fresh non-corroded wire in place.
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass

    Pass Aleph 30; Eastern Electric Mini Max; Adcom GDA600; MIT S3/Z Pc; SDA 1C; Squeezebox; Tubes add soul!

  10. #40

    Member Sales Rating: (31)

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Long Island
    Posts
    14,735

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by F1nut View Post
    You'll get a far better return by upgrading the caps and resistors than changing the wire.
    I agree.

    As for as inboard wire making a difference, it can, depending on the application. If it's only a couple of inches long, it's unlikely that you'd hear a differences unless either wire is not of a sufficient gauge. But if it's a few feet long, any differences can be noticeable.
    "He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And when you gaze long into an abyss the abyss also gazes into you." Friedrich Nietzsche

  11. #41

    Member Sales Rating: (16)

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    In A Van Down By The River
    Posts
    21,190

    Default

    The thing I found with the internal wiring on my 5B's is it was 20 years old and had heavy oxidation under the insolation as well as the quick connect ends. So I just replaced the wire with a larger gauge OFC copper zip cord, since I was already in there upgrading X-over parts. I also removed the tweeter fuse from the circuit and used heavy gauge OFC copper wire for the jumpers where the fuse used to be. De-Oxit Pro Gold was used on all quick connectors and driver connections to help slow future oxidation.

    Simple enough and the biggest thing I got rid of was the oxidation.

    H9
    Last edited by heiney9; 12-22-2009 at 11:45 AM.
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass

    Pass Aleph 30; Eastern Electric Mini Max; Adcom GDA600; MIT S3/Z Pc; SDA 1C; Squeezebox; Tubes add soul!

  12. #42

    Member Sales Rating: (4)

    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,584

    Default

    You can replace all the wires, caps, resistors and inductors you want, as they will barely make an audible difference. If you don't have room treatments and only put in treatments at the first reflection point it will make a 100x bigger impact than anything you try to mod your speakers with.

    2005 Dayton Ohio DiY speaker meet. Many very good speaker designers there and upwards of 50 guys that build speakers as a hobby. A/B blind test in two different rooms. The first room had electrolytic caps versus poly caps. The second room had $500 (for 3 meters, if I recall) speaker cable versus 18 gauge lamp cord from Home Depot. The results? The cap room was a dead draw as to which sounded better and the lamp cord beat out the $500 wire by a few votes. I can't make this stuff up. I was there to witness it. Each listener sat down with a control box and could A/B on their own. Then they would say which sounded better, their vote was taken, and they were shown which they picked. Then the next guy entered the room.

    Speaker placement, room treatments, EQ and the likes are SO much more effective at making speakers sound better and more neutral. That's where you need to start if you want better sound. The little tweaks...complete waste of time.

    If you want to really get great sound, sound that will make you nearly **** yourself, look into digital room correction. Audiolense is an example:

    http://www.juicehifi.com/index.html

  13. #43

    Member Sales Rating: (31)

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Long Island
    Posts
    14,735

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mazeroth View Post
    You can replace all the wires, caps, resistors and inductors you want, as they will barely make an audible difference.


    2005 Dayton Ohio DiY speaker meet. Many very good speaker designers there and upwards of 50 guys that build speakers as a hobby. A/B blind test in two different rooms. The first room had electrolytic caps versus poly caps.
    What else do you expect from listening in an auditorium sized room?

    Next year's event will have a similar test with better components.
    "He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And when you gaze long into an abyss the abyss also gazes into you." Friedrich Nietzsche

  14. #44

    Member Sales Rating: (4)

    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,584

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Face View Post


    What else do you expect from listening in an auditorium sized room?

    Next year's event will have a similar test with better components.
    Hotel room with room treatments. High quality 2-ways were used with Scan Speak Revelators in the one room and Peerless drivers in the other.

    Do not pass go. Do not collect $200. :D

  15. #45

    Member Sales Rating: (31)

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Long Island
    Posts
    14,735

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mazeroth View Post
    Hotel room with room treatments. High quality 2-ways were used with Scan Speak Revelators in the one room and Peerless drivers in the other.

    Do not pass go. Do not collect $200. :D
    I may be thinking of images from another event.

