|
|||||||
| Register | System Showcase | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member Sales Rating: (21)
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Georgia
Posts: 4,105
|
It is pretty well known that you do not want your speakers wired out of phase, and that a general rule of thumb is that if you have a subwoofer in the front and one in the rear, you will have to set the rear subwoofer 180deg out of phase with the front, generally speaking.
This is to eliminate cancellation of the sound waves. If the right front speaker is moving out, and the left speaker is moving in, there is canceling of sound, positive plus negative equals nothing. Similarly, you WANT the rear subwoofer out of phase with the front, when the front subwoofer driver is moving out, you want the rear subwoofer driver moving in, that way they work together and not against each other. Finally my question/thought/rambling: I am looking at building a subwoofer with a driver and a passive radiator, and want to but them both on the front face of the cabinet (ok I am looking at stealing the North Creek design for the Peerless 12” XLS driver and passive radiator) . The Passive radiator is a slave to the driver, it only gets it’s movement from the drivers movement, so when the driver moves out, the PR moves in. How does this not cause cancellation? Many here own early Polks that use a PR design, same question. And if you own SDA’s, man what a mess, they use a PR, I have the same question as above but add to it, the SDA drivers are out of phase with the stereo drivers, so you have stereo drivers in phase, PR out of phase with the stereo drivers, and a PR that is out of phase with the stereo drivers, but in phase with the SDA drivers, my head hurts!
__________________
Looking - Preamp Looking - Power amp Sony DVP-NS999ES - SACD player ADS 1230 - Polk SDA 2B DIY Stereo Subwoofer towers w/(4) 12 drivers each Crown K1 - Subwoofer amp Outlaw ICBM - crossover Beringher BFD - sub eq Where is the remote? Where is the $%#$% remote! "I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us have...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..." |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Moderator
Member Sales Rating: (37)
|
Russ,
I think it all boils down to resonant frequencies of the active drivers, and the passive radiator. PR's are tuned lower than the active drivers (sometimes substantially), so they aren't producing the same frequencies - so there is nothing to cancel out. Good question though, I'd like to know more of the tech side of it. Cheers, Russ
__________________
If you're gonna be dumb, you gotta be tough - when you get knocked down, you gotta get back up - Roger Alan Wade |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member Sales Rating: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kansas
Posts: 7,572
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member Sales Rating: (1)
|
Quote:
??? HBomb ???
__________________
***WAREMTAE*** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |||
|
Member Sales Rating: (21)
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Georgia
Posts: 4,105
|
Quote:
Quote:
The driver makes sound by moving in and out, same with the PR. Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member Sales Rating: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sooner Country
Posts: 3,467
|
They are "out of phase" using your analogy just as a port or vent would act. Air pressure from the woofer moving in pushes the PR (air)outwards.
This isn't a phase problem though since there is no electrical signal causing them to push against each other in a cancellation mode, only the weight of the PR giving back pressure for the woofer to load against helping to keep the driver from bottoming. The tuning of the PR will normally be lower than the woofers resonance frequency to give more bass extension just as a port tunes the box lower than the fs of the driver. No more sound comes out of a PR than comes out of a port unless it resonating a frequency. There is no electrical energy to release. When you physically push on a woofer with your hand, no note is heard. Same with the PR.
__________________
HT Optoma H31 on 80" DIY Screen Harman Kardon AVR7200 Pioneer Elite DV45A Polk CS350LS Polk SDA1C Polk FX300 Polk RT55 Dual EBS Adire Shiva 320watt tuned to 17hz ICs-DIY Twisted Prs Speaker-Raymond Cable 2 Channel Ariston RD40 w/ Grado Cart SACD/CD Marantz 8260 Soundstream/Krell DAC1 Audio Mirror PP1 Odyssey Stratos ADS L-1230 ICs-DIY Twisted Speaker-Raymond Cable Last edited by Dennis Gardner; 01-25-2005 at 01:19 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
Member Sales Rating: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,591
|
Quote:
Above the resonant frequency of the PR they are in acoustic phase and the PR is used to damp the motion of the active driver. The reason PRs are used is to tune the system lower without having to bend the port. For example, in the speakers I am building right now, the port required is about 15" long which requires a very deep cabinet. The PR's aren't exactly the same as a port, they have a steeper rolloff. They are also considered to have a higher group delay and worse transient response but whether these things are a problem at low frequencies is debateable. Quote:
There is a good section in The Loudspeaker Design Cookbook by Vance Dickason on passive radiators and there is some good info here: http://www.diysubwoofers.org/prd/
__________________
Graham Last edited by gatemplin; 01-25-2005 at 01:21 PM.. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member Sales Rating: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kansas
Posts: 7,572
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member Sales Rating: (21)
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Georgia
Posts: 4,105
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member Sales Rating: (11)
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 1,858
|
A port doesn't have a voice coil either but it makes plenty of noise. The PR works just like a port.
http://www.diysubwoofers.org/prd/
__________________
Sony KDL-40V2500 HDTV, Rotel RSX-1067 Receiver, Sony BDP-S550 Blu-ray, Slim Devices Squeezebox, Polk RTi6, CSi3 & R15, DIY sub with Atlas 15 |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member Sales Rating: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: York, PA / Mumbai, India
Posts: 4,453
|
Russman's pretty much 100% right on this one. The PR reacts to thos frequencies close to it's tuning and starts taking the load off of the active drivers by producing those sounds themselves by resonating. So while your mids are driving a 30, 100, 700 Hz signal, the PR is taking the load of the 30Hz signal. There is also some funky phase correlations that have to do with box size and sound wave length that I really need to learn a bit more about.