    As for better components, I was referring to capacitors. IIRC, last time NPE's and either Sonic Caps or Daytons were used. I don't know how much I can disclose, but this time around will be 4 or more different caps, from Dayton, Claritycap, Solen, and others.
    "He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And when you gaze long into an abyss the abyss also gazes into you." Friedrich Nietzsche

  16. #46

    Member Sales Rating: (3)

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    SDA SweetSpot
    Posts
    5,199

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bigaudiofanatic View Post
    Your forgetting sense you are actually referring to electricity or current.
    No, I am not. I assure you that I am quite familiar with how electricity and current works...even down to the molecular and atomic levels.;)

    Quote Originally Posted by bigaudiofanatic View Post
    Their would be more than more runner. So you would want a wider track for as long as possible.
    No, you wouldn't. At least not inside the speaker.

    In my previous analogy, the defects in the indoor track were analogous to the impediments to current that are caused by the resistors, inductors and capacitors of every crossover. No matter how high the quality of the crossover components, the audio signal will loose some amount of information by traveling through them. However, the better the quality of the crossover components, the less information is lost.

    In the crossover, the electrical resistance caused by the resistors and the reactance of the capacitors and inductors reduces the amplitude, and therefore the power and information carrying content, of the audio signal. Wire has resistive and capacitive properties. Increasing crossover component lead length and size and the size of internal wiring over a certain point can introduce additional resistance and capacitance that can adversely affect the audio signal.

    Another thing to consider is that larger wire requires a greater amount of insulation. Wire insulation has capacitive properties that causes energy to be absorbed from and released back into the audio signal. The represents additional noise in the audio signal. Bear in mind that the audio signal will unavoidably be subjected to a reduction in signal to noise ratio just by the electrical properties of the crossover components. There is also additional loading on the audio signal by the coils in the speaker drivers and tweeters.

    Replacing internal speaker wiring with higher quality wire that has a higher quality less capacitive insulation may bring some audible benefit, but I would not recommend using larger wire.

    You cannot compare speaker cables to internal speaker wire. They serve two purposes. Residential streets and multi-lane freeways both transport traffic, but they are designed to handle that traffic differently according to the environments they serve.

    A well designed speaker cable serves to preserve as much of the high level signal coming from the power amplifier as possible while protecting that signal from the harsh effects of environmental noise (EFI/RFI). Short runs of speaker cable are ideal, but usually impractical. Larger, lower resistance conductors and insulation with better dielectric properties can counteract the disadvantages of long cable runs...up to a point.

    A speaker cable serves as both transport and "bodyguard" for the audio signal. Inside a well designed speaker cabinet, the bodyguard function is not required. In that environment, you want the wire to "get out of the way" and let the passive signal processor, the crossover, do its thing. The crossover chops down, compartmentalizes, and reroutes the audio signal. The crossover's passive processing does harm to the audio signal which is much greater in degree than that caused by the speaker cable. You certainly don't want to add anything to the crossover that will make its job more difficult.

    Hope this helps.
    "Polk SDA-SRSs are hopelessly out of date both sonically and technologically... I see no value whatsoever in older SDA speakers."~Audio Asylum Member
    __________________
    "Knowledge, without understanding, is a path to failure."~DK

  17. #47

    Member Sales Rating: (3)

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    373

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DarqueKnight View Post
    No, I am not. I assure you that I am quite familiar with how electricity and current works...even down to the molecular and atomic levels.;)



    No, you wouldn't. At least not inside the speaker.

    In my previous analogy, the defects in the indoor track were analogous to the impediments to current that are caused by the resistors, inductors and capacitors of every crossover. No matter how high the quality of the crossover components, the audio signal will loose some amount of information by traveling through them. However, the better the quality of the crossover components, the less information is lost.

    In the crossover, the electrical resistance caused by the resistors and the reactance of the capacitors and inductors reduces the amplitude, and therefore the power and information carrying content, of the audio signal. Wire has resistive and capacitive properties. Increasing crossover component lead length and size and the size of internal wiring over a certain point can introduce additional resistance and capacitance that can adversely affect the audio signal.

    Another thing to consider is that larger wire requires a greater amount of insulation. Wire insulation has capacitive properties that causes energy to be absorbed from and released back into the audio signal. The represents additional noise in the audio signal. Bear in mind that the audio signal will unavoidably be subjected to a reduction in signal to noise ratio just by the electrical properties of the crossover components. There is also additional loading on the audio signal by the coils in the speaker drivers and tweeters.