__________________
There is no genuine justice in any scheme of feeding and coddling the loafer whose only ponderable energies are devoted wholly to reproduction. Nine-tenths of the rights he bellows for are really privileges and he does nothing to deserve them. We not only acquired a vast population of morons, we have inculcated all morons, old or young, with the doctrine that the decent and industrious people of the country are bound to support them for all time.-Menkin |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Member Sales Rating: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kansas
Posts: 7,572
|
Quote:
Not trying to argue, I'm just having a really hard time grasping this concept. I would think that only a poorly designed PR/port/vent would make its own noise. Regards, PolkThug |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Member Sales Rating: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kansas
Posts: 7,572
|
Quote:
Linked from that page: "The PR's allow for lower tuning in a smaller enclosure where a typical port will not fit. PR's also do not have the issues with compression or noise that ports do, allowing for higher maximum output, and lower distortion." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Member Sales Rating: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,591
|
Yes ports and PRs do produce sound. They are Helmholtz resonators. Think of the air in the enclosure like a spring with a resonant frequency. Dont think of the system as hydraulically coupled pistons (like a slave and master).
At high frequencies the PR hardly moves and ignores the driver. When the driver produces frequencies near the PR resonant frequency it will dampen the motion of the active cone and will be producing most of the output. Here is a FR graph of a PR system. You can see where the PR and driver are in phase and the output sums greater, and down low where they are out of phase the total output is less than the sum of the driver and PR. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Member Sales Rating: (11)
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 1,858
|
Quote:
I imagine PR's work the same way. they're weighted (or tuned) at a frequency and when you reach that frequency the PR is doing most of the bass reproduction. gatemplin, beat me to it. He summed it up nicely. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Member Sales Rating: (15)
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Northern Colorado
Posts: 10,884
|
The PR is tuned to a given frequency dependent upon the weight you load it with and the box size. It has a peak output at this tuned frequency and drops off above and below. On frequencies above and below the resonance it will be very much out of phase (although at a much lower sound level) and as you approach the tuned frequency it will be more in phase which will give you a higher output at those frequencies.
The description of having front subs out of phase with rear subs is not correct. If you do that it is only to smooth out some irregularity in a given room and is not the norm. For most rooms the multiple subs should be of the same polarity no matter how they are oriented. Keep in mind that you are trying to pressurize a room, not move air back and forth between speakers. madmax
__________________
Vinyl, the final frontier... Avantgarde horns, 300b tubes, thats the kinda crap I want... |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Member Sales Rating: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,591
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Member Sales Rating: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kansas
Posts: 7,572
|
Quote:
Ok, I will play devil's advocate to myself and prove that a PR can make its own sound. Let's start out with a box with a driver and a PR in it, with your stereo off. You can push on the PR all day long with your hand, as fast as you want, and no audible sound will come out of it (unless you have a squeaky PR). Now, turn on the stereo on low volume, the driver immediately starts making sound and bouncing sound waves around in the box. You may now feel a slight vibration on the PR itself, although it is not visibly moving back and forth yet. With your ear up to it you can hear some sound passing through it, just like you can hear sound passing through a thin wall (my wife reminds me of this). Now turn up the volume. The driver moves back and forth and the PR is now visibly moving. The thing that has changed is now the sound waves on the inside of the box are hitting a moving PR and not a still one. This moving PR alters the sound that is passing through it, thus creating its own sound. Regards, Polkthug |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Member Sales Rating: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,591
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Member Sales Rating: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kansas
Posts: 7,572
|
The theory is "PR's make their own sound."
So far we have our thoughts, and as you point out, theoretical responses, but no real-world objective data. Either way, I'm having fun thinking about how this works. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Moderator
Member Sales Rating: (48)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: 6ft Under
Posts: 19,887
|
PolkThug - No offense, but you seem to immediately question the validity of comments regarding speakers and the effects of cables, due to recently purchasing test measurement devices and software.
Building a speaker enclosure requires theoretical AND hard data, but not everything needs plots and graphs to show an improvement to do with audio. An individuals opinion on the effects of something added or subtracted from their system, with or without measurement data, is still an opinion regardless of content. I think we all get this, don't we Am I to expect the "toilet flush" plot or the "angry wife" graph? Again, seriously, no offense. I'm just trying to understand what your intentions are. I will certainly agree that hard data is something good to have and to perform. Speaker design has been around for more than a couple months. There are some excellent resources in hardcopy format that would help you see these theories and the applications explained. Last edited by dorokusai; 01-25-2005 at 04:56 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Member Sales Rating: (15)
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Northern Colorado
Posts: 10,884
|
Quote:
Take hold of something, anything, and move it to and fro 100 times a second. You will hear a frequency of 100 hz. Can you do this with your hand? Not you doro... ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Moderator
Member Sales Rating: (48)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: 6ft Under
Posts: 19,887
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Member Sales Rating: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kansas
Posts: 7,572
|
Don't blame me, I don't trust anybody since the Bose people tricked me a few years ago.
![]() Nothin' to do with test equipment, I'm just trying to figure out how a "weighted panel on springs" creates its own sound wave. Which I think I *may* have figured out in my last paragraph a few posts up. Intention is learning (and I'll admit it, I'm bored at work). Regards, PT |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Moderator
Member Sales Rating: (48)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: 6ft Under
Posts: 19,887
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Member Sales Rating: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kansas
Posts: 7,572
|
Quote:
Thanks, PolkThug |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|