    Replacing internal speaker wiring with higher quality wire that has a higher quality less capacitive insulation may bring some audible benefit, but I would not recommend using larger wire.

    You cannot compare speaker cables to internal speaker wire. They serve two purposes. Residential streets and multi-lane freeways both transport traffic, but they are designed to handle that traffic differently according to the environments they serve.

    A well designed speaker cable serves to preserve as much of the high level signal coming from the power amplifier as possible while protecting that signal from the harsh effects of environmental noise (EFI/RFI). Short runs of speaker cable are ideal, but usually impractical. Larger, lower resistance conductors and insulation with better dielectric properties can counteract the disadvantages of long cable runs...up to a point.

    A speaker cable serves as both transport and "bodyguard" for the audio signal. Inside a well designed speaker cabinet, the bodyguard function is not required. In that environment, you want the wire to "get out of the way" and let the passive signal processor, the crossover, do its thing. The crossover chops down, compartmentalizes, and reroutes the audio signal. The crossover's passive processing does harm to the audio signal which is much greater in degree than that caused by the speaker cable. You certainly don't want to add anything to the crossover that will make its job more difficult.

    Hope this helps.
    I have been hanging around here for a couple of years now and today, this moment, there has been an epiphany for me..... Darque I think I understand you. I am now going to hang up and make an appointment with a therapist... Merry Christmas to all and to all a DarqueKnight!
    Home Theater
    Amp: sunfire cinema grand signature 5ch 425 wpc
    Side surround amp: Sunfire 2 X 300
    Processor: sunfire theater grand V
    Fronts:: polk sda-srs 1.2
    Rears: Polk LSiFX
    Side surrounds: Fxi5
    Center: (2)polk LSiC's
    Sub: svs pb-13 rosenut
    Hd-Dvd: toshiba xa-2
    Blue Ray: oppo bdp83se
    Projector: sony vw60
    Screen: Da-Lite 106"
    APC S20 Power conditioner

  18. #48

    Member Sales Rating: (3)

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    SDA SweetSpot
    Posts
    5,199

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mazeroth View Post
    You can replace all the wires, caps, resistors and inductors you want, as they will barely make an audible difference.
    In my nearly 25 years of modding speaker crossovers and listening to modded speakers in my home and in the homes of others, my experiences have been the opposite of this.

    Of course, perceived audio differences depend on the priorities and preferences of the listener. For some DIY speaker builders, the only determinants of "good sound" are loudness and then clarity. For the audiophile, additional sonic attributes such as image weight, pinpoint and stable images within a sound stage, sound stage dimensions, holography, 3-dimensionality and fine detail come into play. If the improvements that premium crossover components bring to the table are not things that a listener is sensitive to, then premium crossover components are of no apparent value.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mazeroth View Post
    If you don't have room treatments and only put in treatments at the first reflection point it will make a 100x bigger impact than anything you try to mod your speakers with.
    Not necessarily. Room treatments are important enhancements to good sound, but listening to compromised speakers in an acoustically perfect room is not a pleasant experience. I'll take a good clean optimized audio signal in a bad room over an average audio signal in an acoustically perfect room any day. For example, my office at work is an acoustically compromised 11' x 11' room with an 8' ceiling. I bought a pair of SDA CRS+ speakers to use with my office rig. I didn't think that modding the crossover would be of much value since the room acoustics are poor and my listening position is with my back to the speakers. My curiosity eventually got the better of me and I switched out the stock CRS+'s with a modded pair of CRS+'s from my home office. The sonic improvement, in that little square office space, was dramatic. The office rig's CRS+'s were immediately modded. I also went further by replacing the 90 wpc integrated amp with a 200 wpc power amp and separate preamp. The stock power cords of the amp, preamp and source components were also replaced. All of these changes brought audible improvements in audio performance aspects that are important to me. If I were just interested in "loud and clear" sound, I imagine the Sony boom box in my garage would suffice. However, if I were an automotive hobbyist and spent significant time in my garage, you can be assured that the Sony boom box would be replaced by something much, much better in sound quality.;)


    Quote Originally Posted by Mazeroth View Post
    The results? The cap room was a dead draw as to which sounded better and the lamp cord beat out the $500 wire by a few votes. I can't make this stuff up. I was there to witness it. Each listener sat down with a control box and could A/B on their own. Then they would say which sounded better, their vote was taken, and they were shown which they picked. Then the next guy entered the room.
    This is meaningless without knowing the listening preferences of the listeners. This is like telling me that some guys evaluated the physical attractiveness of two women and both women looked the same...then when I see pictures of the women, one had an absolutely gorgeous face, a perfect "hourglass" figure and size 40 DD breasts, the other woman had a butt ugly face, a boyish stick-like figure and size...40...DD...breasts. Yet, all the guys said the two women looked exactly the same.
    Last edited by DarqueKnight; 12-22-2009 at 01:25 PM.
    "Polk SDA-SRSs are hopelessly out of date both sonically and technologically... I see no value whatsoever in older SDA speakers."~Audio Asylum Member
    __________________
    "Knowledge, without understanding, is a path to failure."~DK

  19. #49

    Member Sales Rating: (3)

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    SDA SweetSpot
    Posts
    5,199

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BAD ASP View Post
    I am now going to hang up and make an appointment with a therapist...
    Why is a therapist needed?

    I inferred that you meant this jokingly, but I don't see the connection.
    "Polk SDA-SRSs are hopelessly out of date both sonically and technologically... I see no value whatsoever in older SDA speakers."~Audio Asylum Member
    __________________
    "Knowledge, without understanding, is a path to failure."~DK

  20. #50

    Member Sales Rating: (3)

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    373

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DarqueKnight View Post
    Why is a therapist needed?

    I inferred that you meant this jokingly, but I don't see the connection.
    Darque, I absolutely meant this jokingly. The therapist is because I understood thoroughly your analogy as it applied to this wacky hobby we're in and I merely meant that if anyone has gone this far then they must need therapy....LOL joke :D:D:D
    Home Theater
    Amp: sunfire cinema grand signature 5ch 425 wpc
    Side surround amp: Sunfire 2 X 300
    Processor: sunfire theater grand V
    Fronts:: polk sda-srs 1.2
    Rears: Polk LSiFX
    Side surrounds: Fxi5
    Center: (2)polk LSiC's
    Sub: svs pb-13 rosenut
    Hd-Dvd: toshiba xa-2
    Blue Ray: oppo bdp83se
    Projector: sony vw60
    Screen: Da-Lite 106"
    APC S20 Power conditioner

  21. #51

    Member Sales Rating: (3)

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    SDA SweetSpot
    Posts
    5,199

    Default

    Ahhhh ok.

    I have occasionally been told that my apparent obsession with audio and video is "kinda sick". However, this came from someone with 14 million pairs of shoes.;)

    I wonder if I would still be "kinda sick" if I were equally dedicated to buying diamond jewelry.;)
    "Polk SDA-SRSs are hopelessly out of date both sonically and technologically... I see no value whatsoever in older SDA speakers."~Audio Asylum Member
    __________________
    "Knowledge, without understanding, is a path to failure."~DK

  22. #52

    Member Sales Rating: (13)

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Bridgeton NJ
    Posts
    4,384

    Default

    LOL well as I have said I was and still am bored. When you have been unemployed for over a year you tend to start looking for stuff to do after looking for most of the week for work. When you go from a maintenance mechanic making 14.75 an hour to nothing but unemployment. You tend to look for a good job.
    HT setup
    Dynex 40 inch tv
    Denon DBP-1610
    Monster HTS 1650
    Pioneer Elite VSX-81TXV
    Carver A400X
    MIT Exp 3 Speaker Wire
    Martin Logan Aerius
    Apple Tv 2nd Gen
    Logitech Harmony One Advanced Remote

    Living Room
    63 inch Samsung PN63C800YF
    Polk Surroundbar 3000
    Samsung BD-C7900

  23. #53

    Member Sales Rating: (13)

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Bridgeton NJ
    Posts
    4,384

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DarqueKnight View Post
    Ahhhh ok.

    I have occasionally been told that my apparent obsession with audio and video is "kinda sick". However, this came from someone with 14 million pairs of shoes.;)

    I wonder if I would still be "kinda sick" if I were equally dedicated to buying diamond jewelry.;)
    LOL alright Elton John :D
    HT setup
    Dynex 40 inch tv
    Denon DBP-1610
    Monster HTS 1650
    Pioneer Elite VSX-81TXV
    Carver A400X
    MIT Exp 3 Speaker Wire
    Martin Logan Aerius
    Apple Tv 2nd Gen
    Logitech Harmony One Advanced Remote

    Living Room
    63 inch Samsung PN63C800YF
    Polk Surroundbar 3000
    Samsung BD-C7900

  24. #54

    Member Sales Rating: (3)

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    SDA SweetSpot
    Posts
    5,199

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bigaudiofanatic View Post
    LOL well as I have said I was and still am bored.
    It is good that you are keeping your mind occupied. I wish you success in soon finding good employment that matches your interests and skills.
    "Polk SDA-SRSs are hopelessly out of date both sonically and technologically... I see no value whatsoever in older SDA speakers."~Audio Asylum Member
    __________________
    "Knowledge, without understanding, is a path to failure."~DK

  25. #55

    Member Sales Rating: (3)

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    SDA SweetSpot
    Posts
    5,199

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bigaudiofanatic View Post
    LOL alright Elton John :D
    The jewelry would be for her, not for me.;)
    "Polk SDA-SRSs are hopelessly out of date both sonically and technologically... I see no value whatsoever in older SDA speakers."~Audio Asylum Member
    __________________
    "Knowledge, without understanding, is a path to failure."~DK

  26. #56

    Member Sales Rating: (58)

    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    6 Underground
    Posts
    25,306

    Default

    I'd upgrade the wire in my loudspeaker only if I was making a noose with the leftovers.

  27. #57

    Member Sales Rating: (0)

    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    2,102

    Default

    I am reluctant to join in this thread but...

    When I started contemplating the upgrades to my RTA11TL's I consulted with my former Polk Audio engineer friend. He mentioned the electrolytic caps, the resistors, damping the PR basket... the usual stuff. He did caution me about changing the inductors and the internal wiring as it would likely change the ESR. The XO component values were chosen with that specific gauge wire and wire length. Changing the ESR would alter the XO characteristics. In many cases, the gauge and length of the internal wires are specifically called out in the schematics.

    I suppose that there is nothing wrong with altering the XO characteristics as long as the results are pleasing to the listener. I think DarqueKnight is on the money when he says "Of course, perceived audio differences depend on the priorities and preferences of the listener."
    Stan
    Stan

    Main 2ch:
    Polk LSi15 (DB840 upgrade)
    Parasound: C/PT-600, HCA-800II; Denon: DVD-2910, DRM-800A; Monster HTS3600-MKII, Grado SR-225i

    HT:
    Denon AVR-888, Polk: RM7, PSW10, Marantz UD5005, Panasonic TC-P42S60

    Other stuff:
    Denon: DRA-835R, DRA-825R, DCD-660, DRM-700A, DRR-780; Polk: RTA11TL (RDO198-1, XO and Damping Upgrades), S8, Monitor 5A, TSi100; Pioneer CT-6R, PL-530; Onkyo CP-1046F; Ortofon OM5E, Marantz PM5004, CD5004

  28. #58

    Member Sales Rating: (3)

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    373

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DarqueKnight View Post
    Ahhhh ok.

    I have occasionally been told that my apparent obsession with audio and video is "kinda sick". However, this came from someone with 14 million pairs of shoes.;)

    I wonder if I would still be "kinda sick" if I were equally dedicated to buying diamond jewelry.;)
    or hot cars...........
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	bad_asp20070707_13.JPG‎
Views:	46
Size:	5.8 KB
ID:	45254   Click image for larger version

Name:	12265DSC00083[1] (Small) (2).jpg‎
Views:	47
Size:	50.1 KB
ID:	45256  
    Home Theater
    Amp: sunfire cinema grand signature 5ch 425 wpc
    Side surround amp: Sunfire 2 X 300
    Processor: sunfire theater grand V
    Fronts:: polk sda-srs 1.2
    Rears: Polk LSiFX
    Side surrounds: Fxi5
    Center: (2)polk LSiC's
    Sub: svs pb-13 rosenut
    Hd-Dvd: toshiba xa-2
    Blue Ray: oppo bdp83se
    Projector: sony vw60
    Screen: Da-Lite 106"
    APC S20 Power conditioner

  29. #59

    Member Sales Rating: (3)

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    373

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by skrol View Post
    I am reluctant to join in this thread but...

    When I started contemplating the upgrades to my RTA11TL's I consulted with my former Polk Audio engineer friend. He mentioned the electrolytic caps, the resistors, damping the PR basket... the usual stuff. He did caution me about changing the inductors and the internal wiring as it would likely change the ESR. The XO component values were chosen with that specific gauge wire and wire length. Changing the ESR would alter the XO characteristics. In many cases, the gauge and length of the internal wires are specifically called out in the schematics.

    I suppose that there is nothing wrong with altering the XO characteristics as long as the results are pleasing to the listener. I think DarqueKnight is on the money when he says "Of course, perceived audio differences depend on the priorities and preferences of the listener."
    Stan
    I agree Stan, I bought a pair of stock 1.2's and was completely satisfied with the sound. I read here about upgrading the tweets and having the crossovers upgraded. I hesitated for awhile and got to know the stock 1.2's pretty good. I then proceeded to install the upgraded tweets and the sound was different, not necessarily better but still a very nice sounding speaker to my ears. I then went to the next step and had Ben upgrade the crossovers. When I first turned them on they sounded overly bright and not warm at all. I was told that there was a burn in required. I did let them burn in and what an amazing change. To my ears the sound was improved dramatically. A friend who wasn't aware that I had upgraded the speakers came over for a bit of movie watching (Iron Man) and then some music afterwards commented on the sound. He was amazed that the music was 2 channel and wasn't coming from the center channel as well. He has some Martin Logans and I believe he has speaker envy but I don't think he'll admit it openly.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	XO original (Medium).jpg‎
Views:	69
Size:	69.1 KB
ID:	45263   Click image for larger version

Name:	XO new (Medium).jpg‎
Views:	72
Size:	82.0 KB
ID:	45264  
    Home Theater
    Amp: sunfire cinema grand signature 5ch 425 wpc
    Side surround amp: Sunfire 2 X 300
    Processor: sunfire theater grand V
    Fronts:: polk sda-srs 1.2
    Rears: Polk LSiFX
    Side surrounds: Fxi5
    Center: (2)polk LSiC's
    Sub: svs pb-13 rosenut
    Hd-Dvd: toshiba xa-2
    Blue Ray: oppo bdp83se
    Projector: sony vw60
    Screen: Da-Lite 106"
    APC S20 Power conditioner

  30. #60

    Member Sales Rating: (13)

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Bridgeton NJ
    Posts
    4,384

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DarqueKnight View Post
    It is good that you are keeping your mind occupied. I wish you success in soon finding good employment that matches your interests and skills.
    Thank you I am currently attending college. I just finished my first semester with all a's and will be starting my next semester in about 8 weeks. My master is Computer Science and Networking. I think doing this will help me get a good job that will help menot only move out but allow me to enjoy my interests more.
    HT setup
    Dynex 40 inch tv
    Denon DBP-1610
    Monster HTS 1650
    Pioneer Elite VSX-81TXV
    Carver A400X
    MIT Exp 3 Speaker Wire
    Martin Logan Aerius
    Apple Tv 2nd Gen
    Logitech Harmony One Advanced Remote

    Living Room
    63 inch Samsung PN63C800YF
    Polk Surroundbar 3000
    Samsung BD-C7900

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. SOLD Signalcable Classic Internal bi-wire 15ft
    By polkatese in forum For Sale (FS) Classifieds
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 12-25-2008, 02:23 AM
  2. What's the best internal wire for speakers?
    By Ricardo in forum Vintage Speakers
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 11-17-2007, 04:06 PM
  3. Internal Speaker Wire
    By Drumingman in forum Basic Hookup/Wiring Questions
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 05-26-2006, 07:31 AM
  4. Internal Speaker Wires
    By ezc in forum Basic Hookup/Wiring Questions
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 04-17-2003, 12:02 PM
  5. Internal Speaker Wire?
    By flynbw01 in forum Basic Hookup/Wiring Questions
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 08-02-2002, 01:14 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts